Subject: bug#14062: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt

From: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0200

> But for nil, BUFFERP will return zero, and the code that uses XBUFFER
 > should not be called, IMO.
[...]
 > But the uninitialized contents field should be zero, no?  Again, it
 > should not pass the BUFFERP test.
 >
 > So the mystery still stands.

You mean that the w->contents argument of XBUFFER _always_ passes the
BUFFERP test first and then fails at the assertion in XBUFFER?  How can
that make sense?

martin