Subject: bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:56:08 +0200

Andreas Politz <[email-masked]> writes:

>> I see no reason to keep both the old 10x slower version and the new fast
>> version.  
>
> Except for non-mail related packages/users.

Well, the old function is designed for parsing RFC822 Date headers...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/