GNU bug report logs -
#13995
Problem with macros whose expansions define and use auxiliary macros
Previous Next
Reported by: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:14:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#13995: Problem with macros whose expansions define and use auxiliary macros
which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 13995 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
13995: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13995
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
So, this example works on master, but for reasons you don't like. We
can't fix it on 2.0. If you feel that the solution for macro-introduced
identifiers in 2.2 is a release blocker, let's open a thread on -devel
again and talk about it, see if we can find some solutions :)
In the meantime, closing this one, as there's no 2.0 task and the code
"works" in 2.2.
Andy
On Tue 19 Mar 2013 00:11, Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org> writes:
> Consider the following module:
>
> (define-module (foo)
> #:export (foo))
>
> (define-syntax-rule (foo bar)
> (begin
> (define-syntax-rule (blah x) x)
> (define (bar val) (blah val))))
>
> and the following session with v2.0.7-204-g1ea3762:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (foo)
> scheme@(guile-user)> (foo bar)
> scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 5)
> ERROR: In procedure #<syntax-transformer blah>:
> ERROR: Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer blah>
>
> Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
> scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
>
> Note that it works when the same 'foo' macro is entered directly
> at a fresh REPL:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)>
> (define-syntax-rule (foo bar)
> (begin
> (define-syntax-rule (blah x) x)
> (define (bar val) (blah val))))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (foo bar)
> scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 5)
> $1 = 5
> scheme@(guile-user)>
>
> Mark
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Consider the following module:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-module (foo)
#:export (foo))
(define-syntax-rule (foo bar)
(begin
(define-syntax-rule (blah x) x)
(define (bar val) (blah val))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
and the following session with v2.0.7-204-g1ea3762:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (foo)
scheme@(guile-user)> (foo bar)
scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 5)
ERROR: In procedure #<syntax-transformer blah>:
ERROR: Wrong type to apply: #<syntax-transformer blah>
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Note that it works when the same 'foo' macro is entered directly
at a fresh REPL:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)>
(define-syntax-rule (foo bar)
(begin
(define-syntax-rule (blah x) x)
(define (bar val) (blah val))))
scheme@(guile-user)> (foo bar)
scheme@(guile-user)> (bar 5)
$1 = 5
scheme@(guile-user)>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Mark
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 341 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.