GNU bug report logs - #15173
[cp] --link overrides dereference settings

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 15173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail <at> bernhard-voelker.de>
Cc: Gian Piero Carrubba <gpiero <at> rm-rf.it>, Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>,
 15173 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15173: [cp] --link overrides dereference settings
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:47:32 +0000

On 10/31/2013 01:17 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> On October 31, 2013 at 1:12 PM Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com> wrote:
>> That all seems consistent with expectations and what we previously discussed.
>>
>> But...
>>
>> I've just now read POSIX for cp, and it states:
>>
>>   "If the -R option was not specified, cp shall take actions based on the type
>>    and contents of the file referenced by the symbolic link, and not by the
>>    symbolic link itself, unless the -P option was specified."
>>
>> This suggests that -HL should only be significant with -R ?
>> That is a bit surprising TBH. What do you think Eric?
>>
>> It also suggests that we should hardlink to a symlink only with -P,
>> i.e. that we should AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW unless -P is specified ?
>> That's also a bit surprising, given that POSIX for ln states
>> that it's implementation defined what's done if neither -P or -L is specified.
>> I wouldn't be inclined to follow POSIX in that regard.
> 
> I don't read the POSIX spec that way: there are 2 things to consider:
> a) POSIX doesn't say a word about hard links, and
> b) the -l,--link option is a GNU extension to conveniently
>    copy files or trees by creating hard links (only).
> 
> I.e. if someone uses -l, then the POSIX semantics does not
> apply anymore because we do not copy anymore.  Whether the
> ln(1) specification does apply more here is another question.
> 
> Therefore, I think GNU cp(1) should do what makes most sense
> for the user - depending on -LPH or none being used.  With the
> proposed patch, I think we're getting a bit closer to that.

OK cool. With that cp and ln will be more consistent with each other anyway.

thanks,
Pádraig.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.