GNU bug report logs - #14389
24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

Previous Next

Full log

Message #14 received at 14389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 14389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:16 +0300

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <14389 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, <14062 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, <13980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:07:08 -0700
> 
> > I think this part was with an earlier binary, not the one you reported
> > (because the result of using this backtrace doesn't make any sense at
> > all).
> 
> I don't think so.  After the crash I brought up the same version to report it.

But the file you sent included 2 different backtraces, so there were 2
crashes, not one.

> The previous binary I have to the one I reported about (from 5/10), is from 5/4:
> 
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
>  of 2013-05-04 on ODIEONE
> Bzr revision: 112449 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca-20130504193419-kbd4imjj1yxr5ksz
> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
> Configured using:
>  `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
>  -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib'
> 
> > My guess is it was
> > emacs-20130502-r112438-bin-i386.zip, which brings us to something very
> > similar to bug #14236, #13154, and #13980
> 
> No, I have no binary from 5/2. The one I have prior to 5/4 is from 4/26.

Well, then maybe I'm mistaken.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.