From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:36:26 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#14547 <14547@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#14547 <14547@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap Reply-To: bug#14547 <14547@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:36:26 +0000 retitle 14547 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap reassign 14547 emacs submitter 14547 E Sabof severity 14547 minor tag 14547 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 09:23:15 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 13:23:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUjD-0005xv-7W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:23:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUj5-0005xC-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:23:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUh8-00062Z-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:21:10 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUh8-00062V-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:21:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUh6-0001a7-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:21:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUh3-000600-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:21:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]:63174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UjUh3-0005zr-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:21:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id bv4so1806229qab.12 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Vx6QzGrb8d9Q9R9Cq167IYKDs3Hi0HBdLGLEd10jtB0=; b=TvBKSEhsOIInxPgg2eiVhNZpg0h9NmAClZKcSoZlm5dcmB9JEsK1qPBoNTv7bUjWE6 OZa+nMBNOixqA/242dILOYdIYuPoLRB6ZPQZOKRD/vFn0RB/YUieFEncy9JGNVaeG+Bo vgwkOXaTsyOy/CAw4jGBDLKk0zJWPclh1AxlW/a/rwuyNgL2BKLu6N5XkGaiyOzuV7qT o9j91856llL93L7g8ENahiExLwEpWiR1dJt3NgV4FGVvPym3rLe3+EBkqs8YaLIN7Vyn 9j41Feg75RQMZ5vS2zxecXPU6StbZJi3tq4Bs1s81wULoDF2UFQtO0sA+gqbL1o+53Ak t+yA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.79.138 with SMTP id p10mr18995833qak.13.1370265660530; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.18.162 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 06:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap From: E Sabof To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0de88f1a3c304de3fd567 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) --047d7bf0de88f1a3c304de3fd567 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: (insert (propertize "\n" 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) 'face '(:underline t)) "\n") (toggle-word-wrap 1) If one makes the line one pixel shorter, it will work fine. (insert (propertize "\n" 'display `(space :align-to (- right (1))) 'face '(:underline t)) "\n") (toggle-word-wrap 1) Evgeni --047d7bf0de88f1a3c304de3fd567 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the li= ne will break:

(insert (propertize
=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"\n"
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'dis= play `(space :align-to (- right))
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'face '(:underline t))
=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "\n")

(toggle-word= -wrap 1)

If one makes the line one pixel shorter, = it will work fine.

(insert (propertize
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0"\n"
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'display `(space :al= ign-to (- right (1)))
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'face '(:und= erline t))
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "\n")

(toggle-word-wrap 1)

