Subject: Re: bug#14047: more aggressive inlining

From: Andy Wingo <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:31:22 +0100

On Mon 25 Mar 2013 10:42, Daniel Llorens <[email-masked]> writes:

>> On Fri 01 Mar 2013 10:01, Daniel Llorens <[email-masked]> writes:
>> 
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (vector-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>>> $1 = 1
>>> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (array-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
>>> $2 = (array-ref '#(1 2 3) 0)
>> 
>> File a bug for this case, this sort of thing is totally fixable :)
>
> So I think this use of array-ref should be inlined.
>
> Same for other simple functions such as e.g.
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (real-part 1+1i)
> $1 = (real-part 1.0+1.0i)
> scheme@(guile-user)> 
>
> imag-part, magnitude, and so on.

If you would like to make a precise list, that would be helpful.

Cheers,

A
-- 
http://wingolog.org/