GNU bug report logs - #15254
[PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#15254: closed ([PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 01:21:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:20:39 +0800
with message-id <CAAF+z6FmjOvG09DkniejJFe6WOdGkK4UH0t_2Lg8XJt2WiyiAA <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#15254: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15254,
regarding [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
15254: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15254
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:53:20 +0800

tags patch

I made a patch for glossary.texi, inspired by this thread:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00020.html

This patch "hyperlinks directly to an explanation of the term in
question, rather than just saying "which see" or some such English
alternative to q.v.".

-- 
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
To: 15254-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15254: [PATCH] Use anchor in glossary.texi
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 09:20:39 +0800

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote:

Hi Lars,

> Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I made a patch for glossary.texi, inspired by this thread:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00020.html
>>
>> This patch "hyperlinks directly to an explanation of the term in
>> question, rather than just saying "which see" or some such English
>> alternative to q.v.".
>
> I think we forgot to apply this patch -- it looks good to me.  But, of
> course, it no longer applies now, two years later.
>
> Could you respin the patch and re-send, and I'll apply it?

I'm not sure whether this patch is useful.  See the discussion starting
at: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-09/msg00048.html

BTW, I've been too busy these days, so I'll close this bug for now.

Thank you.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.