GNU bug report logs - #14556
suggestion for 'ls' coreutil, comma'd filesizes in -l output

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:24:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Done: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
Cc: smujohnson <at> gmail.com, 14556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#14556: suggestion for 'ls' coreutil, comma'd filesizes in -l output
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:51:21 +0100
On 06/04/2013 09:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding the list back in the loop; also adding bug-coreutils to get a
> bug number assigned for 2 doc bugs, and slightly reformatting to avoid
> excessive top-posting]
> 
> On 06/04/2013 01:44 PM, smu johnson wrote:
>> I did reply on purpose to you, but only because I wasn't sure about some of
>> the text you wrote in your original reply, and because I didn't realize it
>> was a list until now.
>>
>> I got the first email address from http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/,
>> where it says, "Send general questions or suggestions to: coreutils <at> gnu.org".
>> It didn't warn me that sending an email is the equivalent to sending to a
>> mailing list.  So I mistakenly thought you were in charge of answering
>> emails.  My bad, sorry about that.
> 
> My take on this is that you have discovered a doc bug, in that our web
> page is not making it clear that our bug reporting address is a publicly
> archived mailing list (although this setup is typical for most open
> source projects, it is not universal; and it takes an outsider's
> perspective like yours to make us realize that we have unstated
> assumptions that ended up surprising you).  We could probably add a
> sentence or two to the web page that makes it clear that your post goes
> to a list, that we are unable to scrub anything you post (so even though
> we do our best to munge things to minimize the effects, we cannot
> guarantee that spammers will not obtain your address from your post),
> and that list policy is to reply-to-all to keep you in the loop without
> forcing you to subscribe to the list.

Hopefully the current text is now obvious.

thanks,
Pádraig.




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 354 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.