Evgeni
--047d7bf0de88f1a3c304de3fd567-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 12:09:14 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 16:09:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjXJp-0008Nk-78 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:09:13 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjXJl-0008Mm-WC for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:09:11 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MNT00500RDM1W00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:07:10 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MNT00472RFYK5A0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:07:10 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:07:06 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: E Sabof Message-id: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> References: X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:00 +0100 > From: E Sabof > > If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: > > (insert (propertize > "\n" > 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) > 'face '(:underline t)) > "\n") > > (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > If one makes the line one pixel shorter, it will work fine. > > (insert (propertize > "\n" > 'display `(space :align-to (- right (1))) > 'face '(:underline t)) > "\n") > > (toggle-word-wrap 1) Isn't that the same issue as discussed in this old bug: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9530 IOW, you cannot align-to the right margin, because this leaves no place to display anything. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 12:29:43 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 16:29:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjXde-0000se-Pe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:29:43 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:62130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjXda-0000sB-UT for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:29:40 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.34]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LtC3J-1UHbHc1icF-012mDQ for <14547@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:27:39 +0200 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jun 2013 16:27:38 -0000 Received: from i59F57E93.versanet.de (EHLO rosalinde.fritz.box) [89.245.126.147] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 03 Jun 2013 18:27:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18oQxd6oU8o92dkF7cCLcTV8DxIPedWmkCLIi1r07 XX7/Yg21KuLpy1 From: Stephen Berman To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:27:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:07:06 +0300") Message-ID: <87y5aryxaf.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org, E Sabof X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:07:06 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:00 +0100 >> From: E Sabof >> >> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: >> >> (insert (propertize >> "\n" >> 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) >> 'face '(:underline t)) >> "\n") >> >> (toggle-word-wrap 1) >> >> If one makes the line one pixel shorter, it will work fine. >> >> (insert (propertize >> "\n" >> 'display `(space :align-to (- right (1))) >> 'face '(:underline t)) >> "\n") >> >> (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > Isn't that the same issue as discussed in this old bug: > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9530 > > IOW, you cannot align-to the right margin, because this leaves no > place to display anything. I think it's a manifestation of bug#2749, because I see no line break with this recipe in Emacs built with my patch enabling overflow-newline-into-fringe in visual-line-mode. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 13:00:50 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 17:00:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjY7l-0002Lq-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:00:50 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:46987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjY7i-0002La-Se for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:00:49 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id eg20so320834lab.5 for <14547@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:58:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3GyRSU3PoVsElMr9IjYpJfsWvTDjECFZBsn/SwgZCZM=; b=v50+7CclDHwIzstBIDBRXkinBRLMobMiO/J3bCB3l6uPHGvox+bK27sFVIVaJQ2roV vm9ltG6/xqsYtEvHeSQhhfgWZSozK1KULigE+t6o69bP30e20zrNrhumhRw1aYTrUQ6R 2KKp2gsCAk95jVEpXdJSd8YSHbaqqkm0AXUiV9AFE40pv3D6q9Uo3omr7YPH1LfjsoSW Vjt4V3anRCMFsZDlPKdTx2BKCRX/icVLu+h8G27EAQXbOAklJR+Rx2CbJpO9WjsxkecP l9e4sTMh/OonTKUJIALwHLMgmvj/k5QSejX/XeZyZiCjW1AwT1rrQXfQfjGkBCXogNxG IOXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.103 with SMTP id i7mr11184058laa.39.1370278727605; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.69.229 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:58:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:58:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap From: E Sabof To: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c27bbecd661804de42e076 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --001a11c27bbecd661804de42e076 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: E Sabof Date: Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap To: Eli Zaretskii I don't think there is any ambiguity in this case - it DTRT unless both word-wrap and visual-line are on. Evgeni On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:00 +0100 > > From: E Sabof > > > > If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: > > > > (insert (propertize > > "\n" > > 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) > > 'face '(:underline t)) > > "\n") > > > > (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > > > If one makes the line one pixel shorter, it will work fine. > > > > (insert (propertize > > "\n" > > 'display `(space :align-to (- right (1))) > > 'face '(:underline t)) > > "\n") > > > > (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > Isn't that the same issue as discussed in this old bug: > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9530 > > IOW, you cannot align-to the right margin, because this leaves no > place to display anything. > --001a11c27bbecd661804de42e076 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


---------- Forwarded me= ssage ----------
From: E Sabof <esabof@gmail.com>=
Date: Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-b= reak with pixel specification and word-wrap
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>


I don't think there is any ambiguity in this case - it DTRT unless both= word-wrap and visual-line are on.

Evgeni

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrot= e:
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:00 +0100
> From: E Sabof <esabof@gmail.com>
>
> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will brea= k:
>
> (insert (propertize
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"\n"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'display `(space :align-to (- right))
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'face '(:underline t))
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "\n")
>
> (toggle-word-wrap 1)
>
> If one makes the line one pixel shorter, it will work fine.
>
> (insert (propertize
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"\n"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'display `(space :align-to (- right (1))) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'face '(:underline t))
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "\n")
>
> (toggle-word-wrap 1)

Isn't that the same issue as discussed in this old bug:

=A0 http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D9530

IOW, you cannot align-to the right margin, because this leaves no
place to display anything.


--001a11c27bbecd661804de42e076-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 13:12:38 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 17:12:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYJC-0002pG-C6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:12:38 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:62594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYJA-0002ov-6h for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:12:37 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MNT00000U8OTX00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:10:36 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MNT000RIUDOKY90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:10:36 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:10:32 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: E Sabof Message-id: <831u8jxgqf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) [Why personal email?] > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:57:23 +0100 > From: E Sabof > > I don't think there is any ambiguity in this case - it DTRT unless both > word-wrap and visual-line are on. Sorry, I don't understand. What is TRT, and what do you expect it to do when visual-line-mode and word-wrap are on? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 13:21:52 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 17:21:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49270 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYS8-0003Bl-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:21:52 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:56575) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYS5-0003BX-KE for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:21:50 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t10so4091888lbi.32 for <14547@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hRDK3AmlWwHGEUapIhZ7bdLAJPpLOyGHjC4INTYlEME=; b=JFom3E53lgXLwbodLg5NnYweVgHQMWdWTBmEnu5MHoXBTkUWVaS6mCREhKtFhWpcpc BPv9qO+udqnQScGw9YkwCbRaxpLs1z9MN4j9gjyeEQSgQhRm4cnFzULelLbAjvxdcJ5I xN2aWseqH4mrBvCJO+zTLBBqmIzUjC9S1q+0/uvoZsijPXU28C4yTmE99IAjl/m1yGb+ ttGUsvb56/WQ93hpPabWlbqBTV5krpGlgVPakdSPPiiUdFmBAwp/ogx/c7ZeEmFdpMA7 YHHAHbx1y6rhb5HzPIN9OfJ5aJdb4JpmVaCt2KIb6w7INpdadCYKwWJb5iHahRnrYJWc 5HYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.126.9 with SMTP id mu9mr11073269lbb.99.1370279990517; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.69.229 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:19:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <831u8jxgqf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> <831u8jxgqf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:19:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap From: E Sabof To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3786413e8da04de432c93 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) --001a11c3786413e8da04de432c93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > [Why personal email?] > Pressed the wrong button. I've forwarded the message to the bug tracker. > > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:57:23 +0100 > > From: E Sabof > > > > I don't think there is any ambiguity in this case - it DTRT unless both > > word-wrap and visual-line are on. > > Sorry, I don't understand. What is TRT, and what do you expect it to > do when visual-line-mode and word-wrap are on? > The line shouldn't break. If the cursor is placed immediately after the horizontal line, it should be displayed on the fringe. Evgeni --001a11c3786413e8da04de432c93 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
[Why personal email?]

Pressed the wrong= button. I've forwarded the message to the bug tracker.=A0
= =A0
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:57:23 +0100
> From: E Sabof <esabof@gmail.com= >
>
> I don't think there is any ambiguity in this cas= e - it DTRT unless both
> word-wrap and visual-line are on.

Sorry, I don't understand. =A0What is TRT, and what do you expect= it to
do when visual-line-mode and word-wrap are on?

The line shouldn't break. If the cursor is placed immediately a= fter the horizontal line, it should be displayed on the fringe.

Evgeni
--001a11c3786413e8da04de432c93-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 13:53:43 2013 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYwx-0004HF-8i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:53:43 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:34875) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjYwv-0004Gp-1g for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:53:41 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MNT00300W8JSY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:51:41 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MNT0027MWA4ETS0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:51:40 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:51:36 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: E Sabof Message-id: <83wqqbw09j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> <831u8jxgqf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:19:50 +0100 > From: E Sabof > Cc: 14547@debbugs.gnu.org > > The line shouldn't break. If the cursor is placed immediately after the > horizontal line, it should be displayed on the fringe. That's a missing feature at best: cursor on the fringe is not supported when word-wrap is in effect. See bug #2479. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 30 16:43:26 2022 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 21:43:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHyo-0005l7-4m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:43:26 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHym-0005kp-4l for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:43:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nZbuQZg6CiadSUrr6ftlZ5YpLWVSXMHtI9qXtj4Z8XQ=; b=hpE+NGDgTy+CmgMo1LImFk4aGI DNzkfaEDjI3Pmh6Dk2vKbf8+dGyU4Q3eClQ4wHLEYyoKNW7MSHnuvRwLJRsZkBZAHmD30+ueHGAuE 5JUpgPBqGLEPexn971DmFANWdGkxri6U5u1ljkAYnvrsuiunu8Oqp8jJS0B3CNZYrFKY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHyd-0002gZ-5w; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:17 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stephen Berman Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5aryxaf.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> X-Now-Playing: Ida's _Lovers Prayers_: "Kora" Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y5aryxaf.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> (Stephen Berman's message of "Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:27:36 +0200") Message-ID: <877dag7vd9.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: >>> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: >>> >>> (insert (propertize >>> "\n" >>> 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) >>> 'face '(:underline t)) >>> "\n") >>> >>> [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 14547@debbugs.gnu.org, E Sabof X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stephen Berman writes: >>> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: >>> >>> (insert (propertize >>> "\n" >>> 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) >>> 'face '(:underline t)) >>> "\n") >>> >>> (toggle-word-wrap 1) [...] > I think it's a manifestation of bug#2749, because I see no line break > with this recipe in Emacs built with my patch enabling > overflow-newline-into-fringe in visual-line-mode. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved at the time.) bug#2749 was fixed a few weeks later, so does that mean that the problem discussed here also was fixed? (I must admit I didn't understand what the reproducing code here is supposed to demonstrate.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jan 30 16:43:31 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2022 21:43:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHyt-0005lR-BT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:43:31 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHyr-0005ky-D0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:43:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gC8oYFhY0YwTlT4DUTPU2SWxUsVgZRGxA60Fev5hymA=; b=TTMOFOZOHc7E+RoAHMGl0YjxHT QTklk10zl5D32eMsPvICtK6wpfh2/1ur1cZMZG8r1kS523WOCWhIuhLsHL8y6plqZWoS02CUniQwf dwpdTWxjTA/km+AeFOBEetuMsCJL5N6sFjFYd4cXcdP6pk+P0SwKly3EZ6PF30+0XtPM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nEHyj-0002gi-FE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:20 +0100 Message-Id: <875yq07vd3.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14547 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 14547 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 14547 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 31 04:06:24 2022 Received: (at 14547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2022 09:06:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nESdk-0001vJ-7a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:06:24 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:36053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nESdi-0001v3-8d for 14547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:06:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1643619975; bh=DNeb5NjuropGPiW9BlINNnohtINaj1bS4NUXjRStXxw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TF6Lm/veXtBTbmCSlNcjyiHa9laUq6Tu2j/9UYC4VGIgW5cXblG8J8i1idfYJdz9Q 1lGrgdIR14nCgnZXaFvI/jDiczx/ZCA/9LHYKJBOHfLdLh7y6HQ7CiGENWwFVjp9f3 pZIMVStSfkdQdpC0AC0PDN1px9+sa3aCiOmWS5Qw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobelfs2 ([89.246.38.20]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M7sHo-1n9Wh322s6-00508m; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:06:15 +0100 From: Stephen Berman To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5aryxaf.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <877dag7vd9.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:06:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877dag7vd9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:14 +0100") Message-ID: <877dagz33t.