GNU bug report logs - #14569
24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi <at> alice.it>
To: Cygwin <cygwin <at> cygwin.com>
Cc: 14569 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu
Subject: bug#14569: 24.3.50; bootstrap fails on Cygwin
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:54:21 +0200

Christopher Faylor wrote
>>On 06/14/2013 11:03 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>You pointed to an archived mail messages which implies that was fixed
>>>more than a year ago.  What makes you think it is still a problem?
>>
>>The message I pointed to
>><http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00472.html> says this:
>>
>>>Testcase signal/kill: Signals may or may not reach the correct thread
>>>with 1.7.12-1 and newer.
>>
>>Confirmed.  I think the reason is that we only have a single event to
>>signal that a POSIX signal arrived instead of a per-thread event, but
>>I'm not sure.  This is cgf's domain so I leave it at that for now.
>>
>>I interpreted this to mean "the existence of the bug is confirmed,
>>here's why the bug occurs, and I'll let cgf deal with it".  I didn't
>>see any followup message where cgf (is that you?) dealt with it.  My
>>apologies if I misinterpreted the email.
>
> Oops.  I didn't read Corinna's message as thoroughly as I should have.
> Sorry.
>
> That particular issue was supposed to have been fixed in Cygwin 1.7.17,
> released in October 2012.

Out of curiosity, I tried the test cases I found in that thread, more 
precisely here:

  http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-05/msg00434.html


and the results are:

$ gcc otto_test1.c -o otto_test1
$ ./otto_test1
Testing deferred pthread_cancel()

Thread 0 starting (0x200102c0)
Thread 1 starting (0x20010360)
Thread 2 starting (0x20010400)

Cancelling thread 2 (0x20010400)
Thread 2 exiting (0x20010400)
Cancelling thread 1 (0x20010360)
Thread 1 exiting (0x20010360)
Cancelling thread 0 (0x200102c0)
Thread 0 exiting (0x200102c0)

Thread 0 is gone (0x200102c0)
Thread 1 is gone (0x20010360)
Thread 2 is gone (0x20010400)

$ gcc otto_test2.c -o otto_test2
$ ./otto_test2
Testing asynchronous pthread_cancel()

Thread 0 starting (0x200102c0)
Changing canceltype from 0 to 1
Thread 1 starting (0x20010360)
Changing canceltype from 0 to 1
Thread 2 starting (0x20010400)
Changing canceltype from 0 to 1

Cancelling thread 2 (0x20010400)
Thread 2 exiting (0x20010400)
Cancelling thread 1 (0x20010360)
Thread 1 exiting (0x20010360)
Cancelling thread 0 (0x200102c0)
Thread 0 exiting (0x200102c0)

Thread 0 is gone (0x200102c0)
Thread 1 is gone (0x20010360)
Thread 2 is gone (0x20010400)

$ gcc otto_test3.c -o otto_test3
$ ./otto_test3
Testing pthread_kill()

Thread 0 starting (0x200102c0)
Thread 1 starting (0x20010360)
Thread 2 starting (0x20010400)

Sending SIGUSR1 to thread 2 (0x20010400)
Thread 2 executes signal handler (0x20010400)
Thread 2 encountered an error: Interrupted system call (0x20010400)
Sending SIGUSR1 to thread 1 (0x20010360)
Thread 1 executes signal handler (0x20010360)
Thread 1 encountered an error: Interrupted system call (0x20010360)
Sending SIGUSR1 to thread 0 (0x200102c0)
Thread 0 executes signal handler (0x200102c0)
Thread 0 encountered an error: Interrupted system call (0x200102c0)

Are the errors in the last test case to be expected under the 20130612 
snapshot (CYGWIN_NT-5.1, 1.7.21s 20130612 21:06:59, i686 Cygwin)?


Ciao,
Angelo.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.