GNU bug report logs - #15085
Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:42:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: patch

Fixed in version 24.4

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#15085: closed (Re: bug#15085: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro)
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 01:20:06 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#15085: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 15085 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
15085: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=15085
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 15085-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#15085: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 21:19:01 -0400
Version: 24.4

Thanks; applied.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Dani Moncayo <dmoncayo <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Doc Fix for the Emacs Lips Intro
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:40:52 +0200
Hi,

The following patch adapts one example (and its explanation) to the
current code.


--- emacs-lisp-intro.texi 2013-08-13 12:14:44 +0200
+++ emacs-lisp-intro.texi 2013-08-13 12:32:36 +0200
@@ -6323,7 +6323,7 @@
                         (/ (+ 10 (* size (prefix-numeric-value arg)))
                            10)))
                  (point-min))))
-  (if arg (forward-line 1)))
+  (if (and arg (not (consp arg))) (forward-line 1)))
 @end group
 @end smallexample

@@ -6390,7 +6390,7 @@
 invoked with an argument:

 @smallexample
-(if arg (forward-line 1)))
+(if (and arg (not (consp arg))) (forward-line 1))
 @end smallexample

 @noindent
@@ -6401,13 +6401,6 @@
 perhaps, not necessary, but which, if it did not occur, would be sure
 to draw complaints.

-On the other hand, it also means that if you specify the command with
-a @kbd{C-u}, but without a number, that is to say, if the `raw prefix
-argument' is simply a cons cell, then the command puts you at the
-beginning of the second line @dots{}  I don't know whether this is
-intended or whether no one has dealt with the code to avoid this
-happening.
-
 @node Second Buffer Related Review
 @section Review



-- 
Dani Moncayo



This bug report was last modified 11 years and 323 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.