Subject: bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?

From: Linda Walsh <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 12:04:16 -0700

Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 02:54 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> ... removing features that exceeded posix
> 
> As I explained to you in my previous message, no features
> were removed.  Merely the option syntax was changed.

Ah...I'm sorry, I misunderstood.  I thought I read that
it didn't apply to the long listing format.

My bad for not reading carefully enough.
Thank you for your patience...