Subject: bug#14776: 24.3.50; [PATCH] parse-time-string performance

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:41:33 +0200

Andreas Politz <[email-masked]> writes:

> I should have tested this with -Q.  The reason is a customized
> gc-cons-percentage (0.2) and gc-cons-threshold (67108864).  Using the
> default values shows almost no difference anymore in gnus, i.e. both
> versions (stock and patched) need around ~10s.
>
> I suppose there are various lessons to learn from this endeavour.

:-)

But this reminds me: Why are we parsing data strings in Emacs Lisp at
all?  Doesn't libc (or gnulib) have date parsing functions?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/