GNU bug report logs -
#15173
[cp] --link overrides dereference settings
Previous Next
Reported by: Gian Piero Carrubba <gpiero <at> rm-rf.it>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:55:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Merged with 23120
Done: Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:59:28 +0100
with message-id <527C1B50.20708 <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
and subject line Re: bug#15173: [cp] --link overrides dereference settings
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #15173,
regarding [cp] --link overrides dereference settings
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
15173: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15173
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Please keep me in Cc: as I'm not subscribed.
I failed to find references to discussions about this (intended?)
behaviour, so I'm filing this report. Please forgive me if I've missed
something elementary.
$ echo testfile > file; ln -s file link; opts="-l -Ll -Hl";
for o in $opts; do cp $o link cp${o}; done;
ls -li
total 4
3358742 lrwxrwxrwx 4 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:27 cp-Hl -> file
3358742 lrwxrwxrwx 4 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:27 cp-Ll -> file
3358742 lrwxrwxrwx 4 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:27 cp-l -> file
3358741 -rw-r--r-- 1 gpiero gpiero 9 Aug 23 22:27 file
3358742 lrwxrwxrwx 4 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:27 link -> file
I would have expected both 'cp-Hl' and 'cp-Ll' to be hardlinked to
'file', not to 'link'.
$ cp --version | head -n1
cp (GNU coreutils) 8.21
$ uname -a
Linux caimano 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.5-1 (2013-08-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ readlink -f /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.17.so
A tentative draft patch is attached. It still lacks unit tests and a way
to determine if the implementation of linkat() supports flags.
But most of all, please note that I'm not fully aware of the
implications (including portability issues) of such a change.
AFAICS, at least in one case the patch changes the behaviour of cp:
$ echo testfile > file; ln -s file link;
cp -l link cp-l.old; ../src/cp -l link cp-l.new;
ls -li
total 8
8912975 -rw-r--r-- 2 gpiero gpiero 9 Aug 23 22:58 cp-l.new
8913010 lrwxrwxrwx 2 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:58 cp-l.old -> file
8912975 -rw-r--r-- 2 gpiero gpiero 9 Aug 23 22:58 file
8913010 lrwxrwxrwx 2 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 22:58 link -> file
This is caused by the following code:
$ tail -n+1135 src/cp.c | head -n8
if (x.dereference == DEREF_UNDEFINED)
{
if (x.recursive)
/* This is compatible with FreeBSD. */
x.dereference = DEREF_NEVER;
else
x.dereference = DEREF_ALWAYS;
}
Not sure why this snippet is there[0], but it seems to me that it leads
to inconsistent behaviour:
$ echo testfile > file; ln -s file link;
cp link cp; cp -r link cp-r;
ls -li
total 8
3358743 -rw-r--r-- 1 gpiero gpiero 9 Aug 23 23:06 cp
3358744 lrwxrwxrwx 1 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 23:06 cp-r -> file
3358741 -rw-r--r-- 1 gpiero gpiero 9 Aug 23 23:06 file
3358742 lrwxrwxrwx 1 gpiero gpiero 4 Aug 23 23:06 link -> file
I think it is counterintuitive that '--recursive' had effects on the
referentiation of the link.[1]
Anyway, given that x.dereference is set to DEREF_ALWAYS, I think the
modified behaviour of `cp -l` could be considered correct.
Thanks,
Gian Piero.
[0] I suspect this is for backward compatibility. In principle, I think
DEREF_UNDEF should always set DEREF_NEVER, but this change would modify
a common, and well spread, behaviour.
[1] The same stands for '--link', as demonstrated in the first example,
when 'cp-l' has been created as a hardlink to the symlink (even if for
different reasons: in that case DEREF_ALWAYS was in place, but linkat()
didn't follow the symlink).
[draft.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On 11/07/2013 03:09 PM, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> * [Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:14:05AM +0000] Pádraig Brady:
>> I.E. IMHO your current patch is fine and good.
>
> Fair enough. In this case please also update the documentation.
Good idea, thanks.
I pushed it in your name (together with Padraig's notes regarding
NEWS and the test case):
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=bf6bf52d
I'm hereby marking the bug as done.
Thanks again.
Have a nice day,
Berny
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 206 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.