Subject: bug#14729: 24.3.50; Isearch oddity

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 21:22:29 +0100

Juri Linkov <[email-masked]> writes:

>> so I think it's correct to still say that we've skipped past, even if
>> we add more characters.  Probably.
>
> When the users type more characters on the wrapping search,
> isn't this an indication that the users changed their mind
> and decided to continue searching for more text?

Or...  perhaps they're building up the string for their next (wrapped)
`C-s'.  😀

> Honestly, I have no idea what is right and what is wrong in this situation 🤐

Me neither, but it's not quite optimal the way it is now.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no