Subject: Re: bug#1476: 23.0.60; spelling of (un)writeable should be (un)writable

From: "Juanma Barranquero" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:08:56 +0100

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:43, Drew Adams <[email-masked]> wrote:

> It's about general usage, in practice. Whether "both are fine" is really beside
> the point.

Googling for "writable -writeable" gets about 2,6 Mhits, while
"writeable -writable" gets around 0,9 Mhits. Fewer, but still sizable.
I don't think anyone has trouble understanding "writeable".

             Juanma