GNU bug report logs - #15103
Spurious "unused lexical argument" warning from condition-case

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>

Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:51:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Merged with 20123

Found in versions 24.3.50, 24.4.91

Fixed in version 25.1

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 15103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 15103 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15103: 24.3.50; Wrong byte compiler warning
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:50:25 -0400
> I have a file test.el:
> (condition-case err
>     (ignore)
>   (file-error (ignore))
>   (error (message "%s" (error-message-string err))))

> When I compile it with --eval '(setq byte-compile-force-lexical-warnings t)'
> I get the byte compiler warning

> In toplevel form:
> test.el:1:1:Warning: Unused lexical argument `err'
> Wrote /home/albinus/tmp/test.elc

> Note, that this warning does not appear when the first condition-case
> handler does not exist.

Yup, same kind of problem as discussed in the "Cleaning up code" thread.
When compiling for lexical scoping, the condition case above gets turned
internally into something akin to:

 (condition-case :use-lexical-calling-convention
     (ignore)
   (file-error (lambda (err) (ignore)))
   (error (lambda (err) (message "%s" (error-message-string err)))))

so as you can see, we now have two separate declarations of `err' one of
which is unused.
There's a secondary bug as well in that the warning says "argument"
rather than "variable", but that's minor.


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 10 years and 72 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.