GNU bug report logs -
#14029
24.2.50; [PATCH] imenu problems with special elements
Previous Next
Reported by: Andreas Politz <politza <at> fh-trier.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 01:27:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Found in version 24.2.50
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 29 Nov 2013 05:43:57 +0200
with message-id <52980D7D.2060902 <at> yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: bug#14029: 24.2.50; [PATCH] imenu problems with special elements
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #14029,
regarding 24.2.50; [PATCH] imenu problems with special elements
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
14029: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=14029
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
,----[ (info "(elisp) Imenu") ]
| Special elements look like this:
|
| (INDEX-NAME INDEX-POSITION FUNCTION ARGUMENTS...)
|
| Selecting a special element performs:
|
| (funcall FUNCTION
| INDEX-NAME INDEX-POSITION ARGUMENTS...)
`----
1. At least one function does not recognize these elements, resulting
in an error.
2. The advertised calling convention is different from the actual one in
`imenu'.
3. The `imenu--subalist-p' predicate is unsafe and incomplete.
Andreas
diff -c -L /home/politza/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/imenu.el -L \#\<buffer\ imenu.el\> /home/politza/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/imenu.el /tmp/buffer-content-3095O-q
*** /home/politza/src/emacs/trunk/lisp/imenu.el
--- #<buffer imenu.el>
***************
*** 286,293 ****
(defun imenu--subalist-p (item)
! (and (consp (cdr item)) (listp (cadr item))
! (not (eq (car (cadr item)) 'lambda))))
(defmacro imenu-progress-message (_prevpos &optional _relpos _reverse)
"Macro to display a progress message.
--- 286,295 ----
(defun imenu--subalist-p (item)
! (and (consp item)
! (consp (cdr item))
! (listp (cadr item))
! (not (functionp (cadr item)))))
(defmacro imenu-progress-message (_prevpos &optional _relpos _reverse)
"Macro to display a progress message.
***************
*** 641,647 ****
;; We are only interested in the bottom-level elements, so we need to
;; recurse if TAIL is a list.
(cond ((listp tail)
! (if (setq res (imenu--in-alist str tail))
(setq alist nil)))
((if imenu-name-lookup-function
(funcall imenu-name-lookup-function str head)
--- 643,650 ----
;; We are only interested in the bottom-level elements, so we need to
;; recurse if TAIL is a list.
(cond ((listp tail)
! (if (and (imenu--subalist-p elt)
! (setq res (imenu--in-alist str tail)))
(setq alist nil)))
((if imenu-name-lookup-function
(funcall imenu-name-lookup-function str head)
***************
*** 1024,1030 ****
(nth 2 index-item) imenu-default-goto-function))
(position (if is-special-item
(cadr index-item) (cdr index-item)))
! (rest (if is-special-item (cddr index-item))))
(apply function (car index-item) position rest))
(run-hooks 'imenu-after-jump-hook)))
--- 1027,1033 ----
(nth 2 index-item) imenu-default-goto-function))
(position (if is-special-item
(cadr index-item) (cdr index-item)))
! (rest (if is-special-item (cdddr index-item))))
(apply function (car index-item) position rest))
(run-hooks 'imenu-after-jump-hook)))
Diff finished. Fri Mar 22 02:15:09 2013
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Version: 24.4
Thanks, that's clearer. Installed in revision 115279.
One note:
>> Is it possible for (cadr item) to be a list and also be `functionp'
and yet not
>> have its car be `lambda'? Dunno. I was under the impression that
it was
>> impossible, but I could be wrong. If it is possible, is it better
to test
>> `functionp' here? Dunno.
>
> If the documentation states FUNCTION, then it should be a function.
The documentation allows FUNCTION in the third element, but
`imenu--subalist-p' is checking whether the second element is a function.
AFAICT, it's checking against malformed items. Your change makes it also
guard against lexically-bound lambdas (their car is `closure'), so
that's good, I guess.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 181 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.