From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:13:22 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#14537 <14537@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#14537 <14537@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: defect in guile with syntax transformation Reply-To: bug#14537 <14537@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:13:22 +0000 retitle 14537 defect in guile with syntax transformation reassign 14537 guile submitter 14537 "Dr. M. Luedde" severity 14537 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 02 14:19:05 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2013 18:19:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjCrw-0003bA-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:19:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55413) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3T7-0005eZ-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:16:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3RI-0004df-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:14:58 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_HK_NAME_FM_DR autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3RI-0004db-Io for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:14:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3RF-0007pm-KL for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:14:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3RC-0004dB-NK for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:14:53 -0400 Received: from nm16-vm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.88]:35710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uj3RC-0004cv-Ag for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 04:14:50 -0400 Received: from [77.238.189.230] by nm16.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2013 08:14:48 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.122] by tm11.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2013 08:14:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2013 08:14:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 723214.77137.bm@omp1031.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 67499 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2013 08:14:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1370160888; bh=A4Xy6LyPeX1BzmOo62DMppo9OzJvogHyagXRbkLtki0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b7XjcR2K7lKDxfbr3HUpdevhWX9BaGE87J76sLQgZTALc3/WSf6mu3KU+B7Ghk/iWldo/kCRnxFVS9aqwmUFz6guYk41f9hOATR31EuKsRRSM0xkhCnAEaNWxNGIcQmsBBEOtfGSsC2EF31AqAv9O0IybsV/DVs5mxd2VmqLvX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Kh97RyfODcx4pvEALJAKPCYX3TjM/SpNhB8YCFn0YhAsv/fObgfgo5hpN0/Vdv21ylqaYfJ3NfpNIct5jT9VCi9NGoNtt0Y+j7eSZOEH4KD50C0ANI0w1NFQ2pkvxK2j4mwtLh+Tqvp5/t/p/K9OeVicCiU1PlYrUogNrxxTWls=; X-YMail-OSG: cBQ74EMVM1kZrXAi7LoZ_3DQQSbXTpwb5z6rouSD5o6Oxa6 _vL97qEWAgi8Voz8_85LQW__lUhXMl8MEl5peyeAyeKjHo.Sy0yzKwrwIGkd diOG9y70E4vFNfFl9l6IEAtN_Kkx.bqzUI5FD4A.BF030iXvxQ5jfd2Vn7zl v6uYmrbm0x_Rn2zZhthH9sGVkYDMPqcfOh0ZY5a5aqQnRs6fTfDMF73gv3xI awZY3tzfIkD4HryoHcJ7DGMwbM3069euofOzcMQD8WvOciZx4n5e13Npu9yx XhTVGXAq8p9FxpwVUV8WRAWscgokJDQd7gtbxymxlmYimUKJ.j8ta_Nfetnk 5CIDO3_p3Gl.b2CNH3OwvfI_mOUK_cN_nhIyCe01TgH0x23TWoOSEtlu7TNG u1bqbpStMzC2oyuHHPqKeD.bTt3F3jiPf2X9HucQ1eR9uahY96Q5g3XDheXG ALXyx1JunFZNBjMkv8Y3WjJAHUwTAIWOgm0eqmARyCE5H8Da3Ma7D9OsRRxL mhxJn.NoG0ADobWI- Received: from [109.193.75.192] by web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 09:14:48 BST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, OzsgSSB0aGluayB0aGUgYmVsb3cgY29kZSBleGhpYml0cyBhIGRlZmVjdCB3aXRoIGd1aWxlIDEuOC43Lg0KOzsNCjs7IFRoZSBgZGVmcmVjJyBzeW50YXggdHJhbnNmb3JtZXIgKGRlZmluZWQgYmVsb3cpIGRvZXMgbm90IGJlaGF2ZQ0KOzsgY29ycmVjdGx5IHdpdGhpbiBhbiBpbWJlZGRpbmcgYGxldCcgZXhwcmVzc2lvbi4NCjs7DQo7OyBUaGUgc3lzdGVtIGlzIENZR1dJTl9OVC02LjEtV09XNjQgV0RGTjAwMzA1ODU5QSAxLjcuMTgoMC4yNjMvNS8zKQ0KOzsgMjAxMy0wNC0xOSAxMDozOSBpNjg2IEN5Z3cBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.1.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.145.547 Message-ID: <1370160888.67419.YahooMailClassic@web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 09:14:48 +0100 (BST) From: "Dr. M. Luedde" Subject: defect in guile with syntax transformation To: bug-guile@gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:19:02 -0400 Cc: mirko.luedde@sap.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) ;; I think the below code exhibits a defect with guile 1.8.7. ;; ;; The `defrec' syntax transformer (defined below) does not behave ;; correctly within an imbedding `let' expression. ;; ;; The system is CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 WDFN00305859A 1.7.18(0.263/5/3) ;; 2013-04-19 10:39 i686 Cygwin ;; ;; Guile runs in GNU bash, version 4.1.10(4)-release (i686-pc-cygwin) ;; enable `define-syntax' functionality (use-modules (ice-9 syncase)) ;; OK (let ( (n 99) ) (begin (define ev.OK? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #t =09=09=09 (od.OK? (- x 1))))) (define od.OK? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #f =09=09=09 (ev.OK? (- x 1)))))) (od.OK? 99)) ;; OK, evaluates to #t (define-syntax defrec ;; TYPE: syntax transformer. ;; ;; REQUIRES: (defrec . X) requires that X :=3D ((S_1 V_1) ... (S_N ;; V_N)). The S_I are mutually distinct symbols. The V_J may contain ;; references to the S_I. On evaluation of any V_J the value bound ;; to a referenced S_I must not be needed. ;; ;; RETURNS: The value of the expression (begin (define S_1 #f) ;; ... (define S_N #f) (set! S_1 V_1) ... (set! S_N V_N)). (syntax-rules () ((_ (S V) ...) (begin (define S #f) ... =09 (set! S V) ...)))) ;; OK (defrec (ev.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #t =09=09=09 (od.broken? (- x 1))))) (od.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #f =09=09=09 (ev.broken? (- x 1)))))) (od.broken? 99) ;; OK, evaluates to #t (let ( (n 99) ) (defrec (ev.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #t =09=09=09=09(od.broken? (- x 1))))) (od.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #f =09=09=09=09(ev.broken? (- x 1)))))) (od.broken? n)) ;; Produces an error message:=20 ;; In standard input: ;; 14: 0* (let* ((n 99)) (defrec (ev.broken? #) (od.broken? #)) (od.broke= n? n)) ;; standard input:14:1: In procedure memoization in expression (let* (#) (d= efrec # #) ...): ;; standard input:14:1: In file "standard input", line 14: Mixed definition= s and expressions in (defrec (ev.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #t (od.b= roken? (- x 1))))) (od.broken? (lambda (x) (if (zero? x) #f (ev.broken? (- = x 1)))))). ;; Backtrace: ;; ABORT: (syntax-error) -- Dr. M. Luedde, Rheinblick 26A, D-69226 Nussloch, Germany +49-175-2779708, Skype: MirkoLuedde From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 02 17:50:16 2013 Received: (at 14537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2013 21:50:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjGAJ-0003cH-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:50:16 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:50746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjGAH-0003c5-H6 for 14537@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:50:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDA4A7B; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 23:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Dz8uQpDXsQ0; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 23:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (208.186.216.87.static.jazztel.es [87.216.186.208]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0F539E4; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 23:48:19 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: "Dr. M. Luedde" Subject: Re: bug#14537: defect in guile with syntax transformation References: <1370160888.67419.YahooMailClassic@web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 23:48:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1370160888.67419.YahooMailClassic@web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> (M. Luedde's message of "Sun, 2 Jun 2013 09:14:48 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <87r4gkqj4s.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, Thanks for your report. "Dr. M. Luedde" skribis: [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4890] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14537 Cc: 14537@debbugs.gnu.org, mirko.luedde@sap.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Hello, Thanks for your report. "Dr. M. Luedde" skribis: > ;; I think the below code exhibits a defect with guile 1.8.7. Would it be an option for you to try this code in Guile 2.0.x? Guile 1.8.7 is very old and its support for hygienic macros (among other things) was leaving a lot to be desired. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 18:29:50 2013 Received: (at 14537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 22:29:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49482 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjdG9-00045j-Pz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:29:50 -0400 Received: from nm8-vm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.198]:24280) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjdG6-00045X-Nj for 14537@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:29:47 -0400 Received: from [77.238.189.237] by nm8.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2013 22:27:46 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.118] by tm18.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2013 22:27:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Jun 2013 22:27:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 532955.89093.bm@omp1055.mail.ir2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 22100 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jun 2013 22:27:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1370298466; bh=YdHpJNQMdd1LGxwu0WA3dyjhSJLdclY7G7jTQjcPgz4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=25UjIJKgCSI5odToSX8gOJ7BYQJnnP6dqgL1MWSgGESmmKzim6Oe6yyZGXmyz/GOHFwm28r8qnFgcZ1ZlmVw9fps8cCkCthRRlW4/QCQ6MI5cNjPuQLDmQCbLr0jS/cy6iO0bp//1EwVf/ZY4oEGUcAzFQ81Qo4+uCYJzEf04bw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gH5i0/vU0rQPfLjWfiUpN4seU+McRORPGemse8eqVcPsv4pWYUn8619HtF8fYHJYCjGhKpzjeSKJPIQqOyXQdc1CU41M1SuUiX0RaRYrtscfvGsidGqSvN/T8woGd7gaikIUw6rrQs4F9VO60h8JcbzYjQweiKH0HJLGTBDUX/o=; X-YMail-OSG: ziu.Es8VM1mDAn1qXzUyAgVXPqUMPwgpl12gqY8POD_45Hs w7uWlyJ_.p21P0e7ccxHvNk98td8aX5bQGvjULyvOzhmIcrHT0JYPYb6SLpF Y.CuhH_XGhYGpjwNuHOLXs_dAeqQLoji2DkVUofcGs4MK.HlWIieLE0GFH_Y 5QBePiRwGUKGNTUMYZyyXkzwvKZdGavXRLx1ieVdtds7f57dihoAvoIbnPvE aClO3ozhTI6JILur6LhwE0qIjxDLiaKV9YmrRG7gmdfX10cB378rdWhS_QFp UOVDC248AV8Ark_s3VXHSRs38TZdFuBmcEDSn3Q8iZdlPqX.vA0yfPiMu.e3 S5lZDVsXsDgTCzsvHKv6.pkELOvX6wSOSZs6MxFE.jY8ORI2fvwpOCEMgz9P xzVrmDJDPiHgzUiVA.wB8hb.iQ5mHZUz5iEQShLvY44JPx6R2h03B8lB3U_p pba3m1Ni2MQb5M..lwK3RfucdJEGfubfoKfq9oj_AnyFO0vSWloyCyNS9MJt WRhYYRPc_74cGuncw3.OG9AJpmEreOGiBUEenHw-- Received: from [81.253.34.64] by web172103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 23:27:46 BST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGVsbG8gTHVkbywKwqAKYWxyaWdodCwgSSBjb21waWxlZCBndWlsZSAyLjAuNiBvbiBteSBjeWd3aW4gc3lzdGVtLiAKwqAKR2l2ZW4gdGhlIGFtb3VudCBhbmQgY29udGVudCBvZiB0aGUgd2FybmluZ3MsIGl0IGNhbWUgYXMgYSBzdXJwcmlzZSB0byBtZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBjb21waWxhdGlvbiBhcHBhcmVudGx5IHdhcyBzdWNjZXNzdWwgYW5kIHRoZSByZXN1bHRpbmcgZ3VpbGUgZGlkIHByb2Nlc3MgbXkgdGVzdGNhc2Ugd2l0aG91dCB0aGUgcHJldmlvdXNseSBleGhpYml0ZWQgZXJyb3JzLgrCoApJIGNvbnMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.145.547 References: <1370160888.67419.YahooMailClassic@web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <87r4gkqj4s.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <1370298466.22067.YahooMailNeo@web172103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:27:46 +0100 (BST) From: "Dr. M. Luedde" Subject: Re: bug#14537: defect in guile with syntax transformation To: =?utf-8?B?THVkb3ZpYyDvu79Db3VydMOocw==?= In-Reply-To: <87r4gkqj4s.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14537 Cc: "14537@debbugs.gnu.org" <14537@debbugs.gnu.org>, "mirko.luedde@sap.com" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Dr. M. Luedde" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Hello Ludo,=0A=C2=A0=0Aalright, I compiled guile 2.0.6 on my cygwin system.= =0A=C2=A0=0AGiven the amount and content of the warnings, it came as a sur= prise to me that the compilation apparently was successul and the resulting= guile did process my testcase without the previously exhibited errors.=0A= =C2=A0=0AI consider this defect report closed. =0A=C2=A0=0AThanks and best,= Mirko=0A=C2=A0=0AP.S.=0A=C2=A0=0AThis "...I compiled guile 2.0.6 on my cyg= win system..." and this "... Guile 1.8.7 is very old" might give the cygwin= maintainers a hint. =0A=0A--=0ADr. M. Luedde, Rheinblick 26A, D-69226 Nuss= loch, Germany=0A+49-175-2779708, Skype: MirkoLuedde=0A=0A=0A----- Urspr=C3= =BCngliche Message -----=0A> Von: Ludovic =EF=BB=BFCourt=C3=A8s =0A> An: Dr. M. Luedde =0A> CC: 14537@debbugs.gnu= .org; mirko.luedde@sap.com=0A> Gesendet: 23:48 Sonntag, 2.Juni 2013=0A> Bet= reff: Re: bug#14537: defect in guile with syntax transformation=0A> =0A> He= llo,=0A> =0A> Thanks for your report.=0A> =0A> "Dr. M. Luedde" skribis:=0A> =0A>> ;; I think the below code exhibits a defect = with guile 1.8.7.=0A> =0A> Would it be an option for you to try this code i= n Guile 2.0.x?=0A> =0A> Guile 1.8.7 is very old and its support for hygieni= c macros (among other=0A> things) was leaving a lot to be desired.=0A> =0A>= Ludo=E2=80=99.=0A> From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 03 18:40:50 2013 Received: (at 14537-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2013 22:40:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjdQo-0004PZ-DN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:40:50 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:53879) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UjdQj-0004PM-Ue for 14537-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 18:40:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D04BB7C; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GfDpoC1Fhgpe; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pluto (208.186.216.87.static.jazztel.es [87.216.186.208]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A786CB7B; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:38:46 +0200 (CEST) From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: "Dr. M. Luedde" Subject: Re: bug#14537: defect in guile with syntax transformation References: <1370160888.67419.YahooMailClassic@web172105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <87r4gkqj4s.fsf@gnu.org> <1370298466.22067.YahooMailNeo@web172103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Prairial an 221 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:38:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1370298466.22067.YahooMailNeo@web172103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> (M. Luedde's message of "Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:27:46 +0100 (BST)") Message-ID: <87zjv6ddl7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, "Dr. M. Luedde" skribis: > alright, I compiled guile 2.0.6 on my cygwin system. > Â > Given the amount and content of the warnings, it came as a surprise to me that the compilation apparently was successul and the resulting guile did process my testcase without the previously exhibited errors. > Â > I consider this defect report closed. [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4966] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14537-done Cc: "14537@debbugs.gnu.org" <14537-done@debbugs.gnu.org>, "mirko.luedde@sap.com" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) Hello, "Dr. M. Luedde" skribis: > alright, I compiled guile 2.0.6 on my cygwin system.=20 > =C2=A0 > Given the amount and content of the warnings, it came as a surprise to me= that the compilation apparently was successul and the resulting guile did = process my testcase without the previously exhibited errors. > =C2=A0 > I consider this defect report closed.=20 OK, thanks! I know my answer may have sounded a bit frustrating, but it=E2=80=99s been = more than two years since 2.0 was released. It=E2=80=99s really a huge step for= ward compared to Guile 1.8, and we hope people can appreciate it and find it a good incentive to upgrade. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:13:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator