From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 07 03:27:16 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2013 07:27:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZcIs-0008EO-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 03:27:16 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZcIq-0008EG-7A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 03:27:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZcHq-0007gp-4F; Tue, 07 May 2013 03:26:10 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: read-from-minibuffer to respect standard-input X-Spook: csim cryptanalysis insurgency Ft. Meade quarter DES red X-Ran: \4^5TLa`4Ps^.=PT(Hvo-!6y\1Dl_{b?:PE\\@?;eM;[D,*p2Ta*n1c*wSp.g=d4OOxP"v X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 03:26:09 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Package: emacs Version: 24.3 Severity: wishlist read-from-minibuffer doesn't seem to respect standard-input != t. It's probably not supposed to, but it might be nice if it did, so that batch tests could be written for read-number etc. (It seems that it does read from stdin if noninteractive.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 10 09:38:13 2022 Received: (at 14359) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2022 13:38:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60791 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ45-0008No-KY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:38:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55320) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ43-0008NS-SP for 14359@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:38:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MxxXl0RZ2Y/mBabgK099GcUzhajAoySAvrVJ6HEbeWI=; b=r8iDMo+LHrAXVR7od8YrRYJNLE 5O1yr7c2Br9X03sQ3NtK0SmlL09tRMMr/EPn6QH7a7e+jsM0vT3MB23a+0CKAZpG+x6EOVWJUOFLa J+NCrNNAw1GqoXau8HILhxW6lioelIGF1g8dVj8fGYkF7d7i5v/BgpPSjceCO7wv4mzk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ3t-00041x-TX; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:38:04 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14359: read-from-minibuffer to respect standard-input References: X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Don Juan's Reckless Daughter_: "Talk to Me" Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:38:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 07 May 2013 03:26:09 -0400") Message-ID: <87ilqdh5ja.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Glenn Morris writes: > read-from-minibuffer doesn't seem to respect standard-input != t. > It's probably not supposed to, but it might be nice if it did, so > that batch tests could be written for read-number etc. > (It s [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14359 Cc: 14359@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Glenn Morris writes: > read-from-minibuffer doesn't seem to respect standard-input != t. > It's probably not supposed to, but it might be nice if it did, so > that batch tests could be written for read-number etc. > (It seems that it does read from stdin if noninteractive.) I'm probably missing something, but wouldn't you just stub out read-from-minibuffer if you want to test read-number from ert? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 10 09:38:21 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2022 13:38:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60794 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ4C-0008O9-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:38:20 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ4B-0008Nw-Bs for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:38:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9bRof7dEXfhUFSDhBtSjyMyvSh5RXHYbBxuiDM/Ytgs=; b=KUInh6C6gVxtwzdMyhdxCJ0YAE qBfe39bY42zPKbHd4cZlzZpMEnk+CLlH8yMASQp6yNIlIdPve9CvTsE1WO6LXOx2H4n/Oso8GtBfr 0CnC76wHv2fegY5jDn1Gwbf0U4kqXGLY5q9P8lXX0H+DrC80R+0zKbnZzTPJ2CvXQb9Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noQ3z-000425-N4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:38:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:38:07 +0200 Message-Id: <87h75xh5j4.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14359 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 14359 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 14359 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 09 10:11:40 2022 Received: (at 14359) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2022 14:11:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIsu-0006we-5V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:11:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50246) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIss-0006wK-74 for 14359@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:11:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1ylBOsShY7gCAw4B58NEMNBX4vHAW3oY37x3neaoILE=; b=ejwm8BOIwwa7fG3DEC8k2XCjPE otoVzMX20OrQz9I0G/PeNYJXavJmBKDffdke21fPimHMYfCB1IvG7532hFB4yoJ0rODl21b1zYfpe Nj2RI8ixsdSUH3dxh3nYEf7XdUddyK4dNx7DqHDd4VIBl7XmsELZPAQ305Ax7JFcFEbk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIsj-0000iU-Vg; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:11:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14359: read-from-minibuffer to respect standard-input References: <87ilqdh5ja.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Prince's _Sign 'O' the Times (7): Live in Utrecht II_: "The Cross (Live In Utrecht)" Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:11:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ilqdh5ja.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 10 May 2022 15:38:01 +0200") Message-ID: <87fske2agf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > >> read-from-minibuffer doesn't seem to respect standard-input != t. >> It's probably not supposed to, but it might be nice if it did, so >> that batch tests cou [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14359 Cc: 14359@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > >> read-from-minibuffer doesn't seem to respect standard-input != t. >> It's probably not supposed to, but it might be nice if it did, so >> that batch tests could be written for read-number etc. >> (It seems that it does read from stdin if noninteractive.) > > I'm probably missing something, but wouldn't you just stub out > read-from-minibuffer if you want to test read-number from ert? No response in a month, so I'm going to go ahead and guess that my suggestion would fit the purpose, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 09 10:11:45 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2022 14:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIsz-0006x0-Eg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:11:45 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIsx-0006wV-Mu for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:11:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KqsnOynBh9JYgYfcXmyOA/3XwrvFfJ2y3kJtJeQwSdU=; b=VRabWBr3COUIU95iGhfmzFW0IE FNORi3tyfk+8DJBgV6VJC4R1ri6wPqra1ZuQ4X/nhdW151/nYjTV8Zb/eB5DXmasC8a1U9/vyWS2z E/0+XOVXMhgRn+668MESSA9f6Qd12R4levaU45AFWOZEiB43kfiW525lKIuSbUksEHOo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzIsq-0000ie-6a for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:11:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:11:35 +0200 Message-Id: <87edzy2ag8.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #14359 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 14359 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 14359 quit From unknown Thu Sep 11 16:39:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator