GNU bug report logs - #14045
24.3.50; Misleading argument name in `call-process'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#14045: closed (24.3.50; Misleading argument name in
 `call-process')
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 01:58:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2013 09:56:12 +0800
with message-id <CAAF+z6HM1enHE489CFL-xs8KjRTOgLJe0hUy1Of97q7pNsgmpA <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: 24.3.50; Misleading argument name in `call-process'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14045,
regarding 24.3.50; Misleading argument name in `call-process'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
14045: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14045
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.3.50; Misleading argument name in `call-process'
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:39:47 +0800

In the doc string of the function `call-process', the third argument
"buffer" is somewhat misleading, since it can also be a file.  I suggest
to change it to "destination".

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2)
 of 2013-03-24 on debian
Bzr revision: 112123 eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu-20130324024051-z0xmpfe1wbykouv8

-- 
Xue Fuqiao
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free <at> gmail.com>
To: 14045-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 24.3.50; Misleading argument name in `call-process'
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 09:56:12 +0800

Fixed.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.