GNU bug report logs - #14361
Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 17:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #25 received at 14361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: 14361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ludo <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14361: Building guile 2.0.9 under mingw + msys
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:51:45 +0300
> From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
> Cc: 14361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  ludo <at> gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:52:37 +0200
> 
> On Tue 21 Jun 2016 17:42, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
> >> Cc: 14361 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  ludo <at> gnu.org
> >> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:06:05 +0200
> >> 
> >> Let's give it a go!  I understand that you do not want to work with
> >> gnulib.  That's a negative from a Guile POV -- but it's not a
> >> deal-breaker.
> >
> > I have nothing against Gnulib, but in this case their solution is
> > simply not up to speed.
> >
> >> To that end I hesitate about including a bunch more stuff in
> >> posix.c.  Must it all be there, or would it be possible to move some
> >> of it out to our own gnulib-like mingw-w32.[ch] or something?
> >
> > Most of it is already on a separate file, w32-proc.c (see the diffs).
> > I could take the macros at the beginning of posix.c and put them on a
> > separate .h file, if that would be better.
> 
> That would be great, if you'd be amenable.  Thanks!

Done and posted on guile-devel.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 53 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.