From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:14:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#14631 <14631@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#14631 <14631@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Reply-To: bug#14631 <14631@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:14:57 +0000 retitle 14631 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt reassign 14631 emacs submitter 14631 Drew Adams severity 14631 normal tag 14631 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 16 02:04:36 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 06:04:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47460 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64p-00057X-MF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64n-00057F-Om for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64h-00020O-HH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TVD_SPACE_RATIO, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64h-00020G-EE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64g-0006gj-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64f-0001zu-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:26 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:27992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uo64f-0001zn-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:04:25 -0400 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5G64Ofb029404 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:04:24 GMT Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5G64NgH026373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:04:23 GMT Received: from abhmt118.oracle.com (abhmt118.oracle.com [141.146.116.70]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5G64NKn029196 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:04:23 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:04:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.7 (607090) [OL 12.0.6668.5000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Backtrace: 0x012a35a7 0x012a3619 0x0112a3c0 0x011cd1bb 0x01299118 0x75d562f6 0x75d56d36 0x75d577c0 0x75d57886 0x01297914 0x01297bb3 0x774833a6 0x77be9eee 0x77be9ec1 Backtrace: 0x012a35a7 0x012a3619 0x0113ec1a 0x0113ec32 0x012c002f 0x012c00af 0x010186be 0x01043326 0x01042f1e 0x011e46d4 0x011f1a04 0x01256e20 0x011f2c0f 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f2c0f 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x01256e20 0x011f2c0f 0x011f20c8 0x011efe42 0x011edada 0x01257af0 0x011f2c0f 0x011f20c8 0x011f13d0 0x011e97fb 0x011f1d81 0x01256e20 0x011f27a7 0x011f20c8 0x011f1459 0x0112f548 0x011edbba 0x0112e4ff 0x011ed61a 0x0112e4b7 0x0112da61 0x0112dd9c 0x0112b950 0x010010f9 0x774833a6 0x77be9eee 0x77be9ec1 In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2013-06-13 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 112978 xfq.free@gmail.com-20130613224333-3yfl8navh3c1vmxy Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --prefix=3D/c/Devel/emacs/binary --enable-checking=3Dyes,glyphs CFLAGS=3D'-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=3D'-Ic:/Devel/emacs/include' LDFLAGS=3D'-Lc:/Devel/emacs/lib'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 16 06:19:22 2013 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 10:19:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoA3M-0000Us-K1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:19:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:46586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoA3K-0000UT-5L for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:19:19 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z15so1178168ead.7 for <14631@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7s8yQaArlSGYtD2iBAgKZGFX2NK8R7ljP4Me6tVo/fE=; b=jwM0taNQe5yPNK755p+Q4wNp6UJuTr3zQ1fY+9Doo/SHQ/C1kg0Aj+T+USg3Bzfu3P 4J3Lwa4Z5kegGM/jTVau8mbc4c47slmwNBpUA05/A/zEHs3ZgWZLGRO/MgQ4qh7cfM47 JW/66d3l1atQwHpNBHsmRD8b8fnLdriJoZYYgkdzSdltyxD6qd/SWPx3r/GDR0d6G2Ca krXyUo72CS0tfde2wK59X4tIf2JuinYITfBQ/OHUT+iCIUBlPsL+NBgCZJV58F6M8veD UeKBS3cq8apF5pG9+AI1ag4BrD0MMrk08C9nRsC0KfiALTFGKi53OUc5tD86m6iSN0Pp salQ== X-Received: by 10.15.76.71 with SMTP id m47mr11411336eey.70.1371377952256; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:19:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.142.4 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:18:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:18:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt To: Drew Adams Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > Backtrace: 0x00000bac: ?? ??:0 0x012a35a7: w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7740 0x012a3619: emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7772 0x0112a3c0: terminate_due_to_signal at emacs.c:343 0x011cd1bb: die at alloc.c:6509 0x01299118: w32_wnd_proc at w32fns.c:3188 0x75d562f6: ?? ??:0 0x75d56d36: ?? ??:0 0x75d577c0: ?? ??:0 0x75d57886: ?? ??:0 0x01297914: w32_msg_pump at w32fns.c:2517 0x01297bb3: w32_msg_worker@4 at w32fns.c:2643 0x774833a6: ?? ??:0 0x77be9eee: ?? ??:0 0x77be9ec1: ?? ??:0 > Backtrace: 0x00000bac: ?? ??:0 0x012a35a7: w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7740 0x012a3619: emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7772 0x0113ec1a: unblock_input_to at keyboard.c:7121 0x0113ec32: unblock_input at keyboard.c:7132 0x012c002f: x_raise_frame at w32term.c:5926 0x012c00af: w32_frame_raise_lower at w32term.c:5948 0x010186be: Fraise_frame at frame.c:1777 0x01043326: message3_nolog at xdisp.c:9704 0x01042f1e: message3 at xdisp.c:9659 0x011e46d4: Fmessage at editfns.c:3462 0x011f1a04: Ffuncall at eval.c:2692 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f2c0f: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2945 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f2c0f: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2945 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f2c0f: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2945 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x011efe42: eval_sub at eval.c:2053 0x011edada: internal_lisp_condition_case at eval.c:1169 0x01257af0: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:1099 0x011f2c0f: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2945 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x011f13d0: apply1 at eval.c:2477 0x011e97fb: Fcall_interactively at callint.c:381 0x011f1d81: Ffuncall at eval.c:2718 0x01256e20: exec_byte_code at bytecode.c:903 0x011f27a7: funcall_lambda at eval.c:2879 0x011f20c8: Ffuncall at eval.c:2760 0x011f1459: call1 at eval.c:2510 0x0112f548: command_loop_1 at keyboard.c:1575 0x011edbba: internal_condition_case at eval.c:1214 0x0112e4ff: command_loop_2 at keyboard.c:1164 0x011ed61a: internal_catch at eval.c:988 0x0112e4b7: command_loop at keyboard.c:1143 0x0112da61: recursive_edit_1 at keyboard.c:776 0x0112dd9c: Frecursive_edit at keyboard.c:840 0x0112b950: main at emacs.c:1543 0x010010f9: ?? at crt1.c:0 0x774833a6: ?? ??:0 0x77be9eee: ?? ??:0 0x77be9ec1: ?? ??:0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 17 12:33:52 2013 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2013 