From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 05 04:42:47 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2013 08:42:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV9K-0008VL-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35183) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV9I-0008V1-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV94-0006FR-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:39 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV94-0006FN-QL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV8w-0001HF-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV8j-0006C6-Nl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]:50088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHV8j-0006Ay-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:42:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so1514469pdj.15 for ; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 01:42:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=xSEt6DWfp/hbNj0AT7dMmEslryuMlXmawqpNRq5N+AI=; b=Fag8KRw3MVb4NDt97FJVqayv1Mlgx4yoLa+Ei26voiylZeMOYmBfZ6UoWnVhKqCA8d 1Zzpd9i5NHzcRsKdZFSMq6VA7QtKedu7qmwX+sztMU4iT7D+aildNrN/45eGh2pyzg/y YlfZuZ/rFFk/b4wpHJJHSHFbBF9a7Ey8DLcU4F902OhygmdIsBvkJ5aqyi70KVt15w/m sytZid+UcexUfAN3yGCjvr4iiFR4Iv+lJFrjK+RuDI+i6mdZ7LD9m3W6/f4k/rvmp7mp Y1LJm6/yMOrO4/mkXNucJOwXicZyeNBrx9sqR7+CB0bYJ566NNdOWDCjjCCfRU0QVKuh z3/g== X-Received: by 10.66.228.38 with SMTP id sf6mr8134770pac.21.1378370528068; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 01:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from porunai ([115.242.162.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nj9sm34126587pbc.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Sep 2013 01:42:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Jambunathan K To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:14:21 +0530 Message-ID: <877gevwtcq.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. Specifically move the following lines - seen just above `diary-face-attrs' - either to the docstring and Info the manual. ;; Face markup of calendar and diary displays: Any entry line that ;; ends with [foo:value] where foo is a face attribute (except :box ;; :stipple) or with [face:blah] tags, will have these values ;; applied to the calendar and fancy diary displays. These ;; attributes "stack" on calendar displays. File-wide attributes ;; can be defined as follows: the first line matching "^# ;; [tag:value]" defines the value for that particular tag. The defcustoms that pertain to color coding - diary-glob-file-regexp-prefix, diary-face-attrs - do not give any clue on what they are for and how they may be used. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 14 23:11:54 2013 Received: (at 15271-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2013 04:11:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhAl8-00009q-11 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:11:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:51209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhAl6-00009X-Cf for 15271-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:11:52 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y13so2943112pdi.13 for <15271-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:11:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=D14cdyJx78ChJWVWBQ01xPivvEfAgZS9LJT3tIQNCAg=; b=e0bRIQoFX9gCjly9eKpcbO/3BEtFVi3cR/ftnLq0Uw3Gwow4jkpOAKsjlojkkpiyOQ YsqO8idVjmQkyChN2MGLvsPTo81KDiGOVm4Y9Gkw3qgif3xwJ3K4hehZ+LYtL7MPLPFu 8Vx7tks1QVhLwfUbZI+bsKxDGIGTz5oJvsnalfRFhtEShJPsha/AjS1TfIzkV2SkD0if bgUr6crRYBKVHTWxiKcSeRyPeAYOdQL9T7F2Fir3MCobOIRGkKBSeIF4Qjcycg0EOmwN XR33jzoqsrvRCAVNDtfGq1Q6BKojFTI7uem/cdK3qhlNgeuudJ2X11umGK7AxS1g11Op MlgQ== X-Received: by 10.68.162.131 with SMTP id ya3mr4885469pbb.102.1384488706375; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.165.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ha10sm1277427pbd.17.2013.11.14.20.11.44 for <15271-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:11:45 -0800 (PST) From: Jambunathan K To: 15271-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#15271: Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. References: <877gevwtcq.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 06:14:46 +0530 In-Reply-To: <877gevwtcq.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:14:21 +0530") Message-ID: <873d1qx5kx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. Original developer made a change and didn't document it enough so that others can benefit from it. Why should I care? [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kjambunathan[at]gmail.com) 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.192.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15271-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. Original developer made a change and didn't document it enough so that others can benefit from it. Why should I care? [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.192.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kjambunathan[at]gmail.com) 2.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > Diary: Mention color coding of calendar and diary entries. Original developer made a change and didn't document it enough so that others can benefit from it. Why should I care? As OP, closing it. From unknown Wed Aug 20 05:17:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:24:25 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator