GNU bug report logs -
#14518
abbrev edits - delay when saving
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Am 05.06.2013 19:02, schrieb Glenn Morris:
>
> What is the point of having 1000+ abbrevs?
> How can you possibly remember them?
>
>
>
>
Often beginning of words composes the abbrev, or it's stored in an other mnemonic way,
for example
("pbos" "(py-beginning-of-statement)" nil 36)
("pbosp" "(py-beginning-of-statement-p)" nil 2)
("pbs" "(py-backward-statement)" nil 2)
("pc" "(purecopy" nil 1)
("pcb" "(py-close-base" nil 1)
("pcf" "py-complete-function" nil 3)
("pci" "(py-compute-indentation)" nil 17)
("pcioo" "(py-compute-indentation orig origline closing line inside repeat)" nil 1)
("pcl" "(py-count-lines)" nil 8)
("pclo" "(< (py-count-lines) origline)" nil 1)
("pco" "(py-compute-indentation orig origline closing line inside repeat)" nil 2)
("pcoo" "(eq (py-count-lines) origline)" nil 1)
("pcs" "(py-choose-shell)" nil 4)
("pdc" "(py-beginning-of-def-or-class)" nil 0)
Some abbrevs are never used, as the last one here - in exchange many terms have more than one abbrev.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 218 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.