16:33:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocNL-000705-3t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:33:52 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocNI-0006zr-II for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:33:48 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOJ00200PLBKG00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:33:42 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOJ002T3Q06G850@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:33:42 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:33:45 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Juanma Barranquero Message-id: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:18:32 +0200 > Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org > > 0x012a35a7: w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7740 > 0x012a3619: emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7772 > 0x0113ec1a: unblock_input_to at keyboard.c:7121 > 0x0113ec32: unblock_input at keyboard.c:7132 This is because we somehow call unblock_input more than we call block_input. Do we have any facilities to find out where this happens? Stefan? anyone? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 17 12:41:46 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2013 16:41:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocUz-0007Kp-Up for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:41:46 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocUw-0007KK-2d; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:41:43 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOJ00B00Q9XZ200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:41:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOJ00BH9QDBX740@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:41:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:41:37 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14641: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Juanma Barranquero Message-id: <83vc5csn9a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8677a52b-ea8a-455c-86fa-a2ec1773fb51@default> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 14641@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 14641 14642 14631 thanks. > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:08:53 +0200 > Cc: 14641@debbugs.gnu.org > > I could send you addr2line (a single executable, no dependencies) and > you would be able to generate the symbolic backtrace yourself... > > 0x00000bac: ?? > ??:0 > 0x012a35a7: w32_backtrace at w32fns.c:7740 > 0x012a3619: emacs_abort at w32fns.c:7772 > 0x0113ec1a: unblock_input_to at keyboard.c:7121 > 0x0113ec32: unblock_input at keyboard.c:7132 > 0x012c0641: x_free_frame_resources at w32term.c:6158 > 0x012c065b: x_destroy_window at w32term.c:6168 > 0x0101720f: delete_frame at frame.c:1297 > 0x01017743: Fdelete_frame at frame.c:1430 This bug and the next are all identical to 14631. Merged them. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 03:21:00 2013 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 07:21:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDq-0005Fx-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:20:59 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:63249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoqDo-0005FT-3k for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:20:56 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LfUwx-1UVV2h1LA1-00p3RZ for <14631@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:50 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2013 07:20:50 -0000 Received: from 62-47-59-141.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.141]) [62.47.59.141] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2013 09:20:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19p5VZ12atphUBjQ4hJrc3feAc2XG7boJxmv77My6 TzoD8Fc9q46CQ3 Message-ID: <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:41 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > This is because we somehow call unblock_input more than we call > block_input. Do we have any facilities to find out where this > happens? Stefan? anyone? Add parameters to block_input and unblock_input to remember where they were called from. I think that such an investment should pay off in the long run. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 12:02:11 2013 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 16:02:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyMF-0006yt-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:02:11 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoyMC-0006yZ-J8 for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:02:08 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOL00J00J6BHZ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:02 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOL00IUXJ7EZC90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:02 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:02:07 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: martin rudalics Message-id: <83ehbzs8zk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:41 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Juanma Barranquero , 14631@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This is because we somehow call unblock_input more than we call > > block_input. Do we have any facilities to find out where this > > happens? Stefan? anyone? > > Add parameters to block_input and unblock_input to remember where they > were called from. I think that such an investment should pay off in the > long run. Would you like to do that, please? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 15:33:03 2013 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 19:33:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53762 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1eJ-0007ig-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:03 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:59121) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1eH-0007hs-Ae for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:01 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LoKed-1UMYSU0fOb-00gDaI for <14631@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:32:55 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2013 19:32:54 -0000 Received: from 62-47-43-88.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.43.88]) [62.47.43.88] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2013 21:32:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18nf9NFfasny/wXrJizm3ujs1WHdZ/5hNCzlJWsMk 2bbxl76kqergXg Message-ID: <51C0B5DB.8000607@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:32:43 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14631: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <83wqpssnme.fsf@gnu.org> <51C00A49.80200@gmx.at> <83ehbzs8zk.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ehbzs8zk.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > Would you like to do that, please? I'll look into it when I'm done with pixelwise resizing. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 22 03:58:53 2013 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2013 07:58:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UqIii-00042C-Gh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:58:52 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:64278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UqIid-00041a-Op; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:58:48 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOS00800BD7H900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:58:41 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOS008ANBHT9Z70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:58:41 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:58:55 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14677: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Dani Moncayo Message-id: <837ghmmv9c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6ea1df8f-ecc2-401b-b0bb-ca2583a3d8d9@default> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: 14677@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 14677 14679 14631 thanks > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: 14677@debbugs.gnu.org > > Backtrace translation: > > c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7741 > c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7773 > c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7121 > c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7132 Both this and #14679 are duplicates of #14631. It's the problem with mismatch of block_input and unblock_input. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 27 11:06:56 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2014 16:06:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W7oi7-0003sz-AQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:06:55 -0500 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:33834) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W7oi4-0003so-FG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:06:53 -0500 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0200300I0I5R00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:06:51 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N02003KEI3E0O40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:06:51 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:06:44 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#16563: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-id: <83eh3t9zor.fsf@gnu.org> References: <980eab8e-2398-46f3-bd09-e08a3525a56b@default> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) merge 16563 14631 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 29 06:12:03 2015 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2015 11:12:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsCB-0008LI-Bb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:12:03 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39133) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsC9-0008Ke-Ch; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:12:01 -0500 Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsBm-0002M2-Sd; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:39 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14677: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <6ea1df8f-ecc2-401b-b0bb-ca2583a3d8d9@default> <837ghmmv9c.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <837ghmmv9c.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:58:55 +0300") Message-ID: <87oad9jyqe.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MailScanner-ID: 1aDsBm-0002M2-Sd X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451992300.13999@KcGwLEDWa1/p9velurhIPw X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, 14677@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, Dani Moncayo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > merge 14677 14679 14631 > thanks > >> From: Dani Moncayo >> Cc: 14677@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Backtrace translation: >> >> c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7741 >> c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/w32fns.c:7773 >> c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7121 >> c:/msys/home/dani/emacs/trunk/src/keyboard.c:7132 > > Both this and #14679 are duplicates of #14631. It's the problem with > mismatch of block_input and unblock_input. I'm guessing there's nothing further to be done in this report (from two years ago), so I'm closing it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 29 06:12:07 2015 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2015 11:12:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsCF-0008Ll-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:12:07 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:39142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsCC-0008LV-L6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:12:04 -0500 Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aDsBr-0002MG-8d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:43 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:42 +0100 Message-Id: <87mvstjyq9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14631 X-MailScanner-ID: 1aDsBr-0002MG-8d X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451992303.72862@9BHV0qUlax4qBLvMdVsIoA X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) close 14631 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Dec 29 12:42:34 2015 Received: (at 14631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2015 17:42:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDyI5-00027i-R6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:42:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34717) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDyI3-00027P-Ja for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:42:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDyHx-000540-OV for 14631@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:42:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDyHb-0004uv-Lq; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:42:03 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4584 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aDyHa-0000qD-RC; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:42:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:42:56 +0200 Message-Id: <837fjxducf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87oad9jyqe.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:37 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#14677: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt References: <6ea1df8f-ecc2-401b-b0bb-ca2583a3d8d9@default> <837ghmmv9c.fsf@gnu.org> <87oad9jyqe.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14631 Cc: 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, 14677@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Dani Moncayo , 14631@debbugs.gnu.org, 14677@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:11:37 +0100 > > > Both this and #14679 are duplicates of #14631. It's the problem with > > mismatch of block_input and unblock_input. > > I'm guessing there's nothing further to be done in this report (from two > years ago), so I'm closing it. Right, thanks. From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:14:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator