From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:08:09 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#1428 <1428@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#1428 <1428@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: backtrace from edebug does not have links Reply-To: bug#1428 <1428@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:08:09 +0000 retitle 1428 backtrace from edebug does not have links reassign 1428 emacs submitter 1428 Dan Nicolaescu severity 1428 wishlist tag 1428 fixed thanks From dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu Tue Nov 25 08:42:27 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 25 Nov 2008 16:42:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAPGgPkH031833 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:42:26 -0800 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L50zY-0008AY-SQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L50zV-00085T-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:23 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38415 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L50zV-00085B-0v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:21 -0500 Received: from sallyv2.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.120]:54181) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L50zU-0005Dc-Ej for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:42:20 -0500 Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id mAPFxXno001886 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dann@localhost) by mothra.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id mAPFxWQI016550; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:59:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:59:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> From: Dan Nicolaescu To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: backtrace from edebug does not have links Lines: 5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: mAPFxXno001886 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* buffer when using debug-on-error. It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. From cyd@stupidchicken.com Sat Nov 29 18:22:51 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at control) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Nov 2008 02:22:52 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAU2Mnt7013852 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:22:50 -0800 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C699957E09E; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:22:49 -0500 (EST) From: Chong Yidong To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: reclassify bugs Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:22:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87r64uc5qe.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii severity 1428 wishlist severity 1443 wishlist severity 1443 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Nov 13 20:11:45 2010 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2010 01:11:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHR8C-0007UD-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:11:45 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHR8B-0007U7-Bi for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:11:43 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60579) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHRCs-0003WK-MW; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:16:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19679.14450.496454.934643@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:16:34 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control Subject: merge 1428 7393 X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: green X-Ran: @hOy-6w\E:B^_{-3@5xf7d&fB:UT5[imix2i\Yp.AwA-}vVrh$LD@CVe:LLuC-Z4b{\ X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -6.2 (------) forcemerge 1428 7393 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 13 18:45:16 2012 Received: (at 1428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2012 23:45:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx5a7-0004EI-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:45:16 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:58234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx5a5-0004E4-E9 for 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:45:14 -0500 Received: from moweb001.kundenserver.de (moweb001.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.114]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4635B1B129CCC for <1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:43:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from snow.dragon ([82.113.119.109]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LkPW7-1SUEiV1XXH-00bY3n; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:43:33 +0100 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Dan Nicolaescu Subject: Re: bug#1428: backtrace from edebug does not have links References: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:44:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:59:32 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:6YmL7AFyQqcIempsLUAelFlmrfi6N9zlC+N+0eiGeaL KWrcHZjPY81CIFqqp/HDK1cY8Km1hyZU0aOJDluVPreNdeAK62 uK1DI6YKDMkvFVJb/QXG5QeIuIXqrfIr8ralKtQ/z/aIXC/gHT rrYB+iOH3sJ0tlnTdvUcDra5rHNr9OK+SxG+APhbj8TRpq425+ IpjEz9HAW76/UYUKhg+muVuGS9q50fWuXw/fzMSIv0= X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer > does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* > buffer when using debug-on-error. > It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.192.234 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1428 Cc: 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: michael_heerdegen@web.de List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer > does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* > buffer when using debug-on-error. > It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.192.234 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server Dan Nicolaescu writes: > In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer > does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* > buffer when using debug-on-error. > It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see docstring)? However, until that happens, maybe this problem should be solved. Can't we just append some code like this: (goto-char (point-min)) (while (progn (goto-char (+ (point) 2)) (skip-syntax-forward "^w_") (not (eobp))) (let* ((beg (point)) (end (progn (skip-syntax-forward "w_") (point))) (sym (intern-soft (buffer-substring-no-properties beg end))) (file (and sym (symbol-file sym 'defun)))) (when file (goto-char beg) ;; help-xref-button needs to operate on something matched ;; by a regexp, so set that up for it. (re-search-forward "\\(\\sw\\|\\s_\\)+") (help-xref-button 0 'help-function-def sym file))) (forward-line 1)) to `edebug-backtrace' (the code is from `debugger-make-xrefs')? Thanks, Michael. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 21 14:45:14 2012 Received: (at 1428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2012 18:45:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAQX3-0006q5-SO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:45:14 -0400 Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:53555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAQX2-0006pv-1Y for 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:45:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokGAKU/KE9FxKFU/2dsb2JhbACBX48mjVV5iHCeGYYZBJsZhAk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="169220923" Received: from 69-196-161-84.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.161.84]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2012 14:14:28 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6B72558C3D; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:14:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: michael_heerdegen@web.de Subject: Re: bug#1428: backtrace from edebug does not have links Message-ID: References: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:14:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:44:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [206.248.154.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1428 Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [206.248.154.183 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? > However, until that happens, maybe this problem should be solved. (defalias 'edebug-debug 'debug) might be a good replacement in the mean time. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 03 14:36:35 2018 Received: (at 1428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2018 18:36:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewF-000417-B3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:36:35 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:44840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewD-00040t-IU; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 14:36:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=+cvhl+YJGGoOpjCMxazF4TbVLEvKEsjhLoK/RPwgJ9Q=; b=FUm3gTNa3B9cmsAayUuTc3L3Zj ignmEb5ULlJdxloAQLRCi9+e7bGpAA97bYe5CD3V6ZXJec5INsNHUKz2EhMQNUeBfS6/nMH5KMKbG yGcMWLBQou/p+teG7pCq9Odan6xHUrsUQDXic2GUpljyg/SIF7BqHAAizrklFP8xQ0iMNX5axS0m6 wlfw7OHVtIVBlgeaWfJx3hfoFFh6GpGUOjqxVgKuP+UTAFf8f17w9rM48UnxDnRVvtt86wbtEvnZz OwoAAR/25OUYsKg5ns4rnWZyyXJh32lAcAxsIxvCCkJag6sYwsGwBI0bdsd9qZdFYmsD3Za5Ni/jB Qa8+UXoA==; Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flewA-0005Rq-Tz; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:36:31 +0200 Received: by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1flevz-0003VY-V0; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:36:20 +0200 From: Gemini Lasswell To: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: bug#1428: backtrace from edebug does not have links References: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:36:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:44:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87va8rmh5q.fsf@runbox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? [...] Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [91.220.196.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [91.220.196.211 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gazally[at]runbox.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1428 Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, 1428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [91.220.196.211 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [91.220.196.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gazally[at]runbox.com) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server tags 1428 fixed close 1428 27.1 thanks Michael Heerdegen writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> In edebug when using d to show the backtrace, the *Backtrace* buffer >> does not have links to the functions that you get in the *Backtrace* >> buffer when using debug-on-error. >> It would be nice if the links would work for the edebug case too. > > Maybe nobody implements that because `edebug-backtrace' is planned to be > rewritten so that it gets better than "Better than nothing..." (see > docstring)? I've just pushed to Emacs master that long-anticipated rewrite of edebug-backtrace, which includes making links to functions. Gemini From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 03 21:56:35 2018 Received: (at 1428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2018 01:56:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fllo3-0002Dm-2o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 21:56:35 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:38497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fllo0-0002DY-LS for 1428@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 21:56:33 -0400 Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.214.151]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MN47k-1fsOa12qYS-006e8h; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 03:56:17 +0200 From: Michael Heerdegen To: Gemini Lasswell Subject: Re: bug#1428: backtrace from edebug does not have links References: <200811251559.mAPFxWQI016550@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87k43ql2mg.fsf@web.de> <87va8rmh5q.fsf@runbox.com> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 03:56:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87va8rmh5q.fsf@runbox.com> (Gemini Lasswell's message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:36:17 -0700") Message-ID: <87600qx5c1.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/4w7ylxu3g+G6ovo1PNdyytprnC9nsJfBCTPmUz/eOSJT+j9hyJ 62MINaGZyb74OmT0dNFgLawuxnYYWt26opP9j6MoQ2d5PiLHagFNfgMTD+bJspn0ZyBbSAB CYML0upmiQzx4JzGZpwSKarE6r8R2g4+r5av7Zhn3xNGdnMNF468pA1Y3bESK7/zx3Hu1Bk LBWxaaMkXVOAqupNbWAcg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:koLrRAabSZ4=:/CnOvFno6Ikd1lr/jsF4ML Gv68ynn13RojtEVBwsy/WWhi5qA0M2aP6Ec3VvTyb2DRO8jbJdOk1xqVbOKzssrTh97ZSatmA xmpeBFolq3SHiU3EOLixc0OUQnUK7Cp0HhYj4LjBtcQ7YQn2uF5YYt73ehHXrXXk7DTbtSS6j 3TjrwoIVowf10M7uAIbAjDV4OR7A9jHd6GuskESANk/EGk/MtN9rtxRIFWHw/BlEvspUYBZFx KjdlI3c7BlWEN0drs6PNTYKExS2wBl3JwzOVnEVWWScQoxpxhC203i6QY3Xz3igzZLWoRwDOY Vtf9yNydbTTf+JnC4TrQsHufGS2aweU++1PpfTjmjhl2JSrJb/q7WZkITLhdYiOlX2w2TlUMx J+1LT5Mb47lR3u+vqQm3ggY6paqjuX46jFExElUBzw2fcGfAqleeTYTUYoXDaEEjkLmje1+b3 /AzUpBOvYnoFWGcG4obwQxaC6JopGumKPp5M2IeEI3xnSgeFquN/kNCmkJRzqc7/9HAFxFOth zbg8oBSTha6od4z645P7P5NIFzwQykeY97X1yoKjYEpYy1gyCp2VfkPJ2pmP5F897tmjWMhQn A7AX24mz8zK8eUGRj8MC7MpEmnhsqTlHmW/ftKEebFZaDeHEDmhKjSVMN8nntHAoKXL7VBLo9 gsOguJFgD3GPcmPE3Z4yLlxd8557dHDAUMzuedYZMLSmmDCWlQWfBG9ZMOAkp6XJ41i8L1p7K 9z2pD/tuHWrlqxHu0L4wk12WpRaeucc4o29MAl0tolL8IBuIUE6Fz7FNcgMr4Beo6ZW9iFV3D J0Hvhtd X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Gemini Lasswell writes: > I've just pushed to Emacs master that long-anticipated rewrite of > edebug-backtrace, which includes making links to functions. Yet I only read the documentation additions of your merge, but that all sounds very nice, thank you! [...] Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 1428 Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 1428@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, 1428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Gemini Lasswell writes: > I've just pushed to Emacs master that long-anticipated rewrite of > edebug-backtrace, which includes making links to functions. Yet I only read the documentation additions of your merge, but that all sounds very nice, thank you! [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (michael_heerdegen[at]web.de) -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 4.0 EMACSBUGS_TO Sent to the old emacsbugs server Gemini Lasswell writes: > I've just pushed to Emacs master that long-anticipated rewrite of > edebug-backtrace, which includes making links to functions. Yet I only read the documentation additions of your merge, but that all sounds very nice, thank you! Michael. From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:08:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator