GNU bug report logs -
#14871
flonum procedures returning non-flonum objects
Previous Next
Reported by: Göran Weinholt <goran <at> weinholt.se>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:45:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:53:49 -0400
with message-id <87bo6251ia.fsf <at> tines.lan>
and subject line Re: bug#14871: flonum procedures returning non-flonum objects
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14871,
regarding flonum procedures returning non-flonum objects
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
14871: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14871
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello schemers,
one property of the flonum procedures in r6rs is that they return
flonums. This should not happen:
scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
scheme@(guile-user)> (fllog -1.0)
$1 = 0.0+3.141592653589793i
scheme@(guile-user)> (flsqrt -1.0)
$2 = 0.0+1.0i
scheme@(guile-user)> (flasin 3.0)
$3 = 1.5707963267948966-1.762747174039086i
scheme@(guile-user)> (flacos 3.0)
$4 = 0.0+1.762747174039086i
scheme@(guile-user)> (flexpt -1.0 0.5)
$5 = 6.123031769111886e-17+1.0i
These results are not flonums. In r6rs-lib it says "the result may be a
NaN or some unspecified flonum." So returning +nan.0 would be better.
Tested with Guile 2.0.9.22-7e816-dirty.
Regards,
--
Göran Weinholt <goran <at> weinholt.se>
"Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander
off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has
no relation to reality." -- Nikola Tesla
[Message part 4 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Göran Weinholt <goran <at> weinholt.se> writes:
> one property of the flonum procedures in r6rs is that they return
> flonums. This should not happen:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (import (rnrs))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (fllog -1.0)
> $1 = 0.0+3.141592653589793i
> scheme@(guile-user)> (flsqrt -1.0)
> $2 = 0.0+1.0i
> scheme@(guile-user)> (flasin 3.0)
> $3 = 1.5707963267948966-1.762747174039086i
> scheme@(guile-user)> (flacos 3.0)
> $4 = 0.0+1.762747174039086i
> scheme@(guile-user)> (flexpt -1.0 0.5)
> $5 = 6.123031769111886e-17+1.0i
>
> These results are not flonums. In r6rs-lib it says "the result may be a
> NaN or some unspecified flonum." So returning +nan.0 would be better.
Fixed in ad922d065c5f8b01c4ace3ee34d26300409e44fa.
Thanks!
Mark
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 8 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.