GNU bug report logs -
#15295
which-func-mode slow in long Python tuple
Previous Next
Reported by: Dale <dale <at> codefu.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 00:48:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: fgallina <at> gnu.org (Fabián Ezequiel Gallina)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #22 received at 15295-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Fixed in revno 115736.
Thanks Dale for such detailed recipe.
This patch banishes initial thoughts of `python-syntax-context' being a
bad idea. `python-syntax-context' is nothing than a thin semantic
wrapper over `syntax-ppss'. It makes code easier to grasp for newcomers
to Elisp and has almost no impact on itself, it's optional argument is a
`syntax-ppss' list which can be used instead to lower the amount of
calls to it (as it is happening in this new patch I've just committed).
The problem here was that `python-nav-beginning-of-statement' was coded
awfully (looking for the statement beginning line by line). Now it
should be extremely fast compared to that.
Using OP's suggested recipe, here are the elp results for when
which-func is triggered inside the big tuple:
python-info-current-defun 2 0.003719249 0.0018596245
python-nav-beginning-of-defun 2 0.0036946010 0.0018473005
python-nav--beginning-of-defun 2 0.003685751 0.0018428755
python-nav-backward-block 2 0.001836524 0.000918262
python-nav-forward-block 2 0.0018315750 0.0009157875
python-info-looking-at-beginning-of-defun 6 0.000889166 0.0001481943
python-nav-beginning-of-statement 4 0.000437251 0.0001093127
python-syntax-context-type 6 5.009e-06 8.348...e-07
And this is the benchmark-run result: (0.020715153 0 0.0)
Regards,
Fabián.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 229 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.