From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 11 16:02:26 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2013 20:02:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzu-0000X4-5B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzr-0000Wx-Sx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzZ-0003xP-FB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:06 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:44643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzZ-0003xK-C7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzY-0000Hd-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzX-0003wB-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:04 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:27430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UbFzX-0003w7-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 16:02:03 -0400 Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4BK21Xp007450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 20:02:02 GMT Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4BK20vp017109 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 20:02:01 GMT Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com [141.146.116.59]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4BK20WJ024717 for ; Sat, 11 May 2013 20:02:00 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 11 May 2013 13:02:00 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 13:01:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 thread-index: Ac5OgmLbBXbgbHlFTm2oIb3jozai1Q== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) Backtrace: 0x011596ED 0x0115975F 0x010E82C7 0x0101596C 0x01015146 0x0101329A 0x0100F0E2 0x01015837 0x01014F59 0x010E517E 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010141F5 0x011CA1B5 0x011CA735 0x011D3CA9 0x01016530 0x010E5C83 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010E517E 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010141F5 0x01025C4C 0x01010C39 0x0102606A 0x01014038 0x010260BE 0x0102486D 0x01010C39 0x01023814 0x01010696 0x0102377D 0x01022D88 0x010C2439 0x010C3143 0x01014D87 0x010E517E 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010E517E 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010E517E 0x010E454E 0x01012F1D 0x01010696 0x010E5D12 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010E517E 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x01012C92 0x01010B57 0x010E5DBB 0x0101596C 0x01014E87 0x010141A0 0x010E8FF2 0x01014B45 ... Backtrace: 0x011594ED 0x0115955F 0x01001459 0x01021A5E 0x0114F2B6 0x7E418730 0x7E418812 0x7E4189C9 0x7E418A0C 0x0114DB00 0x0114DD9F 0x7C80B725 In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2013-05-10 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 112542 rgm@gnu.org-20130510102119-fklj7xlajezey0tr Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 13:34:13 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 17:34:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbwdZ-0003qh-5D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 13:34:13 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:43052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbwdV-0003qF-5x; Mon, 13 May 2013 13:34:10 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMQ00B00ZAHZW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 May 2013 20:33:24 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMQ00BSVZFLT6B0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 May 2013 20:33:22 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 20:33:13 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org, 13980@debbugs.gnu.org, 14062@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 13:01:55 -0700 > > Backtrace: > 0x011596ED > 0x0115975F > 0x010E82C7 > 0x0101596C > 0x01015146 > 0x0101329A > 0x0100F0E2 > 0x01015837 > 0x01014F59 > 0x010E517E > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010141F5 > 0x011CA1B5 > 0x011CA735 > 0x011D3CA9 > 0x01016530 > 0x010E5C83 > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010E517E > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010141F5 > 0x01025C4C > 0x01010C39 > 0x0102606A > 0x01014038 > 0x010260BE > 0x0102486D > 0x01010C39 > 0x01023814 > 0x01010696 > 0x0102377D > 0x01022D88 > 0x010C2439 > 0x010C3143 > 0x01014D87 > 0x010E517E > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010E517E > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010E517E > 0x010E454E > 0x01012F1D > 0x01010696 > 0x010E5D12 > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010E517E > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x01012C92 > 0x01010B57 > 0x010E5DBB > 0x0101596C > 0x01014E87 > 0x010141A0 > 0x010E8FF2 > 0x01014B45 > ... I think this part was with an earlier binary, not the one you reported (because the result of using this backtrace doesn't make any sense at all). What was the previous version you used? My guess is it was emacs-20130502-r112438-bin-i386.zip, which brings us to something very similar to bug #14236, #13154, and #13980: emacs_abort at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/w32fns.c:7822 emacs_abort at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/w32fns.c:7831 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:1958 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 apply_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2783 eval_sub at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2084 Fprogn at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:359 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2899 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2735 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 call0 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2453 select_frame_norecord at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/window.c:3091 set_window_buffer at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/window.c:3177 delete_all_child_windows at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/window.c:5885 unbind_to at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:3097 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:1066 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 call0 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2453 safe_run_hooks_1 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1875 internal_condition_case at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:1193 safe_run_hook_funcall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1930 run_hook_with_args at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2398 safe_run_hooks at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1947 command_loop_1 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1592 internal_condition_case at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:1193 