Subject: bug#14332: 24.3; Octave indentation bug

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 17:37:39 -0400

>> The rule looks OK, but why not put it inside the subsequent
>> `syntax-propertize-rules'?
> Wouldn't this (octave-syntax-propertize-sqs end) before the
> syntax-propertize-rules form causes some \'s to be missed?

No, octave-syntax-propertize-sqs just skips over the contents of
single-quoted strings and from what you say you only want to handle
backslash in double-quoted strings.

        Stefan