From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 02 22:40:30 2013 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 02:40:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5vC-0004cu-2N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:40:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5v7-0004cR-VI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:40:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5uR-0008Cu-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:39:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:35473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5uR-0008Cq-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:39:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5uN-00083h-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:39:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5uK-0008BP-5a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:39:39 -0400 Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu ([18.9.25.12]:45172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UY5uK-0008BL-29 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 22:39:36 -0400 X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7f566d000004c69-82-51832367aac0 Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 8E.24.19561.76323815; Thu, 2 May 2013 22:39:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r432dYg7017864 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 22:39:35 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.173] ([12.198.236.170]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r432dUvw016153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 22:39:34 -0400 From: chad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install Message-Id: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:39:30 -0700 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrJuu3Bxo8PiGtsX3A1UOjB5t08wC GKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mr72PmMsWMtecXZFG2MD4zvWLkZODgkBE4kL108wQ9hiEhfurWfr YuTiEBLYxyix9M9TRgjnDKPEhZu/mKEyTBKrJ+5g72Lk4GATkAFq0QDpZhbQkrjx7yUThK0t sWzha7CpwgLGEn/e7WcEKecVsJI42MUPEmYRUJF49XsRO4gtIiAp8fVOK9hBvAJ6Ete+fWWH OEhW4vXzNywTGPlmIdkwC8mGWUhaFjAyr2KUTcmt0s1NzMwpTk3WLU5OzMtLLdI11MvNLNFL TSndxAgOL0meHYxvDiodYhTgYFTi4VVoaQoUYk0sK67MPcQoycGkJMorIt0cKMSXlJ9SmZFY nBFfVJqTWnyIUYKDWUmE1+0HUDlvSmJlVWpRPkxKmoNFSZz3cspNfyGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpis DAeHkgSvqRLQUMGi1PTUirTMnBKENBMHJ8hwHqDhsiA1vMUFibnFmekQ+VOMilLivAwgCQGQ REZpHlwvLP5fMYoDvSLM6wFSxQNMHXDdr4AGMwEN3llVDzK4JBEhJdXAqNnX8m2/DQtra9Gj 31FBVg96UjcdMbQ8zGZy+sdpVYPi41Y/tKPywzq+6L++/lw7neWIr8l9RQP/EhP3n7yuAhp/ CiV33jj2KjUvzynx+n7t+1eLnoa5PuoOmuvRcaghYjv/0tB4C2f+3x976tpvrS+L5t61O6bT iufXhgfSlwWbehNeeJ9QYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAKm85udoCAAA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) Attempting to install the package `ack', I get: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Error during download request: = Not Found") signal(error ("Error during download request: Not Found")) error("Error during download request:%s" " Not Found") package-handle-response() package-download-tar(ack "1.1") package-download-transaction((ack)) package-install(ack) mapc(package-install (ack)) package-menu-execute() call-interactively(package-menu-execute nil nil) command-execute(package-menu-execute) This problem has persisted over several days, at least. To repeat from = emacs -Q: M-x package-list-packages i x I verified that other packages can be installed and upgraded, and that ack can be neither installed nor upgraded (I first noticed it when trying to upgrade, not with emacs -Q). ~Chad =09 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 03:50:14 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 07:50:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAkv-00026b-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:50:14 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59129) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAkt-00026P-DC for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:50:12 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAkE-0005lI-NG; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:49:30 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: chad Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> X-Spook: Armani strategic Blowfish enigma munitions Mahmoud X-Ran: QYn*uQ><~k:8~c'i\7kueE?* X-Hue: blue X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 03:49:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> (chad's message of "Thu, 2 May 2013 19:39:30 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.7 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.4 (---------) The package version is 1.01. (version-to-list "1.01") -> (1 1) Hence http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/archive-contents refers to version 1.1. Hence it tries to download the non-existent http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack-1.1.tar rather than http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack-1.01.tar For good measure, http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack.html thinks the latest version is 1.0 for some reason. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 03:58:53 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 07:58:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAtG-0002bb-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:58:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:46214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYAtE-0002bR-Pf for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 03:58:49 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id rq8so782153pbb.19 for <14338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 00:58:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=B9YX0orTdulxdM4eb15E/G6fg2SxECh8smlRpK34vtU=; b=kuzUwBUg752ng4xgTU1THXdG+Rw9wtlhQTO6M5iVkunaDYad9xj2zPwubdLuWGY7dc /0U71R8al3gIfJLcOr7JnF1WjJH2XEbVVqfu0AITwDk0P4UY/hlHoiuVw4hOUEDQnawr 8Hafv2/47HEZc57xxqz80O4fI80/8l12/RwX61P71hgWuJbG2orE3NVS2ajYaGue/+Vm gdeMY0s/2X/xEKgfqR2uZvt27dV2Gi7eGtiwSPFupUTwFK7MVydN2qzghOZpsUbsAvmd AGvPA3ztwM/T30xFxPXou4nUBeQEkyUBNQyY4uz6r/9Pxk9Eq7KhALEdqF/JqOKyvyZM bbfA== X-Received: by 10.66.150.165 with SMTP id uj5mr13533395pab.37.1367567889006; Fri, 03 May 2013 00:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Zeuss-MacBook.local ([110.172.225.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ih1sm10663583pbb.44.2013.05.03.00.58.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 03 May 2013 00:58:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Liu To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 15:57:59 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 03 May 2013 03:49:30 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 2013-05-03 15:49 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > The package version is 1.01. > (version-to-list "1.01") -> (1 1) > Hence http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/archive-contents refers to version 1.1. > Hence it tries to download the non-existent > http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack-1.1.tar > rather than > http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack-1.01.tar > > For good measure, > http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/ack.html > thinks the latest version is 1.0 for some reason. What should be done here to get it in sync? BTW, increment the version number is an annoyance. I wonder if people feel the same way too? Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 12:02:07 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 16:02:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYIQx-0000qY-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:02:07 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYIQv-0000qP-Ef for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:02:06 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYIQF-0006yo-QS; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:01:24 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> X-Spook: IRA codes airframe blackjack bemd lynch Mahmoud X-Ran: SDDonzeK[2Iuqhel"ewL-${k*g'od_vc]@}=5~nihJ1hsAteM)qXe:CNUz4\-t"U`z$Z,@ X-Hue: blue X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:01:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 03 May 2013 15:57:59 +0800") Message-ID: <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -7.6 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.5 (---------) Leo Liu wrote: > What should be done here to get it in sync? Maybe use a version that is not zero padded. Is 1.01 supposed to be the same as 1.1, or not? > BTW, increment the version number is an annoyance. I wonder if people > feel the same way too? I have no opinion. The motivation is in packages/README: This cron job only creates a new package when the "version" (as specified in the foo-pkg.el or in the "Version:" header) of a package is modified. This means that you can safely work on the next version here without worrying about the unstable code making it to GNU ELPA, and simply update the "version" when you want to release the new code. Seems sensible. Surely there needs to be some way to prevent every change going live immediately? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 12:04:45 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 16:04:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57203 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYITU-0000zH-Uf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:04:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:40106) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYITT-0000zA-GP for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:04:43 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYISn-0004e3-T0; Fri, 03 May 2013 12:04:02 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: South Africa Syria ASDIC nuclear csim UMTS Adriatic UNSCOM X-Ran: &|&`;t),gYD_R_;E6.8^#IZUZ>_XaT:>=k:)~G'{,_8}RvM<`AR7{,[dAT]R'{^?A:+E1* X-Hue: green X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 12:04:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 03 May 2013 12:01:23 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -7.6 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.5 (---------) PS grep suggests same issue in sokoban.el. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 03 16:55:21 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2013 20:55:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57379 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYN0j-00057g-Dj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 16:55:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:49064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYN0h-00057U-BZ for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 16:55:20 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v10so1106931pde.4 for <14338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 13:54:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=9Zeb8OkGoxAA6ElYQ29J5ueqtv4Cgyq9aROuPYzTlRc=; b=Fz4Q2a0VkaYcctKTmU2X0a5GirHf+51Zog/L21lFHJZZIIF29vnn4yGBj5QYmEIof/ 3OkvxppRIlNIzuJ2l6PBGYYpIaTihOW2SGy3a/T6mn2W/XyaBjuP7yOEntS2EGcZnHHb I87sIYWG8Vwh+uKM2Q3R5JZye5N06FNu8KVDiD9ssJrTXMQ/d0hlehChhP8dBa8pwAXz AEMMNLpqEigvnMkx6kB2PUxHV4oFiLC5wzsxY2LkMawdG5qijlypW/iA0a+O/NKLXC6s RfuAmU/Jsc/fQSSPKLCxekx8BDaV+4hvzw/1DNQO00BPnQiz+Ys+sgMOLWCfGwC0LKcL O6+g== X-Received: by 10.66.151.46 with SMTP id un14mr16818862pab.14.1367614476709; Fri, 03 May 2013 13:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Zeuss-MacBook.local ([110.172.225.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lq5sm14155952pab.19.2013.05.03.13.54.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 03 May 2013 13:54:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Liu To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAMFBMVEUaFRZLMy1dTENxVzKQ WiCrXQ97cmO/dSqSh3akjGTApXy5sJ7Sxo/Sz8Xo6eP9//xJbkruAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlw SFlzAAACxQAAAsUBidZ/7wAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMJOwHXewoAAAIBSURBVCjPVdNBiNNAFADQ6J4F x3hThHZBBC+WCFI8SS0iezRDcMHLHkLAg6gJH/fgYQ9xYlj2sLK4KHgqCgXFhda2Idmr4kkQPZQ0 nkQMbTypbMmMM2m7ZgYSmMef/5OZPwo7HFnx3uKPcmj0Dht1LWZJ+Hvr7dIFZXRUwl9VRTuuKDJ+ U44gjscknK4hhJaCkYRsWjmBtLqXlJAG2wipNe18OZJu1BBq1E8xafl4s6Jq2mUZGftU1y7CCxnp FVUDWJXx4C66BKBnErbuoaYNtoRTu6EZBsCbMn7W+5qOAR6WvxNOby9jHWC9hAf3n304CdiAByXs 3Nh9roLDkyb/sWV712vYwaLSAn8CPMHIAAzOPDKP2COAFm4Y4ODVWc6xG7KXsN7UeUJjjimx2uwd gCgNhr0i8C/xyCD5CiCKAMY3Bf5oDzx//w/fimscdcAZU2jv9sedx6+nYPPFIoWI/GK6QZ+EFGOR ErAjCnV3vPZ7XqlTIMbOLY7fLcvvmT7rXNWaGDexIY44N12TG2PDp7vqyl57dnCeuWwyNpnEURxk fTbDYeBnKRn4oejPYI4sH6WviBumEZ/GxX4X/x6EcURFZ7E071bjQGAxpcOAEOJuTiroDEea5Szv rVWLYfl7ZiQwSUToxrkux7OLixAWGz22+HIyWTRYcVfomOwvzusfjtVIGgLHf3MAAAAASUVORK5C YII= Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 04:54:35 +0800 In-Reply-To: <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 03 May 2013 12:01:23 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On 2013-05-04 00:01 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > Maybe use a version that is not zero padded. > Is 1.01 supposed to be the same as 1.1, or not? OK, I have bumped the version to 1.2. On 2013-05-04 00:04 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > PS grep suggests same issue in sokoban.el. This version number was from XEmacs. I wonder if the archiver can be more flexible. The versioning scheme isn't peculiar. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 14:35:41 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2013 18:35:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhJ7-0006Ae-C5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:35:41 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:34720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhJ4-0006AQ-AT for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:35:39 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhII-0001Dt-9g; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:34:50 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: defense information warfare MILSATCOM BCCI War on X-Ran: fD**"p?^[yy^"^~x$^/H4@X2'd)>.['RpH:2 X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 14:34:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sat, 04 May 2013 04:54:35 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.4 (---------) Leo Liu wrote: > I wonder if the archiver can be more flexible. The versioning scheme > isn't peculiar. If you want 1.01 (or 1.001 etc) to be different to 1.1 (do you? I don't know), then I don't think that can be done without an incompatible change to archive-contents. But if 1.01 is the same as 1.1, that can probably be made to work. But then why not just write 1.1. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 14:57:08 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2013 18:57:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhdq-00074U-Gz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:57:07 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhdn-00074D-GZ for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:57:05 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UYhd1-0004E3-Hg; Sat, 04 May 2013 14:56:15 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: Audiotel radar mailbomb cracking Bin Laden Saudi Arabia X-Ran: {<0nbC4r17E/R7!BkS'oT-b%)#F1B"o?"W6qZR}1rVC30(W[9a[9SSCYvPv!u'N(u6=g:C X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 14:56:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sat, 04 May 2013 04:54:35 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -9.4 (---------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -9.4 (---------) Leo Liu wrote: >> PS grep suggests same issue in sokoban.el. > > This version number was from XEmacs. I wonder if the archiver can be > more flexible. The versioning scheme isn't peculiar. Actually, I see the sokoban-pkg.el file contains 1.0.4, so it probably works. Clearly there is ambiguity in what "1.04" means. 1.4 or 1.0.4? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 04 22:37:53 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2013 02:37:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYopl-0002Bx-3Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 22:37:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:37292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYopi-0002Ap-2K for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2013 22:37:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p11so1483145pdj.12 for <14338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 04 May 2013 19:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=HKmF1gtKVav58UlfpGvrNTLW/sEfdlbapD/qUyM8UzU=; b=t4fNmeTMD1+JTOSAun8ZnAYn6tf0c04ZOvH0wL5YXFgHI1R6ypBSAO2+qLA8opXrJe kp0EZHQzmQHjLcP1qB/9faLsSKVamhQuv8TyoyOgcCkUtGbSvUN6su4tj17TUVl+beHc a1bxBqKAl5DLsHiCPRx58ZArLh27IbqwuLoTIi1n76nPGSLcbyI36McAEt4o04Q2gqGi WHFOANvOrg0VJPk+gXCsSjt1qsv8qeQ8Y2VOrnXmaJ/1zBZZD9kGYwkellrjrR8Fd/JI lSdATrVm0H/OAj4tJ36DThBrdBrFeQcK4KT2lrV1wRKR8BM4RoOXrWFxOeZPz0E1e6+1 dkCg== X-Received: by 10.68.92.165 with SMTP id cn5mr20518699pbb.50.1367721420467; Sat, 04 May 2013 19:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Zeuss-MacBook.local ([119.161.133.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id li15sm19410310pab.2.2013.05.04.19.36.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 04 May 2013 19:36:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Liu To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 10:36:59 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat, 04 May 2013 14:56:15 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On 2013-05-05 02:56 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > Actually, I see the sokoban-pkg.el file contains 1.0.4, so it probably > works. Clearly there is ambiguity in what "1.04" means. 1.4 or 1.0.4? I am glad it was written as 1.0.4 (might have been a typo of 1.04). I suppose we have resolved all issues in this bug. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 20:21:09 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2013 00:21:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ9Ay-0005dV-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 20:21:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ9Ax-0005dL-0v for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 20:21:07 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ9A2-00029i-SA; Sun, 05 May 2013 20:20:10 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Leo Liu Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: JUWTF Freeh assassinate e-cash Rule Psix halcon BATF X-Ran: SqQ2[sTHZZr,Qh!DFHw|{Lo"Z25of{$;VB=$3jELJNzFwJbGHg*!<>Y`IbN(KC8FSGyw4u X-Hue: magenta X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:20:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sun, 05 May 2013 10:36:59 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -6.7 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Leo Liu wrote: > On 2013-05-05 02:56 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Actually, I see the sokoban-pkg.el file contains 1.0.4, so it probably >> works. Clearly there is ambiguity in what "1.04" means. 1.4 or 1.0.4? > > I am glad it was written as 1.0.4 (might have been a typo of 1.04). I > suppose we have resolved all issues in this bug. I'm not trying to difficult, but I really would like to know what this version scheme means. Could you explain it? Is 1.01 the same as 1.1, just written differently for sorting purposes? (IIUC, you added both ack and sokoban.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 05 21:55:24 2013 Received: (at 14338) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2013 01:55:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZAeC-0001q9-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 21:55:24 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:58441) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZAe8-0001pg-Gd for 14338@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 21:55:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx1so1761248pab.41 for <14338@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 May 2013 18:54:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=1WcQXitWeupkMl+TbA4zA1PFcjivmw/0iRLTEWxFwuM=; b=YFMfoSGLsxCVbpfzJwZnmO3L/IQwEWHT3xslukZ7Df7Gc7yw3DsV4ZWh73XBaLDe92 cFvXZRS3LyC2VVSG/gfZWySHBZv2CAWzBAL1UHQ75Ht+xGL7FcfYfbivZTuWlYXxpW9b biUP4ohRxe2E5GJhtHBRceMZqocedfvJ1uGDT/zTNrojeb2JwddBP6IwZakhVsGy2+dj 7DFGwuVBivlR2tKjQOjTtRRf6si8ZeAmJN+gLsFcUTj98JDAaW0ZWqJ2pg0MrOaXAWsy njPCbP98JbsYP6vLzJf803m2lcJouljH/+lyLGZ6KvwUP5n3ep4rswqUho1mAaOeHsjp cFnA== X-Received: by 10.68.218.34 with SMTP id pd2mr23390538pbc.204.1367805265309; Sun, 05 May 2013 18:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Zeuss-MacBook.local (li511-224.members.linode.com. [66.175.216.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vu10sm21652446pbc.27.2013.05.05.18.54.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 May 2013 18:54:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Liu To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#14338: 24.3.50; ELPA package ack fails to install References: <8640ACE9-21CC-4F2E-8DD0-EFB672F30485@mit.edu> <9ghaikvyr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:54:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 05 May 2013 20:20:10 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 14338 Cc: chad , 14338@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 2013-05-06 08:20 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > I'm not trying to difficult, but I really would like to know what this > version scheme means. Could you explain it? Is 1.01 the same as 1.1, > just written differently for sorting purposes? (IIUC, you added both ack > and sokoban.) It was supposed to mean 1.1 but padded with 0. I was thinking 1.9 is written as 1.09 and it is clearly smaller than 1.10 etc. But 1.04 was the number used by xemacs and I have no idea why it was picked up. Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 30 01:01:06 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2017 06:01:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cY51V-0006GC-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 01:01:06 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:35712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cY51U-0006Fc-3F for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 01:01:04 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j18so100341012ioe.2 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:01:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=SQTuvVgHUr71orIJTlhNcj+3Oxy8+0n5qsqpg5UevVc=; b=a+odDGEwCCFChHKGVJlTTG95smOUabjk+vayUe9ILzu50LoToLVE+akby3W/UPTHQq Eeer3Te4+jqwJhwfw/pRl6bEzNtUoXcutS8fXWWV3je0SCYxYwiSwn2ixjRjSVWx+Wp0 gFu0+BFKzUwdoSyz/rZtcqBAW6NbC1jsJ/OOXkhQBTAqAcH41vOkV8rKejlE72rOd8J3 NxfAKhfwV3szjf2BgFsejzgshUtPKkzTdOcaWb6RXQikIuMt9j0bbYjuEI2PGSeZIlsO SPokn52yDqigIvvhy3F9jBiMVZPJ30TbV6PQBY9I4GWh5Ngg4wCwg3U0SZqN8/Kz4SwM 2EqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=SQTuvVgHUr71orIJTlhNcj+3Oxy8+0n5qsqpg5UevVc=; b=ndc4/dn4jVpizByPYhTAW5F6mHOBU7q1OQMOkFGp0mht2ybEMKfdQtcPSxxkiuSy1Y hyeRRSAXk+WPrmTj7/xoosmbi95Bw7sZfJOO/NwVwk+RC+Rzt0ykZNUpz5s7Zds/YLVp m9bkqeMjaSkAvJu+h9p+EI38Pnx0F8ht1b0tUiaLoEK4WUpA1ggOE5Pyn2gVaOLMPLFH y833fs3w7m/MB44tWYtsBVQzsykcUZGIJ8U4MTctq2Vf9lVRTV9BbFDw/AfeM1v5Uney Y2C0fFriZTyHnNJNVdHATsPlppMNq0AODxIqHN5JZf11684lla+Kcu3XZ8FTT9b69k6z IyfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKlP/ygXc9bO4d/1yGDJLZ0kcgxE3BJlZ06kvpe6CGDIxGgD4E9vglxId1FE3I63g== X-Received: by 10.107.134.36 with SMTP id i36mr17828685iod.168.1485756058407; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v197sm7601534ita.2.2017.01.29.22.00.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:00:57 -0800 (PST) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #14338 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 01:02:04 -0500 Message-ID: <87vasxqe5f.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) tags 14338 fixed close 14338 quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 05:09:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator