GNU bug report logs - #14570
[c.] Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
To: 14570 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#14570: [c.] Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:23:45 +0800

[Message part 1 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "c." <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com>
To: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: "help\@octave.org List" <help <at> octave.org>
Subject: Re: New development for emacs's octave-mode
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:15:24 +0200

On 5 Jun 2013, at 20:05, c. <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 5 Jun 2013, at 19:22, c. <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 5 Jun 2013, at 18:17, Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> These were added a few weeks ago.
>> oh, then maybe my octave.el is outdated, I'll get a new version.
>> Thanks!
>> c.
> 
> Indeed, with the latest version classdef keywords are highlighted.
> c.


Hi,

I just noticed a strange behaviour editing a function file with a default parameter:

I have a function with the following signature:

   function disordine_quad_fast_neumann (csvfilename, nprocs=1, range = [])


in a file with the same name whenever I try to save the file I am asked 'which name to use':

  a) use function name '1'
  b) use file name 'disordine_quad_fast_neumann'
  q) Don't fix

It seems the default parameter value is being mistaken for the function name.

c.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.