From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 05:24:03 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 09:24:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbozC-0007ET-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:24:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48601) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Uboz9-0007EB-I4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:24:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uboye-0005rS-Vq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:23:33 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:54554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uboye-0005rF-TU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:23:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uboyb-00046R-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:23:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UboyZ-0005lB-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:23:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:35177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UboyS-0005fI-AV; Mon, 13 May 2013 05:23:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi5so1307291wib.2 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 02:23:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=aESCGrhy64hhbK3UZqH4LrTqYNQ4CHXBmqtICXAa6ak=; b=dRf23M3Yyo+M9PhpnNOlcoVCSS6lJX1+q8//gIyAkHrJSi0I8HcHOOlqa983m102PA cS0LYxgym+93D1Y8zvpQ2vryu4MCQUW1O7UK8A8Twe9ZpUy/JlNSIPGiL4j2nnBuyr8s 7/nGLn8mMgW2CU+LvY7zRRJN0lhyCFawUtuvQVXvexfiA2rYu+OSWVn4U0ES2SRQXLRA Je392c8HTgSS63N73K+wvWAn/uw/eFqtROwGsuLI3bBke/O0Fhmpt1s9Rl37UigQUfZB SAuUy4/ewFWRQ38TYNu74X7HG+V8zMqdnf41npr4czVmIDwDrFx+RONlowLNWwxoQd/Q TVSg== X-Received: by 10.194.178.162 with SMTP id cz2mr38631458wjc.27.1368436995336; Mon, 13 May 2013 02:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sigma ([194.214.160.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm9377946wiz.0.2013.05.13.02.23.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2013 02:23:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Antoine Levitt To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-auctex@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier Subject: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:23:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) Hi, A commit of Stefan Monnier in April 23 changed the API of jit-lock-force-redisplay. First and easiest, the docstring of jit-lock-force-redisplay was not changed, and still mentions the old BUF argument. Second, this breaks function font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay in auctex, which uses the old prototype. This is present in emacs and auctex from trunk. Is the prototype change really necessary? If no, this is a bug for emacs, if yes, this is a bug for auctex. In doubt, I'm submitting the report in both. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 12:12:38 2013 Received: (at 14394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 16:12:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbvMb-00084h-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:12:38 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:33532) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbvMX-00084J-RZ for 14394@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:12:34 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMQ00B00VIVKI00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 14394@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 19:12:04 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMQ00BHVVO4KC10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 May 2013 19:12:04 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 19:11:55 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14394: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex In-reply-to: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Antoine Levitt Message-id: <83zjvy97w4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14394 Cc: bug-auctex@gnu.org, 14394@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: Antoine Levitt > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:23:07 +0200 > > A commit of Stefan Monnier in April 23 changed the API of > jit-lock-force-redisplay. First and easiest, the docstring of > jit-lock-force-redisplay was not changed, and still mentions the old BUF > argument. > > Second, this breaks function font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay in > auctex, which uses the old prototype. This is present in emacs and > auctex from trunk. The doc string fix issue aside, is there any reason why AUCTeX should call jit-lock-force-redisplay, instead of always using its expanded code, like it does for versions of Emacs that don't have that function? I mean, doesn't this incident speak volumes about the danger of using internal APIs? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 12:58:28 2013 Received: (at 14394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 16:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubw4y-0002Ql-BP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:58:28 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:52544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubw4w-0002QX-4B for 14394@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:58:27 -0400 Received: from photon (p54A52F99.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.165.47.153]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LpRkv-1TzHnm3TTp-00f758; Mon, 13 May 2013 18:57:52 +0200 From: Ralf Angeli To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] bug#14394: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex References: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> <83zjvy97w4.fsf@gnu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Antoine Levitt , bug-auctex@gnu.org, 14394@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:57:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zjvy97w4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 13 May 2013 19:11:55 +0300") Message-ID: <87hai624xc.fsf@caeruleus.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:vSiQa3jg2p+IEoOrezJMpt2UZN59zREN7s31xNVCV4E GiWV4Knx8HuouqVbOfUCbUFv5224wh8OIUoefc2s/u5lcNh+Wa U9nJ9fF9oCqw4KjjETU+TXYaFYxyacedjp/o83+8xR8JhQlyqI G3VL+XTJL/W6qFyr4j/3DzCaSy78kPuh8GHoPp+a422rkphfoe YxscIBmcEZgdntqb5uOS95dX6rXgPKIEZUgjSevLKdSTS7Yc2e fsO2RBrZhG6G4bkTmFsdu7Yp2gsaasFZ6zU06qpGWHmk0RDVbV W+x8sYSXmx3wXRUMc4k0Qeh+OzGWnoM9+Kfu6Tq+fPd5symQw= = X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14394 Cc: bug-auctex@gnu.org, 14394@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Antoine Levitt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) * Eli Zaretskii (2013-05-13) writes: >> Second, this breaks function font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay in >> auctex, which uses the old prototype. This is present in emacs and >> auctex from trunk. > > The doc string fix issue aside, is there any reason why AUCTeX should > call jit-lock-force-redisplay, instead of always using its expanded > code, like it does for versions of Emacs that don't have that > function? I guess the idea was that calling the function might be more forward-compatible than using the expanded code because this decouples the code from future changes in the underlying machinery. In this particular case this didn't work so well, but things can break with either approach. Mosè already changed the code in AUCTeX's repository to use the expanded code only, so we might stick with this for the time being and see what happens. -- Ralf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 14 11:52:53 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2013 15:52:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHX1-0007w4-Rw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47251) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWz-0007vu-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWQ-0003n3-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:56265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWQ-0003mz-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWP-0006mU-2e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWK-0003m3-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:13 -0400 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:52257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcHWK-0003lx-50; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:08 -0400 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r4EFq64l004845; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:06 -0400 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6DA7CB4161; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Antoine Levitt Subject: Re: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex Message-ID: References: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:52:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> (Antoine Levitt's message of "Mon, 13 May 2013 11:23:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4579=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4579> : streams <960523> : uri <1419969> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-auctex@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) > Second, this breaks function font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay in > auctex, which uses the old prototype. This is present in emacs and > auctex from trunk. Is the prototype change really necessary? If no, this > is a bug for emacs, if yes, this is a bug for auctex. In doubt, I'm > submitting the report in both. The answer is that font-latex should not modify font-lock-fontify-region-function and should instead use font-lock-extend-region-functions (it's OK to do what it does when running on older Emacsen which do not have font-lock-extend-region-functions, of course). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 10 16:44:37 2014 Received: (at 14394-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 21:44:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCyeb-0008S1-Ak for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:37 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54650 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCyeZ-0008Rt-6S for 14394-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:35 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCyeY-00081F-By; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:34 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 14394-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#14394: jit-lock-force-redisplay redefinition breaks jit fontification in auctex References: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spook: Vickie Weaver Ceridian 22nd SAS BROMURE Rule Psix EuroFed X-Ran: recJyD+Tp=P`bB{T1rX!KqYUQhHb!):lv@|$d|QK6Lsv`naqP7. X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:44:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87obcftero.fsf@gmail.com> (Antoine Levitt's message of "Mon, 13 May 2013 11:23:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14394-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Version: 24.4 Antoine Levitt wrote: > First and easiest, the docstring of jit-lock-force-redisplay was not > changed, and still mentions the old BUF argument. Fixed. The remainder is an AUCTeX issue, and since you said you already mailed them about it, no need to keep this Emacs bug report open. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 11:53:24 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2014 16:53:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39642 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILFz-0002ep-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:23 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49849 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILFx-0002eg-Q0 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:21 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILFw-0007b8-WC for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:20 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16879 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) forcemerge 14394 16879 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 11:53:57 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2014 16:53:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILGV-0002fx-8E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:56 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:49854 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILGU-0002fq-4W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:54 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILGT-0007fD-PZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:53:53 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16879 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) reassign 16879 emacs,auctex From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:28:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:09:01 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # Did not alter fixed versions and reopened. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 25 12:08:16 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2014 17:08:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILUN-0004JD-Lo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:08:15 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50162 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WILUL-0004J6-Km for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:08:14 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WILUL-0006ZA-Bp for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:08:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:08:13 -0500 Message-Id: Subject: control message for bug 16879 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.1) From: Glenn Morris X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) reopen 16879 reassign 16879 auctex From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:28:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator