GNU bug report logs - #14640
SA_RESTART prevents execution of signal handlers

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr (Ludovic Courtès)

Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:07:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: 14640-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#14640: SA_RESTART prevents execution of signal handlers
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:48:33 +0200
Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com> skribis:

> On Mon 17 Jun 2013 15:54, ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> When using SA_RESTART, signal handlers are never executed, as in this
>> example (checked on 2.0.9+):
>>
>> (sigaction SIGALRM
>>   (lambda (signum)
>>     (pk 'sig signum))
>>   SA_RESTART)
>> (alarm 3)
>> (pk 'char (read-char))
>>
>> Presumably this is because the read(2) syscall is automatically
>> restarted, leaving no chance for the handler async to run.
>
> Thinking about this a bit -- since we always handle signals
> asynchronously and have no intention of handling them synchronously,
> then we just have to document this behavior.  Done in e877e1b:

I think it’s problematic though.  With the current design, signal
delivery is unreliable (with or without SA_RESTART; what we observe with
SA_RESTART occurs similarly if you make a syscall right after queuing,
but not running, an async.)

The more I think about it, the more I think a different approach is
needed.  On GNU/Linux, signalfd(2) may be part of the solution.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 333 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.