Subject: Re: bug#14154: 24.3.50; doc string of `other-buffer'

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:41:50 -0800

"Drew Adams" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Does not say what the behavior of BUFFER=nil is/means/does, and that's
> the default situation!  The entire string is written as if BUFFER is a
> buffer.

I think it's pretty clear.  If BUFFER is a buffer, then it's not a
candidate.  If not, ... not.  Closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/