GNU bug report logs -
#14502
24.3; dired-load-hook should not be customizable
Previous Next
Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:07:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 24.3
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:
> dired-x adds dired-extra-startup to dired-mode-hook…
I missed that bit.
> dired-mode-hook in my setup also has sml/set-buffer-identification added by
> smart-mode-line, so yes, it is "one of those hooks"
It seems rather unsatisfactory to have to make a decision between "one
of those hooks" and "the rest of the hooks" on a hook by hook basis...
Stefan wrote in 2013:
> So until Custom is fixed to actually properly handle customisation of
> hooks (e.g. by storing "add functions foo, bar, and baz" rather than
> "ignore current value and just set it to (foo bar baz)").
So I wondered what it would take to fix this in Customize properly. But:
(define-widget 'hook 'list
"An Emacs Lisp hook."
[...]
:set (lambda (symbol value)
(dolist (elt value)
(if (fboundp elt)
(add-hook symbol elt))))
The :set action for hooks doesn't just overwrite the value, but uses
`add-hook' the proper way?
Now I'm even more confused. Hm... Perhaps that's not the code that's
used when actually restoring hook values? Let's see.
(defun customize-set-variable (variable value &optional comment)
[...]
(funcall (or (get variable 'custom-set) #'set-default) variable value)
(get 'gnus-load-hook 'custom-set)
=> nil
So the setter is not used? Hm... Oh, it's only set if you say
(defcustom ...
:set ...)
Right. So the :set in the widget is only used interactively? *tests*
Nope, if I try to modify a hook in a Customize buffer, then it always
overwrites the hook value.
So, as usual, when trying to figure out how Customize works, it's...
just... rather obscure.
But I think one (probably controversial solution) would be to add a
`custom-set' property on all hook variables that would make it use
`add-hook' instead of just overwriting the value. That would make
Customize and add-hook coexist... but would also mean that you can't
set a hook to a specific value with Customize, which will probably break
something for somebody.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 268 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.