Subject: bug#13949: 24.4.1; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:23:07 +0100

Drew Adams <[email-masked]> writes:

> Yes, _IF_ we can guarantee that there are no differences between the
> before and after states, that is, no differences that a user or Lisp
> program can discern.

Of course!

And if we do that, I guess we should also remove the head of
`buffer-undo-list' which suffers from the same problem.

Michael.