Subject: bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance

From: Andreas Politz <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:50:14 +0200

Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:

> I see no reason to keep both the old 10x slower version and the new fast
> version.  

Except for non-mail related packages/users.

> The fast version could surely be made to parse all valid(ish) RFC822
> date headers?  I think there's a corpus of date headers to test with
> out there somewhere, but I can't find it at the moment..

I'll see if I can find it.

-ap