command_loop_2 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1167 internal_catch at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:964 command_loop at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:1138 recursive_edit_1 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/keyboard.c:779 read_minibuf at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/minibuf.c:678 Fread_from_minibuffer at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/minibuf.c:980 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2700 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 Fbyte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:475 eval_sub at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2045 internal_catch at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:964 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:1081 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:900 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 eval_sub at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2011 internal_lisp_condition_case at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:1147 exec_byte_code at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/bytecode.c:1096 funcall_lambda at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2906 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2723 apply1 at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2435 Fcall_interactively at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/callint.c:378 Ffuncall at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/eval.c:2681 > Backtrace: > 0x011594ED > 0x0115955F > 0x01001459 > 0x01021A5E > 0x0114F2B6 > 0x7E418730 > 0x7E418812 > 0x7E4189C9 > 0x7E418A0C > 0x0114DB00 > 0x0114DD9F > 0x7C80B725 This part translates into this: w32_backtrace at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/w32fns.c:7739 emacs_abort at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/w32fns.c:7771 terminate_due_to_signal at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/emacs.c:343 die at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/alloc.c:6522 w32_wnd_proc at C:\Devel\emacs\repo\build\src/w32fns.c:3187 Which means my fix for bug #14062 did not solve it. Hmm... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 14:07:43 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 18:07:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38903 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubx9z-00059E-HY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:07:43 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:28362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubx9x-00058v-6k; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:07:42 -0400 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4DI7Afo009927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 May 2013 18:07:11 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DI79xB015379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 May 2013 18:07:10 GMT Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DI797E015374; Mon, 13 May 2013 18:07:09 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:07:09 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:07:08 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: Ac5QAAOLz7ONRqW0Rx2UoCdPOvKfTwAA6Tkg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org, 13980@debbugs.gnu.org, 14062@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) > I think this part was with an earlier binary, not the one you reported > (because the result of using this backtrace doesn't make any sense at > all). I don't think so. After the crash I brought up the same version to report it. I typically use only one Emacs 24 build at a time, the latest one I have (unless it is totally unusable). If I ever mistake the version (e.g. what crashed vs what I reported from) then it would likely be a completely different release (e.g. Emacs 23 vs 24). Not necessarily, but likely. > What was the previous version you used? The previous binary I have to the one I reported about (from 5/10), is from 5/4: In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2013-05-04 on ODIEONE Bzr revision: 112449 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20130504193419-kbd4imjj1yxr5ksz Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' > My guess is it was > emacs-20130502-r112438-bin-i386.zip, which brings us to something very > similar to bug #14236, #13154, and #13980 No, I have no binary from 5/2. The one I have prior to 5/4 is from 4/26. HTH. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 14:12:58 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 18:12:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbxF4-0005LT-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:12:58 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:44708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbxF1-0005L0-9n for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:12:56 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMR00F0018CC500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:25 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMR00FFS18P0V90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:25 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 21:12:16 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83hai692bj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <14389@debbugs.gnu.org>, <14062@debbugs.gnu.org>, <13980@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:07:08 -0700 > > > I think this part was with an earlier binary, not the one you reported > > (because the result of using this backtrace doesn't make any sense at > > all). > > I don't think so. After the crash I brought up the same version to report it. But the file you sent included 2 different backtraces, so there were 2 crashes, not one. > The previous binary I have to the one I reported about (from 5/10), is from 5/4: > > In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2013-05-04 on ODIEONE > Bzr revision: 112449 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca-20130504193419-kbd4imjj1yxr5ksz > Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 > Configured using: > `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags > -IC:/Devel/emacs/build/include --ldflags -LC:/Devel/emacs/build/lib' > > > My guess is it was > > emacs-20130502-r112438-bin-i386.zip, which brings us to something very > > similar to bug #14236, #13154, and #13980 > > No, I have no binary from 5/2. The one I have prior to 5/4 is from 4/26. Well, then maybe I'm mistaken. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 14:28:57 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 18:28:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbxUW-0005y9-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:28:57 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:30069) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbxUU-0005xs-3R for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 14:28:55 -0400 Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4DISN48032524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28:23 GMT Received: from userz7022.oracle.com (userz7022.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DISNL7021143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28:23 GMT Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by userz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DISNaC025254; Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28:23 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:28:22 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> <83hai692bj.fsf@gnu.org> Subject: RE: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:28:21 -0700 Message-ID: <75AF0F39E9564A73BB01BDF7D146EB67@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <83hai692bj.fsf@gnu.org> Thread-Index: Ac5QBW3yrHfNFupbRCeaasT/On9SOwAAe+7Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) > > I don't think so. After the crash I brought up the same > > version to report it. > > But the file you sent included 2 different backtraces, so there were 2 > crashes, not one. Really? I try to delete file emacs_backtrace.txt after I report a crash. (Maybe instead of appending to the same file, since the version is not recorded, Emacs should create a separate file, emacs_backtrace<2>.txt etc.?) > > No, I have no binary from 5/2. The one I have prior to 5/4 > > is from 4/26. > > Well, then maybe I'm mistaken. I cannot guarantee that I reported using the same version as the one that crashed. But I think I did. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 15:33:28 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 19:33:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbyUx-0000B2-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:33:27 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:27874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UbyUv-0000Aq-5i for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:33:26 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r4DJWr1x006747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 May 2013 19:32:54 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DJWrBR017219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 May 2013 19:32:54 GMT Received: from abhmt109.oracle.com (abhmt109.oracle.com [141.146.116.61]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4DJWrHZ017216; Mon, 13 May 2013 19:32:53 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.8) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:32:53 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com><83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org><83hai692bj.fsf@gnu.org> <75AF0F39E9564A73BB01BDF7D146EB67@us.oracle.com> Subject: RE: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:32:52 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <75AF0F39E9564A73BB01BDF7D146EB67@us.oracle.com> Thread-Index: Ac5QBW3yrHfNFupbRCeaasT/On9SOwAAe+7QAAJD/3A= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) > > > I don't think so. After the crash I brought up the same > > > version to report it. > > > > But the file you sent included 2 different backtraces, so > > there were 2 crashes, not one. > > Really? I try to delete file emacs_backtrace.txt after I > report a crash. > > (Maybe instead of appending to the same file, since the > version is not recorded, Emacs should create a separate file, > emacs_backtrace<2>.txt etc.?) BTW - just a thought. Sometimes, including for this bug, I get two fatal-error dialog boxes. Might that result in two backtraces in the same emacs_backtrace.txt? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 13 15:51:02 2013 Received: (at 14389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2013 19:51:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubyly-0000jo-9m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:51:02 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:39484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ubylv-0000jU-8c for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 15:51:00 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMR00G005O7BK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14389@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:50:06 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMR00FHW5RGWBA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 May 2013 22:50:06 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 22:49:56 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#14389: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Drew Adams Message-id: <83ehda8xsr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7821C978D03548ABB5B4CA297EA9D7E2@us.oracle.com> <83li7i944m.fsf@gnu.org> <83hai692bj.fsf@gnu.org> <75AF0F39E9564A73BB01BDF7D146EB67@us.oracle.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14389 Cc: 14389@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <14389@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:32:52 -0700 > > BTW - just a thought. Sometimes, including for this bug, I get two fatal-error > dialog boxes. Might that result in two backtraces in the same > emacs_backtrace.txt? Anything's possible when a program is crashing. But the first backtrace doesn't make sense at all, it points to code lines that cannot possibly crash, like a simple assignment of a simple variable. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 05 19:08:09 2014 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 00:08:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51515 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCVl-0002PI-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:08:09 -0500 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCVi-0002PA-SS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:08:07 -0500 Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCVV-0007PO-FL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:07:53 +0100 Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:06:50 -0800 Message-Id: <87ha8d14v9.fsf@building.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14389 X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBCVV-0007PO-FL X-Netfonds-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Netfonds-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392250073.95006@wLou085i2Uh7Lhag0Ny0gQ X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) close 14389 From unknown Tue Jun 24 22:36:45 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator