From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:41 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#15310 <15310@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#15310 <15310@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream authors Reply-To: bug#15310 <15310@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:53:41 +0000 retitle 15310 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream auth= ors reassign 15310 emacs submitter 15310 Dmitry Gutov severity 15310 wishlist tag 15310 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Sep 08 17:57:24 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2013 21:57:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyy-0002RT-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:57:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41959) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyw-0002RH-A3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:57:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyi-0001lp-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:57:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyi-0001lj-By for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:57:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyZ-0002J9-S3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:57:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyR-0001jj-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:56:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::233]:51284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VImyQ-0001jM-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:56:51 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c1so2768313eek.10 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=0Lpp9xmzSqTuakIrOsGrQFVMYb5DsmWrU8xoJFjnNbc=; b=foAWARGeGF/0Jk3CFkcrIgAbkkaAngG/LzoroKzy9yulrdJr4ftI9fTD0W0Ao8BHWc RC/tNhQBOODy7o43S01rCgJ0Zfu3SG5l+jeGXSWIghqpbVbjRJaI2rS1ojvAZpdV1Wcw 2A+z77B4fXC0Fc7+KwfyYEMupUYiTkXPtyBOJr11yezjQhbOurCiuQGIc0FHxykXY6f0 pBmXelBaGrAKw6ISOHaaGtoeJyB5X+T2g3ogztMDTd4KbCxWTe/oGthOxDX3eEa2tIvj D1ZX0Hz0bqqes6H5iYWUHbdHR+wMEcaNJrJOGnUL0TL17z3/JaHEmKUSxjriYf0BDx+d YJDQ== X-Received: by 10.15.48.197 with SMTP id h45mr25064039eew.0.1378677408290; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axl (62-118-214.netrun.cytanet.com.cy. [62.228.118.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b45sm16926606eef.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:56:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmitry Gutov To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream authors Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:56:40 +0300 Message-ID: <871u4znfjb.fsf@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Currently, when there are some changes made to a package that has an upstream, an email gets sent for each group of commits pushed, to upstream author (or authors, I'm assuming). When the notification does come, getting the required changes out is not as easy as it could be. The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. I have to identify the ones that originated from ELPA, and weren't synced from upstream, or just sync commits, for each of them copy the diff to a file manually, and separately copy the message and the author when making the commit. Since all paths the such diffs contain "a/packages/", I also have to run a replace command before applying the diff. Is there a better way to work with these emails? If no, it would be better if, for example, the script preparing these emails identified commits not synced from upstream (maybe by file paths inside the diffs?), fixed the paths, and attached these commits in patch format that's accepted by 'git am' and already contains the commit message and author information. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 11 13:09:26 2013 Received: (at 15310) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2013 17:09:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJnuv-0007jU-Ke for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:25 -0400 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60181) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VJnut-0007jM-OB for 15310@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:24 -0400 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r8BH9Mkl001654; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:22 -0400 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7B9E9B40D3; Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Dmitry Gutov Subject: Re: bug#15310: 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream authors Message-ID: References: <871u4znfjb.fsf@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871u4znfjb.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 09 Sep 2013 00:56:40 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4698=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4698> : inlines <81> : streams <1035606> : uri <1533816> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15310 Cc: 15310@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) > The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, > AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. Indeed. That's basically what Savannah's email notification gives us (we can somewhat tweak it, the current config can be seen in http://git.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/elpa.git/config, although we do not have direct write access to it). > Is there a better way to work with these emails? "patch -p2" will strip off the "a/packages/" prefix. > If no, it would be better if, for example, the script preparing these > emails identified commits not synced from upstream (maybe by file paths > inside the diffs?), fixed the paths, and attached these commits in patch > format that's accepted by 'git am' and already contains the commit > message and author information. There's a copy of the script I use in elpa/admin/forward-diffs.py. Improvements are welcome. This said, I try to "push" the syncs separately from local changes, so that an email should either contain a "sync" that you can completely disregard, or only local changes. This should be even more true once I get a new cron job that does the syncs semi-automatically (i.e. automatically when there's no conflict). In that case you should be able to pass the whole email to "patch -p2". Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 30 02:01:06 2021 Received: (at 15310) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2021 06:01:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58251 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVW-0005jN-Cf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:01:06 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVT-0005c2-VH for 15310@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:01:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jXAV+6VS/UTdJj+vA3zJK0oSf5SlZ6xU0q0XH+oc3OM=; b=drCPkEFAI/CiNx7rRBq6PD+rLQ YRB+UFyIiOke9R1GOU03f57ogd5qPFQYeVcVJoNi+Y/3jV87VEv4rKLql8ZhkY8qXyet/qAME0eEs S2LPywrPehKdP3wWIDHvBWzM1Di8ZT1FZ756dU7C3Xbor9EgH/XbI/T4UUyVj/9f+q7I=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVL-0006xS-6j; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:00:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15310: 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream authors References: <871u4znfjb.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Now-Playing: Alva Noto and Ryuichi Sakamoto's _Two_: "Kizuna (Live)" Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:00:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:09:22 -0400") Message-ID: <877djg3gmh.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, >> AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. > > Indeed. That's basically what Savannah's email notification gives us > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15310 Cc: 15310@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Monnier writes: >> The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, >> AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. > > Indeed. That's basically what Savannah's email notification gives us > (we can somewhat tweak it, the current config can be seen in > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/elpa.git/config, although we do not > have direct write access to it). This was seven years ago -- is this still an issue? (I haven't looked at any upstream notification emails.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 30 02:01:11 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2021 06:01:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58254 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVa-0005no-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:01:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVZ-0005hV-Dy for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 02:01:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cNODZ4mNU5zv1kaHCYyZ4uFm3PeUtG/kq0sUXK4MqlA=; b=Xd/wn9zQ1vXZjDfw5gA5kleAuA oGGK8iO9f0tTq7AG0PTUu3x0tYCEOwNBguadHSL/P1ct7ewcOPPV5aukXKUFH9K/FOU2jpllS+LT5 ddWPsyOPjVqpEg2FxBdfgAUt+F9FfNM/5STLyBx2dJb+Uratbgq95HgQmAYFA8MWAe1E=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lnEVR-0006xc-QD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:01:03 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:01:01 +0200 Message-Id: <875yz03gma.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15310 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 15310 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 15310 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 02 07:15:46 2021 Received: (at 15310) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 11:15:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH98-0007IB-CJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:15:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH95-0007Aq-SW for 15310@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:15:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=0YJ1JXK1LNbgV2bvoGI6XRA792ziU3TMKJdcPOxir74=; b=HHmFXLcdqTXkoRVVrVclx4gE5Q 6hUgo+ZRJSdVhZZ1L/Bx8lMI0N3FQXN3Tf4Jn34lymw+bPbkRPbggFL621YMgFUeTnORSEqeGTBjo zn3TJcMdEgfm6w+nqX+o06H3DcH3wqRKwr9ZEqO9KBJJsbPPEodY+7zUsVv6AW6fuceQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH8w-00085F-Pr; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:15:37 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15310: 24.3.50; [ELPA] Better commit notifications for upstream authors References: <871u4znfjb.fsf@yandex.ru> <877djg3gmh.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Katie Gately's _The Wire Tapper 52_: "Waltz" Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:15:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877djg3gmh.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 30 May 2021 08:00:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87sg0xufu1.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, >>> AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. >> >> Indeed. That [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15310 Cc: 15310@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> The commits are all sent together (one notification email per push, >>> AFAICS), as a plain-text email without attachments. >> >> Indeed. That's basically what Savannah's email notification gives us >> (we can somewhat tweak it, the current config can be seen in >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/r/emacs/elpa.git/config, although we do not >> have direct write access to it). > > This was seven years ago -- is this still an issue? (I haven't looked > at any upstream notification emails.) There was no response, so I guess there'll be no further progress here, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 02 07:15:49 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 11:15:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH9A-0007KU-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:15:48 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH99-0007EG-Hz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 07:15:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ezlZp+/F21Ll1a6rwg83Xn7aphUPYZyU1XyQnng6EUQ=; b=JKIpbZDEwI/H77bgGFQ9ttEUV2 tcgB39KETdLkdYdwl0SOn8KxBWBDBNXdDdaSDuIwJEQ7LG8MsjdcJpYVkQ8ZXnQVL15Obfhvbtd7U jFLNRDd4e3KS3UTxVTLYsEMzSeIsggsDZ459QZl5PNrRq1bjQuAQnvBAAV/lnW6Q8TbQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lzH91-00085M-VG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:15:42 +0200 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:15:39 +0200 Message-Id: <87r1ghuftw.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15310 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 15310 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 15310 quit From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator