From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 10 16:49:17 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2013 20:49:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53368 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUs8-0005yi-Rt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:49:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUs4-0005yQ-KE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:49:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUrq-0007Jt-Qc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:49:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUrq-0007Jp-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUrk-0001NT-Or for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUrd-0007HC-9b for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:52 -0400 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:49321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VJUrc-0007GO-LK for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:45 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.12] (Athenae [192.168.4.12]) by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id r8AKmbCD045468 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:48:40 -0700 Message-ID: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:48:37 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-coreutils@gnu.org Subject: Bug or dubious feature? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I was trying to move a directory with the 'mv' command. Instead of renaming the files it copied and deleted them. The source and destination were the same disk which a stat of the source and destination would confirm. The "oddity", is that I was moving between /usr/share/fonts -> /home/law/fonts where I use "rbind" to mount part of home in /usr/share: (fstab) /home/share /usr/share none rbind stat shows: > stat -c %D /usr/share /home/share fe03 fe03 So... why didn't it rename if the device numbers are the same? I'm sure it wouldn't try a rename if I moved from /usr->/usr/share as share is a different partition/device number, so it seems 'mv' does check device id's to verify sameness upon move. Then why not in moving what was "effectively", /home/share/fonts/ => /home/law/fonts/. ? It was only 12G of files, so it was done in ~ 5-10 minutes, but I was expecting a few seconds...?? Coreutils 8.21/linux 3.9.11 / xfs filesystem. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 10 17:01:31 2013 Received: (at 15328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2013 21:01:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJV3x-0006K3-ME for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:01:31 -0400 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:44753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJV3v-0006Js-60 for 15328@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:01:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.12] (Athenae [192.168.4.12]) by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id r8AL1L5q046808 for <15328@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:01:24 -0700 Message-ID: <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:01:21 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 15328@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#15328: Bug or dubious feature? References: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> In-Reply-To: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15328 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Whatever the problem is, it's not in 'mv'... I tried to run my dedup'r, and got this: /usr/share/fonts/sys> time ndedup /home/law/fonts/sys2/ . Paths: 34474, uniq nodes: 20192, total_size: 12.8GB (12.9GB allocated). ERROR: Invalid cross-device link doing link(./desktop.ini, /home/law/fonts/sys2//desktop.ini): \ (Invalid cross-device link) at /home/law/bin/ndedup line 1107 10.40sec 10.11usr 0.28sys (99.98% cpu) ---- But this works (same dir's): /usr/share/fonts/sys> cd /home/share/fonts/sys /home/share/fonts/sys> time ndedup /home/law/fonts/sys2/ . Paths: 34474, uniq nodes: 20191, total_size: 12.8GB (12.9GB allocated). Nodes(done/uniq); Space(read / alloc'd) 35011/12758 25.5GB / 7.2GB space ;cursz: 37.8MB; newlnks: 7433(1730 cmps_skip, 11046 cmps_full) 5.7GB in 7434 duplicate files found found. 49.75sec 35.34usr 12.90sys (96.98% cpu) Anyone know if this is a documented kernel "feature"? Seems odd. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 11 19:00:17 2013 Received: (at 15328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2013 23:00:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJtOP-0000FC-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:00:15 -0400 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:50998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJtOM-0000EI-Mj for 15328@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:00:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.12] (Athenae [192.168.4.12]) by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id r8BN04si003058 for <15328@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:00:07 -0700 Message-ID: <5230F5F4.1000302@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:00:04 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 15328@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#15328: Bug or dubious feature? (coreutils consistency prob) References: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> In-Reply-To: <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15328 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Linda Walsh wrote: > > Whatever the problem is, it's not in 'mv'... ---- But there is a consistency problem in core utils. Even though /usr/share/fonts and /home/share/fonts are the same directory with /home/share being mounted with "rbind" on /usr/share, "mv" cannot move files between the two dirs without copying them. That "might" be ok, except that "du -sh /usr/share/fonts /home/share/fonts/" sees them as 1 directory. Why does "mv" fail to rename (vs. physical copy) when "du" sees them as the same directory -- (and only lists the first one if trying to du both): Ishtar:/> du -sh /home/share/fonts/. /usr/share/fonts/. 8.8G /home/share/fonts/. Ishtar:/> du -sh /usr/share/fonts/. /home/share/fonts/. 8.8G /usr/share/fonts/. --- Also, is it intentional to leave out args from the listing of "du" -- I know it doesn't double-count the space (by default), but I would have thought to see a 2nd entry w/0 space: Ishtar:/> du -sh /home/share/fonts/. /usr/share/fonts/. 8.8G /home/share/fonts/. 0 /usr/share/fonts/. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 11 04:20:12 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2019 09:20:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghsz6-0003jE-Fz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 04:20:12 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:42121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghsz2-0003ir-QL; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 04:20:09 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id y1so6512190plp.9; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5bwA5HBqIaCL5esJV/hcBYUR/PTs1R7JoUiWugKAi04=; b=WFV8M2ShtJV2N2X/EQgdPmHPLzCqRuNJRr0bn/EafZtravBmpE5m2u3p5FPDpCUeQy UUy2zqes8vKo74W8Jat8BbE7fpc0TrPF22h1CQqMFnijB3K3QYuSYDuT+7wwiJ1/pYo9 Y5eeXu4cNVR++X+PO4jZBBmDVJn+jVumYgiRIeXDYx2VxblAdqf8PP2WJMJH5UjuBbUs LUuFO+yBgo6ImYWfXejN6ApZYbXr2jDkxaL/tDpaw7zp1mUyjwjkWIkrGhcuHTuvFzFM +f7dMNN83SkCoQJaTrA3aJF5zo7aK9K4Y2iwKA+95WFav3TDRmW5shbqLhj0HLjCBhZy xNUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5bwA5HBqIaCL5esJV/hcBYUR/PTs1R7JoUiWugKAi04=; b=hnZhS7GnYvJSQKywv1nDZ0/SHu5sZhFh+NS1Oa+kRhPJ7PGkRlDzN0wx22vv11Q8pB GbiY/wf/d+ZgR3323B9r1AJFADY4dZ1MsxoHk6UIbZ3HH4dmOmXqvhWMQbhssoCQtmpl rINeygs5fOOzI78CBZCImv/kvuKSYfGwSUaF6h5zJ0q3uDeVSWNjk6b2E6sNHwwE49tF dnhr3JHuRwz7/xfIPss/4CsBIzNAU8NHKGe3evP0V1NKFKqCqCFzasJT03x8D56OgiOP Sy5FdyvGbYMT6gvguJJKQ4OjD1qrBrz6SMrDpY461ys6AcXIG6hpW3p/410BNUFAdWhi KULg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukd+bK/M3K7SnAm0X05buUnnZFLeL/aAPyOQAFvHqluqmGz3OIdF yoUS3Y+97GR38A61v/X8yYRJvklF X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6yR05+4O5HjO8YvdT9PF45nrfu93BkgH1zBRntbImzknpr8hmHnmkVTD52RvIaMD9l19gIBA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7581:: with SMTP id j1mr14010436pll.308.1547198402497; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from tomato.housegordon.com (moose.housegordon.com. [184.68.105.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w88sm139582568pfk.11.2019.01.11.01.20.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:20:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#15328: Bug or dubious feature? To: Linda Walsh References: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> From: Assaf Gordon Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:20:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 15328 notabug close 15328 stop Hello, On 2013-09-10 3:01 p.m., Linda Walsh wrote: > Whatever the problem is, it's not in 'mv'... Given the above, and no further comments in 5 years, I'm closing this item. regards, - assaf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 19 20:03:46 2019 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2019 01:03:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1Wc-0001I0-3C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1WZ-0001Hm-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:44 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:51592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1WU-0003z0-2y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1WT-0005H7-9c for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1WS-0003xo-JD for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:37 -0500 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([173.164.175.65]:33590 helo=Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gl1WP-0003te-Ru for bug-coreutils@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 20:03:36 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.12] (Athenae [192.168.3.12]) by Ishtar.sc.tlinx.org (8.14.7/8.14.4/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id x0K13Osf084840; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:03:26 -0800 Message-ID: <5C43C8DC.3000706@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:03:24 -0800 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Assaf Gordon , Coreutils Subject: Re: bug#15328: Bug or dubious feature? References: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 173.164.175.65 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 1/11/2019 1:20 AM, Assaf Gordon wrote: > tags 15328 notabug > close 15328 > stop > > Hello, > > On 2013-09-10 3:01 p.m., Linda Walsh wrote: >> Whatever the problem is, it's not in 'mv'... > > Given the above, and no further comments in 5 years, > I'm closing this item. ---- There were further comments but, some Erik/eric, the cygwin person supporting core utils at the time refused to allow me to process the bugs through core utils before being "ok'd" / triaged by the cygwin interface person(him). This was a very serious bug that appeared in several other areas where "update" conflicted with read-only settings on sources that caused deletion of data off of sources that were marked as 'read-only'. Of course even after telling him how he could reproduce the bug on linux using the "ignore case" feature on XFS, he couldn't be bothered. I also got ignored when mentioning this was related to the "file changed as we read it" bug that kept resurfacing on some filesystem that never became stable enough on linux for a first release. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 20 13:09:24 2019 Received: (at 15328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2019 18:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1glHX9-0000NK-Qv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:09:24 -0500 Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:41100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1glHX8-0000N5-5d for 15328@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:09:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F94160FDA; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id znJ5xK6mrImb; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CE4160FF9; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZMVR44oItvCF; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-242-74-103.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.74.103]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE355160F96; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#15328: Bug or dubious feature? To: L A Walsh , assafgordon@gmail.com, 15328@debbugs.gnu.org References: <522F85A5.4080101@tlinx.org> <522F88A1.2080602@tlinx.org> <5C43C8DC.3000706@tlinx.org> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:09:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5C43C8DC.3000706@tlinx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15328 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) L A Walsh wrote: > This was a very serious bug that appeared in several > other areas Yes, this appears to be a mount problem that affects many programs, not a coreutils problem per se. The discrepancy that you observed between "mv" and "du" could be explained by the fact that "mv a/b c/d" changes C and also looks at A's and C's device number, whereas "du a/b c/d" needs to look only at A/B's and C/D's device number. So I don't see a bug. And anyway, the mount is the real problem here. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:46:02 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator