From unknown Sat Sep 20 12:59:29 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#15370 <15370@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#15370 <15370@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat Reply-To: bug#15370 <15370@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 19:59:29 +0000 retitle 15370 weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat reassign 15370 guile submitter 15370 Thien-Thi Nguyen severity 15370 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 13 11:56:21 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2013 15:56:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVjH-000463-ST for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:56:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48107) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVam-0003sI-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVaa-0000OG-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:27 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVaa-0000O6-N5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVaU-0008Df-Q8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVaO-0000Df-RO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:14 -0400 Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:58133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVaO-0000DI-Fs for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:47:08 -0400 Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.233.70.113) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 52311EC7002E31A3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:46:59 +0200 Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VKVdO-00057K-99 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:50:14 +0200 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:49:56 +0200 Message-ID: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:56:17 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Proc =E2=80=98uniform-vector-read!=E2=80=99 is deprecated (ugh), and its im= plementation rebased onto =E2=80=98(rnrs io ports) get-bytevector-n!=E2=80=99. Unfortun= ately, there seems to be a glitch in the arg shuffling. Here is /tmp/foo.scm: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/x-scheme Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=foo.scm Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 KHVzZS1tb2R1bGVzICgocm5ycyBpbyBwb3J0cykgIzpzZWxlY3QgKGdldC1ieXRldmVjdG9yLW4h KSkpCgooY2FsbC13aXRoLWlucHV0LXN0cmluZwogIioqKioiIChsYW1iZGEgKHBvcnQpCiAgICAg ICAgICAobGV0ICgodXZlIChtYWtlLXR5cGVkLWFycmF5ICdzMTYgMCAxKSkpCiAgICAgICAgICAg IChmb3JtYXQgI3QgInV2ZTogflMgKH5BKX4lIgogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHV2ZSAodW5p Zm9ybS12ZWN0b3ItZWxlbWVudC1zaXplIHV2ZSkpCiAgICAgICAgICAgIChjYXNlIChmYWxzZS1p Zi1leGNlcHRpb24KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChzdHJpbmctPnN5bWJvbCAoY2FkciAoY29t bWFuZC1saW5lKSkpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICgob2spIChnZXQtYnl0ZXZlY3Rvci1uISBwb3J0 IHV2ZSAwIDIpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICgoa28pICh1bmlmb3JtLXZlY3Rvci1yZWFkISB1dmUg cG9ydCkpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAoZm9ybWF0ICN0ICJ1dmU6IH5TfiUiIHV2ZSkpKSkK --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable and here is a series of invocations that demonstrate the discrepency between =E2=80=98get-bytevector-n!=E2=80=99 (ok) and =E2=80=98uniform-vecto= r-read!=E2=80=99 (ko): --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=badness set -x ; guile --version ; guile -s foo.scm ; guile -s foo.scm ok ; guile -s foo.scm ko + guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.9 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License LGPLv3+: GNU LGPL 3 or later . This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. + guile -s foo.scm uve: #s16(0) (2) uve: #s16(0) + guile -s foo.scm ok uve: #s16(0) (2) uve: #s16(10794) + guile -s foo.scm ko uve: #s16(0) (2) `uniform-vector-read!' is deprecated. Use `get-bytevector-n!' from `(rnrs io ports)' instead. Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 157: 11 [catch #t # ...] In unknown file: ?: 10 [apply-smob/1 #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 63: 9 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...] In ice-9/eval.scm: 432: 8 [eval # #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2320: 7 [save-module-excursion #] 3968: 6 [#] 1645: 5 [%start-stack load-stack ...] 1650: 4 [#] In unknown file: ?: 3 [primitive-load "/tmp/foo.scm"] ?: 2 [call-with-input-string "****" ...] In ice-9/eval.scm: 432: 1 [eval # #] In unknown file: ?: 0 [uniform-vector-read! #s16(0) # ...] ERROR: In procedure uniform-vector-read!: ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Value out of range: 4 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable FWIW, Guile 1.8.8 produces same output as =E2=80=98ok=E2=80=99 on a similar= (sans the =E2=80=98use-modules=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98uniform-vector-element-size=E2= =80=99 noise) input, so i think this situation is a regression. Am i missing something? =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIzNCcACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJoIwCfVxK7a6h7wNIgmy34QD7zaCRn Q+sAn0nIIC1JqzQSl8tTKWriMbLYd1lJ =G2HD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 04:59:41 2013 Received: (at 15370) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2013 08:59:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXorM-00025U-NI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:59:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:39863) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXorK-00025G-5y for 15370@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:59:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so5250394wgh.34 for <15370@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 01:59:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=or4lHTXLu+i9ffPHU0gUacdv2ButYwzGDq1PAOEQIW0=; b=uFgY3V1OraE4g6zW8s/3xxTM6Z2PYHFR86olGLQxKYY3sdvNjiJRMEwiueLRfeaAiD qmZNl7Z98O4v/S6q2aogiyPpvT+6YWA6YGAUZoUyL11y90427/Kvgu1M0cBEC6cbm2s2 muIgYAOyAxO/rxgVc5ZXNYpv+awQyd3uIrCewfJ1WtGhRMUc16W1kKUmhqxVz8KvtYe7 UXTlt8RoEBW7QweVoq1LafMAv3L3VDZp8WouoLNgVbNwZQ/pV99Bm42UljWXVWqfK9cL /5h2chO/pqkonrQyfzBc3sNhXtHazePWSY/20b3mK8WS4yRTqi6I1neFV3xUx46UjIYi k8Ug== X-Received: by 10.180.221.38 with SMTP id qb6mr5496379wic.8.1382259572274; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 01:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Kagami.home (host86-132-92-201.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.92.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iz19sm20396047wic.9.2013.10.20.01.59.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 01:59:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Price To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Subject: Re: bug#15370: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat References: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:59:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:49:56 +0200") Message-ID: <87r4bg1fo1.fsf@Kagami.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15370 Cc: 15370@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > ERROR: In procedure uniform-vector-read!: > ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Value out of range: 4 > > FWIW, Guile 1.8.8 produces same output as ‘ok’ on a similar (sans the > ‘use-modules’ and ‘uniform-vector-element-size’ noise) input, so i think > this situation is a regression. Am i missing something? You'll notice that if you supply the parameters directly e.g. (uniform-vector-read! uve port 0 1), it succeeds. That's enough to pin it down to the lines c_end = SCM_UNBNDP (end) ? SCM_BYTEVECTOR_LENGTH (uvec) : scm_to_size_t (end); c_end *= c_width; in scm_uniform_vector_read_x in libguile/deprecated.c Bytevector length returns the number of bytes, but end specifies the index. We should only be multiplying the latter, not the former. Simple fix is to fold the multiplication into the else branch of the conditional. Since this procedure is marked deprecated, I'd like to know how long it has left before I patch it. Little point fixing it if it's soon... Cheers -- Ian Price -- shift-reset.com "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 10:37:19 2013 Received: (at 15370) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2013 14:37:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59230 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXu87-0003HY-Dk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:37:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:39060) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXu83-0003HD-SE for 15370@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:37:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so2852984wid.5 for <15370@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:37:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=9VZtlOWvumCb3+pkIoKudC3o/DpCQ23evIpsI5J4lmE=; b=VY7z60Kh86QcEQDbmdlW4xvb8JonG5pRzDT7C6aaYA2a6LaLr54s1opYYrWSJ1jw7c aHnrNdIlOvoCWVnQLtIS/boUxHv3Y4s8OqQ5Qe93PdtiN4m8+7BuGL+P846+QcrZf8io 3LlRaREVuHju2ANbF67/xXZRaSYqtWMXz5vHN5MwS2I/TqCiiy3xWw5gMP7LaWc4UWX2 3IkscnZxQQQfmU1b8U2UznkLejgdvEVqgEb+cvsLPrPi9xWtXUp9TRzDUEIlOVWF0IT0 HNBKZKkcJepIM3bR7jK8HzyLBocMIqX1cOM/Ug+0iU56eqRpjihdlO0OpfkAzr0xRtbR Y/TQ== X-Received: by 10.180.99.99 with SMTP id ep3mr6288706wib.11.1382279829703; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Kagami.home (host86-132-92-201.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.92.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q3sm14800352wib.5.2013.10.20.07.37.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:37:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Price To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Subject: Re: bug#15370: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat References: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87r4bg1fo1.fsf@Kagami.home> <87iowsfd9k.fsf@zigzag.favinet> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:36:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87iowsfd9k.fsf@zigzag.favinet> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:27:35 +0200") Message-ID: <87k3h8101g.fsf@Kagami.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15370 Cc: 15370@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > I think it is good to fix it regardless of the remaining time. Leaving > it in a known-bad state sends a message tinged w/ coercion -- Not Cool. There has been talk of making the next version the first release of the next major version. If the next version was the major version it would likely mean removing deprecations. _That_ is the scenario I am concerned about, not lording it over you to update your programs. A fix that never gets released isn't a fix. -- Ian Price -- shift-reset.com "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 13:20:03 2013 Received: (at 15370) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2013 17:20:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXwfZ-0007HK-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:20:02 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:47289 ident=hope6) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXwfX-0007H5-Is for 15370@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:20:00 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VXwfQ-0004Rb-KE; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:19:52 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: Ian Price Subject: Re: bug#15370: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat References: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87r4bg1fo1.fsf@Kagami.home> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:18:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r4bg1fo1.fsf@Kagami.home> (Ian Price's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2013 09:59:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87mwm3g8sh.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15370 Cc: Thien-Thi Nguyen , 15370@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Hi Ian, Ian Price writes: > Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > >> ERROR: In procedure uniform-vector-read!: >> ERROR: In procedure get-bytevector-n!: Value out of range: 4 >> >> FWIW, Guile 1.8.8 produces same output as =E2=80=98ok=E2=80=99 on a simi= lar (sans the >> =E2=80=98use-modules=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98uniform-vector-element-size= =E2=80=99 noise) input, so i think >> this situation is a regression. Am i missing something? > > You'll notice that if you supply the parameters directly > e.g. (uniform-vector-read! uve port 0 1), it succeeds. That's enough to > pin it down to the lines > > c_end =3D SCM_UNBNDP (end) ? SCM_BYTEVECTOR_LENGTH (uvec) : scm_to_size= _t (end); > c_end *=3D c_width; > > in scm_uniform_vector_read_x in libguile/deprecated.c=20 > > Bytevector length returns the number of bytes, but end specifies the > index. We should only be multiplying the latter, not the former. Simple > fix is to fold the multiplication into the else branch of the > conditional. Indeed! > Since this procedure is marked deprecated, I'd like to know how long it > has left before I patch it. Little point fixing it if it's soon... It will certainly not be removed in the 2.0.x release series, which will remain in use for at least another year or so. Therefore, this should definitely be fixed. Would you like to do it? In any case, thanks for investigating! Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 15:31:13 2013 Received: (at 15370-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2013 19:31:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXyiW-0001zm-OF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:31:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:64134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXyiU-0001zZ-M7 for 15370-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:31:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id cb5so4333186wib.2 for <15370-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:31:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=p/uQdoZjbyDu5hnr6DZke6HJ9gVK1Wl9JAd+R+O0wi0=; b=PmcfVO49WGeJTUcKl8FYqBTPVEGN0ykze0oIBjtz/wvq/yTZGSceY5XO9r/pvro66y bLo14DHSCi7x4ViwboYDKhOv6G0RSj3kaUg37d0gEzox5uhUvVHLDo19fmSI8DUrS+vA 8xKRVQmMFeSqV9/09FJWlAajPxzBO/loH5Hx/o8UurnfdjVkt4T+IRFfuvZjW4j6CjQb qUcxdPUxa0M0jUCb7W7e7YPS4o6lFCRZhhlqSN/DmHdBAIT09l6PYofPpe690Ab4v5pO LEKxHnnRrCjNE5As29lHp7zhZ6f/qQz4E5QlyJx+oImTx5cpcA0gkfr0iKX+K0l+S2pV IMrQ== X-Received: by 10.194.9.70 with SMTP id x6mr10416866wja.22.1382297464927; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Kagami.home (host86-132-92-201.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.92.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b13sm48438104wic.9.2013.10.20.12.31.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Price To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#15370: weirdness w/ uniform-vector-read! compat References: <874n9obu1n.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87r4bg1fo1.fsf@Kagami.home> <87mwm3g8sh.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 20:30:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mwm3g8sh.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:18:54 -0400") Message-ID: <87fvrv20zx.fsf@Kagami.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15370-done Cc: Thien-Thi Nguyen , 15370-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) Mark H Weaver writes: > It will certainly not be removed in the 2.0.x release series, which will > remain in use for at least another year or so. Therefore, this should > definitely be fixed. Would you like to do it? As long as it wasn't _next_ release, I am happy to fix it. Patch pushed. Closing. Cheers ttn -- Ian Price -- shift-reset.com "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" From unknown Sat Sep 20 12:59:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator