GNU bug report logs -
#15255
coreutils should requires "patch" command 2.6 or later
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#15255: coreutils should requires "patch" command 2.6 or later
which was filed against the coreutils package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 15255 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
15255: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15255
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On 09/03/2013 11:02 AM, FUJIWARA Katsunori wrote:
> With recent coreutils, "patch" command 2.5.9 causes failure of
> "./bootstrap" as below:
>
> gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** patch file gl/modules/tempname.diff didn't apply cleanly
> gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** Stop.
> missing header for unified diff at line 12 of patch
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |
> | Files:
> | lib/tempname.c
> --------------------------
> File to patch: EOF
> Skip this patch? [y]
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored
> gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** patch file gl/modules/tempname.diff didn't apply cleanly
> gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** Stop.
> ./bootstrap[348]: build-aux/prefix-gnulib-mk: not found [No such file or directory]
> ./bootstrap: bootstrap_post_import_hook failed
>
> "patch" command 2.6 or later can avoid this error.
>
> "./bootstrap" should check not only availability of "patch" command,
> but also version of it.
>
> diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf
> index 0863590..2535b20 100644
> --- a/bootstrap.conf
> +++ b/bootstrap.conf
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ git 1.4.4
> gperf -
> gzip -
> makeinfo 4.13
> -patch -
> +patch 2.6
> perl 5.5
> rsync -
> tar -
Yikes.
This in fact looks like later versions of patch
do not diagnose the issues with the mangled patch.
They fuzz the first hunk and _ignore_ the second hunk??
If I adjust the patch like this then all patch
versions apply both hunks without issue:
-@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
+@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
I'll report the ignored hunk issue to patch authors.
thanks!
Pádraig.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
With recent coreutils, "patch" command 2.5.9 causes failure of
"./bootstrap" as below:
gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** patch file gl/modules/tempname.diff didn't apply cleanly
gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** Stop.
missing header for unified diff at line 12 of patch
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|
| Files:
| lib/tempname.c
--------------------------
File to patch: EOF
Skip this patch? [y]
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** patch file gl/modules/tempname.diff didn't apply cleanly
gnulib/gnulib-tool: *** Stop.
./bootstrap[348]: build-aux/prefix-gnulib-mk: not found [No such file or directory]
./bootstrap: bootstrap_post_import_hook failed
"patch" command 2.6 or later can avoid this error.
"./bootstrap" should check not only availability of "patch" command,
but also version of it.
diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf
index 0863590..2535b20 100644
--- a/bootstrap.conf
+++ b/bootstrap.conf
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ git 1.4.4
gperf -
gzip -
makeinfo 4.13
-patch -
+patch 2.6
perl 5.5
rsync -
tar -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[FUJIWARA Katsunori] foozy <at> lares.dti.ne.jp
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 262 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.