GNU bug report logs - #15230
24.3; Inconsistency in Tools menu

Previous Next

Full log

Message #11 received at 15230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 15230 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 "neutrico.pl Marcin Antczak" <marcin.antczak <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#15230: 24.3; Inconsistency in Tools menu
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:27:55 +0100

Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> There is "Games" position in "Tools" menu.
>> I'm not sure if it should belong to this menu.
>
> I see your point, but I'm not sure where else to put it.
>
>> Another problem is that in "Tools" menu there are toggle type buttons
>> such as:
>
>> - Project Support (EDE)
>> - Source Code Parsers (Semantic)
>
>> These options are not "tools".  They do nothing functional.  They are
>> just turning some features on and off but have no immediate
>> functional meaning.
>
>> Another problem is that we have more similar options to add there and
>> this could turn into an extensible and almost unlimited list of
>> external features available to turn on and off.
>
> I guess we could move them to Options, but the toggles in Options tend
> to be of a different nature (basically UI preferences), whereas the EDE and
> Semantic are really toggles to turn on some tool, simply because those
> tools aren't quite tuned enough yet to always "just work", so turning
> them on unconditionally would lead to complaints.
>
>> We could add positions such as:
>> - Code Browser
>
> Not sure what package/function/feature that would refer to.
>
>> - Code Snippets
>
> These are usually enabled already.
>
>> - Syntax Checking
>
> You mean something like flymake?  This definitely falls in the same camp
> as EDE/Semantic, since it should also ideally be enabled by default, but
> there again, it's not polished/robust enough for that.
>
>> Then we will get a long and hard to navigate list of toggle buttons which
>> belong to "Options" menu rather than to "Tools".
>
> The Options menu is indeed problematic since Emacs has so many options:
> we can only keep in it a few options we consider to benefit from such
> a position (e.g. to make them easier to find for newcomers, or to make
> them easier to toggle at runtime).
>
>> Another solution is to move this list to submenu.
>> For example:
>> "Tools" -> "Features >> "
>
> That sounds like a good idea.  Tho it would have the downside that it
> would somewhat hide those features.

Having read the above 6 year old feature request, I don't see anything
actionable here.  Stefan M seems to have already answered all relevant
points, and there have been no further comments.

I'll give it a couple of weeks, so anyone interested will have a last
chance to chime in, and then I'm closing this bug.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.