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:usQcYKb4tKmiNmv1gtxu+ou/wL0+/fMSRhA6r427gRzjjr37EMU mLFsimH43caojJL0f+sNuhIOiRh1gb9hr6GZbuWiRl4trEtqHv/sJXQg0fB0Z0x9xkjXVzC A23nwbKukvbacOjjPeta8M6/qQGD3VzcKQmhHTo4cya1J7VCAK5aR7ujxT/dQNip1S/n3Lr uqB2ux73YgzD0dNzCWWbA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Rn+idrPJgPs=:/sMr2KG2vqLXeTgPiwkMRM PflMN3TwLAlEdqv+mwjv8aCw5JhplAXRDLIzs3MQnI3Myxn7xwnFNuONlVoTieYsxP3F1yoN9 mzNdf4mqltlbmeQh4oCElqac50cel1nrKxTNqV8U90YEOPwG9cvim8Gi2IPbT4KA5uLpORfM5 H5yfyoA7dlPIvcc6Bp2FAd5mE0G0ocLzRCE4XR9HQSsGiSKynq7zcXbQgy4gxSW8l7NdWiFyl /8q94k1nlKBY8De5PMuUhdXpI0k2eH2cQyHP14dIc8zt8s6Oceortl7dnrAHIZzCQjK+WACSy 3Ywz9/JDCDGhcWsY1YwEc3nMVL9RCncpQJ5VxSGaK9Y8SQ+RSXThwmNT/md5RvWtfB0uQRL5b No9SbWZjSq0dWbrK8kIE08Rsgg8A6ozNkFdqjBUlH6O7dKP9WSOAqMBAONu8CnfjKMKzvn1Wy vA1u8iw+R4ntt3e/1rT/PejMYJpSBrcdvPayI6CF2wdMdNWGxHNx9bCXugOLtOPrkvmJxfiqT G7rkUAIA3Jkn59K57CA5K39k8B3Yhci7dIEaYXDlUu63xJqyFQuIT5FpbCXVeldtL+Jsg2Wrb 52PLzMgdhKEHenEteFmvqKn6qfeFbBXdCvaSjZ3UL/YeqTF5hVIZjLzoWDTorjjLJT3XiysKt K9vM9mzpp42jEHNSl1YzHs725z+wVe8dDqqQe+jRZ1/uiUNUhwOykTwWzfaJtmxdwNA93vhaY r+MQGyRB4O4e0XsoPnFFgtIRcZqipZapEzM0CzTMq2f2ZelI+ibZP5ZWW6sjiC+l7IzyaMOD9 aovamzQrRlKEeQCmtpFISm36QEoqWEfLxUuXt9XFW90JQD1Gxq9voJcsu4mWJVjTKpsHYpHJJ iEyChLsiREJYUoy+EiRwzYR2jdFsxkugafD3uY1fEdMtz1aLafiY330mRAZPklzIKlnuOXFeB fVzwu+74/l2J56LoHxWnzrfz3UPqLU/jtGxZNCr93zhRQNWbA3qlnG2EJ6Fd0yQAOxrMsfaiN nj/NGH9m9HvHdT1JyxHgxEBd5a/YJq22aLg21ERezB8cgSooc0ZkUGq7+lpGXW1Ju7+sZZeXL PbcTEZ+QfIdkFw= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 14547@debbugs.gnu.org, E Sabof X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:14 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrot= e: > Stephen Berman writes: > >>>> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will bre= ak: >>>> >>>> (insert (propertize >>>> "\n" >>>> 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) >>>> 'face '(:underline t)) >>>> "\n") >>>> >>>> (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > [...] > >> I think it's a manifestation of bug#2749, because I see no line break >> with this recipe in Emacs built with my patch enabling >> overflow-newline-into-fringe in visual-line-mode. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > at the time.) > > bug#2749 was fixed a few weeks later, so does that mean that the problem > discussed here also was fixed? I think so. > (I must admit I didn't understand what > the reproducing code here is supposed to demonstrate.) Based on the descriptions and discussion in bug#2749, I think the above code used to display an empty line between the parts of the line separated by the display property. It doesn't now, presumably since the fix for bug#2749, which allows the newline to be in the fringe. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 31 07:48:14 2022 Received: (at 14547-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2022 12:48:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEW6Q-0001w3-Es for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:48:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEW6O-0001vp-TT for 14547-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:48:13 -0500 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=43554 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEW61-00043R-CS; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:48:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=k9CggPk3Nuf+lO4FvXhekmkYSYifwBEki5ZJdjAk0yE=; b=PJIedBJMoCyl Rnu7TdmADUUetAEvAiX7BzE2PpogBogd2Y2zfpKwxa0fetLmr5ST/+EWS+ANlCxB4vzPOkUWxAHi4 KTKtRqoOn32A8VKLZDdFB1Tepijm/MFdV8GgexCXtXqJPJy1zLswFYMpA/Cx+yx7cyu30v6WGcxPy lr0A4uqFn7PbdSxlcVByNV7jwMPJ7TBmarKN1fJt0kFEntrZL3wVVBky7gI6NSB5Izl1b7eME70my +S1FRJaUptRkSFTIgDbqUKuNRJY79pz6iJR30mTDQ72xkaac46m14jjaLSg8sj6BnUEqR7p2CbpiH fPCIFwGOUZCqWsC8YKii0Q==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2914 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nEW5k-0000xu-Ec; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 07:47:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 14:47:29 +0200 Message-Id: <83o83s842m.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stephen Berman In-Reply-To: <877dagz33t.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:06:14 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#14547: 24.3.1; line-break with pixel specification and word-wrap References: <83d2s3xjo5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5aryxaf.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <877dag7vd9.fsf@gnus.org> <877dagz33t.fsf@gmx.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14547-done Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 14547-done@debbugs.gnu.org, esabof@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 14547@debbugs.gnu.org, E Sabof > > Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:06:14 +0100 > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:43:14 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > > Stephen Berman writes: > > > >>>> If one executes the following in a graphical frame, the line will break: > >>>> > >>>> (insert (propertize > >>>> "\n" > >>>> 'display `(space :align-to (- right)) > >>>> 'face '(:underline t)) > >>>> "\n") > >>>> > >>>> (toggle-word-wrap 1) > > > > [...] > > > >> I think it's a manifestation of bug#2749, because I see no line break > >> with this recipe in Emacs built with my patch enabling > >> overflow-newline-into-fringe in visual-line-mode. > > > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved > > at the time.) > > > > bug#2749 was fixed a few weeks later, so does that mean that the problem > > discussed here also was fixed? > > I think so. > > > (I must admit I didn't understand what > > the reproducing code here is supposed to demonstrate.) > > Based on the descriptions and discussion in bug#2749, I think the above > code used to display an empty line between the parts of the line > separated by the display property. It doesn't now, presumably since the > fix for bug#2749, which allows the newline to be in the fringe. Yes, and I'm therefore closing this bug. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:36:26 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator