GNU bug report logs -
#14192
24.3.50; recursive edit while running ispell not working usefully
Previous Next
Reported by: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:06:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Found in version 24.3.50
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #43 received at 14192 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, 14192 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 02:25:20 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > FTR: C-r indeed was not meant to be used to modify the misspelled
> > word. ispell.el has 'r' and 'R' commands for that. C-r is for
> > consulting the rest of the text, without modifying it and without
> > disrupting the spelling session. An alternative is to type 'X', make
> > any modifications you want, and then resume spelling with "C-u M-$".
>
> Thanks - especially for your concretizations of the spell checking
> related parts in the user manual.
>
> I find it an a bit obscure design that there is C-r that reverses edits,
> then X, which allows to resume the session, and C-g, which doesn't allow
> resuming. Maybe less commands would suffice. But I don't use ispell
> often, I can't really tell whether the interface is intuitive, and
> nobody else seems to be interested in this topic.
I'm not opposed to patches to maybe make the C-r scenario less
surprising. But in general, C-r is an obscure command in this case;
it isn't an accident that it was not even documented in the user
manual until recently. The alternatives described above are IMO
better.
> So, if we don't get any other replies until some more time has passed,
> I'm ok with closing this one.
Will do in a week or two.
Thanks.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 172 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.