From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:06:47 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#15006 <15006@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#15006 <15006@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping Reply-To: bug#15006 <15006@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:06:47 +0000 retitle 15006 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping reassign 15006 emacs submitter 15006 Kevin Ryde severity 15006 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 20:49:42 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2013 00:49:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V53Yr-00056n-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57787) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V53Yo-00056F-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V53YZ-0002q5-D3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:33 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V53YZ-0002q1-AY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V53YQ-0003U6-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V53YI-0002kq-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:14 -0400 Received: from mailout2-12.pacific.net.au ([125.255.80.139]:46330 helo=mailout4-syd3.pacific.net.au) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V53YI-0002k9-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 20:49:06 -0400 Received: from mailproxy4-syd3.pacific.net.au (mailproxy4-syd3.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout4-syd3.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C5C470D1A for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:49:00 +1000 (EST) Received: from blah.blah (unknown [203.26.175.75]) by mailproxy4-syd3.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27982C025 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:48:59 +1000 (EST) Received: from gg by blah.blah with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V53Xo-0005rB-Bg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:48:36 +1000 From: Kevin Ryde To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:48:36 +1000 Message-ID: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) In the emacs manual info node "(emacs)Options for Comments" an example comment-start-skip is given "\\(//+\\|/\\*+\\)\\s *" If I understand the comment-start-skip docstring correctly a \(..\) group is for extra distinguishing text preceding the comment. Should that example be a shy group, or perhaps expanded out to ungroup like vera-mode.el has? "/\\*+ *\\|//+ *" I also wondered whether the whitespace "\\s *" in the example was a little too loose since it matches \n and leading whitespace of the next line too. Does that matter to anything? In GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2013-05-29 on blah.blah, modified by Debian System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 (wheezy) Configured using: `configure '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--build' 'i486-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.3/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.3/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp' '--with-crt-dir=/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=lucid' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars' '--without-gconf' 'build_alias=i486-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-znocombreloc' 'CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2'' Important settings: value of $LANG: en_AU locale-coding-system: iso-latin-1-unix default enable-multibyte-characters: t From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 21:35:06 2013 Received: (at 15006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2013 01:35:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V54Gn-0006wr-6k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:35:05 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:17422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V54Gl-0006wC-Bj for 15006@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:35:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="20398480" Received: from 184-175-13-230.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.13.230]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Aug 2013 21:34:50 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 203FB63C70; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:34:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Kevin Ryde Subject: Re: bug#15006: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping Message-ID: References: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:34:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:48:36 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15006 Cc: 15006@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > If I understand the comment-start-skip docstring correctly a \(..\) > group is for extra distinguishing text preceding the comment. Should > that example be a shy group, Indeed, thank you. > I also wondered whether the whitespace "\\s *" in the example was a > little too loose since it matches \n and leading whitespace of the next > line too. Does that matter to anything? Yes, I prefer to stay away from "whitepace syntax" for that reason and would recommend [ \t]* in its stead. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 21:50:38 2013 Received: (at 15006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2013 01:50:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V54Vo-00008x-Gm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:50:37 -0400 Received: from mailout1-11.pacific.net.au ([125.255.80.130]:43988 helo=mailout3-syd3.pacific.net.au) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V54Vl-00008l-94 for 15006@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:50:35 -0400 Received: from mailproxy3-syd3.pacific.net.au (mailproxy3-syd3.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.164]) by mailout3-syd3.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965CD3A1D1F; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:50:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from blah.blah (unknown [203.26.175.75]) by mailproxy3-syd3.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2168657808A; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:50:25 +1000 (EST) Received: from gg by blah.blah with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V54VE-00019d-Ll; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:50:00 +1000 From: Kevin Ryde To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15006: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping References: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:50:00 +1000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:34:57 -0400") Message-ID: <8738qsx3nb.fsf@blah.blah> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15006 Cc: 15006@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Stefan Monnier writes: > >> If I understand the comment-start-skip docstring correctly a \(..\) >> group is for extra distinguishing text preceding the comment. Should >> that example be a shy group, > > Indeed, thank you. Actually I see the cc-mode code uses it with a group. And js.el too (perhaps copying cc-mode). Does it have some subtle effect of skipping the /*, or is it outright wrong? > Yes, I prefer to stay away from "whitepace syntax" for that reason and > would recommend [ \t]* in its stead. I suppose the intention is to pick up non-breaking spaces or whatever other flavours of whitespace. Unlikely to arise in practice in programming language stuff. Is there an obvious ill effect? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 01 22:31:08 2013 Received: (at 15006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2013 02:31:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V5592-0001ld-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:31:08 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:19163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V558z-0001ky-T8 for 15006@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:31:06 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="20400346" Received: from 184-175-13-230.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.13.230]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Aug 2013 22:30:53 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A894B63C70; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 22:30:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Kevin Ryde Subject: Re: bug#15006: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping Message-ID: References: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> <8738qsx3nb.fsf@blah.blah> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:30:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8738qsx3nb.fsf@blah.blah> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:50:00 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15006 Cc: 15006@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > Actually I see the cc-mode code uses it with a group. And js.el too > (perhaps copying cc-mode). Does it have some subtle effect of skipping > the /*, or is it outright wrong? It's wrong. But cc-mode likes to reinvent the wheel, so maybe it doesn't use much of that code anyway. >> Yes, I prefer to stay away from "whitepace syntax" for that reason and >> would recommend [ \t]* in its stead. > I suppose the intention is to pick up non-breaking spaces or whatever > other flavours of whitespace. Unlikely to arise in practice in > programming language stuff. Is there an obvious ill effect? You can get things like (re-search-forward comment-start-skip) and end up with (match-end 0) past the end of the matched comment (e.g. when matching "//\n"). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 21 10:08:54 2021 Received: (at 15006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2021 14:08:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37613 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRg6-000341-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 10:08:54 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRg4-00033k-1U for 15006@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 10:08:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2Thw+rcqZ/diuyUj6sjHc1NxBn4qNNzffsA5+f3HObg=; b=hEUXCY5YmFmhjVTz4qTw1+AHq6 7jYftMytPNhDkqAl8HS0eL/8omZCvTyY5WJJn9mwdkZ/BBpl3eDqDIUVuRHNZ5sFQayfgOjlUHvSP 71sKMUD8Ry+3XN+SeQh2BCWTDHVSVhgVyRkUlQIwq7rmnHEBj03trKyAuZ4iOliV1nHc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRfW-0002LW-PU; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:08:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: bug#15006: 24.3; emacs manual comment-start-skip example grouping References: <87mwp0x6hn.fsf@blah.blah> <8738qsx3nb.fsf@blah.blah> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:08:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:30:59 -0400") Message-ID: <87tuji28ml.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I suppose the intention is to pick up non-breaking spaces or whatever >> other flavours of whitespace. Unlikely to arise in practice in >> programming language stuff. Is there an obvious ill effect [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 15006 Cc: 15006@debbugs.gnu.org, Kevin Ryde X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stefan Monnier writes: >> I suppose the intention is to pick up non-breaking spaces or whatever >> other flavours of whitespace. Unlikely to arise in practice in >> programming language stuff. Is there an obvious ill effect? > > You can get things like (re-search-forward comment-start-skip) and end > up with (match-end 0) past the end of the matched comment (e.g. when > matching "//\n"). I've now updated the example in the manual (as well as rearranged the \\| to match the order of the description of the regexp) in Emacs 28. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 21 10:08:35 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2021 14:08:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRfn-00033T-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 10:08:35 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:43682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRfl-00033F-R7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 10:08:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LFidHwMi2UbJyB1xYhXxztdxyl5wpa066yRcQNoUDkk=; b=NUbmQymkHnuXkxbCtfIy0/bxJG XK47/ZJ+cyftbSFUSDd8Ab8Ekkxf+T80sOdtIsXiv3faC/Iyq2rb1Ejhffs1e2l3UBGZnO4/RBVz9 QDkvAWVdvhEWA+WxzDRYSvbuo2j+nJHPeHLMQPSmpSKrBY1AAD7N+sdyXC3LUrmMGkpA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHRfd-0002Lm-Fk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:08:27 +0200 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 16:08:25 +0200 Message-Id: <87sfz228me.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #15006 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 15006 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 15006 28.1 quit From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:06:47 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator