GNU bug report logs - #13966
Inconsistent truncation of multiple values, inlining issue?

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens <at> bluewin.ch>

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:08:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens <at> bluewin.ch>
Subject: bug#13966: closed (Re: bug#13966: inlining issue?)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:08:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#13966: Inconsistent truncation of multiple values, inlining issue?

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 13966 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
13966: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13966
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens <at> bluewin.ch>
Cc: 13966-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13966: inlining issue?
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:06:53 +0200
On Fri 15 Mar 2013 13:57, Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens <at> bluewin.ch> writes:

> Compare 
>
> (define f (lambda (a) a))
> (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) f)
>
> vs
>
> (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) (lambda (a) a))
>
> The first one fails with
>
> <unnamed port>:1:0: In procedure f:
> <unnamed port>:1:0: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure f (a)>
>
> The second one gives 3. 
>
> This is Guile 2.0.7.112-f5ea5.
>
> The behavior of the first case makes (compose f g) fail when f takes less args tan g produces.

Fixed in fff013215fb1a5d211df5037dcf52c92063050a8 on master.

Thanks for the report!

Andy

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens <at> bluewin.ch>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: inlining issue?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:26 +0100
Compare 

(define f (lambda (a) a))
(call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) f)

vs

(call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) (lambda (a) a))

The first one fails with

<unnamed port>:1:0: In procedure f:
<unnamed port>:1:0: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure f (a)>

The second one gives 3. 

This is Guile 2.0.7.112-f5ea5.

The behavior of the first case makes (compose f g) fail when f takes less args tan g produces.

Regards

	Daniel




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 28 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.