Subject: Re: bug#13949: 24.3.50; `fill-paragraph' should not always put the buffer as modified

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:19:16 +0200

> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:01:13 +0100
> From: Andreas Röhler <[email-masked]>
> CC: [email-masked]
> 
> Am 14.03.2013 19:49, schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> >> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:34:40 +0100
> >> From: Andreas Röhler <[email-masked]>
> >>
> >> If fill-paragraph is at stake only, store paragraph in a string at beginning and
> >> compare the result should be enough to reset the modify flag if justified.
> >
> > It is not uncommon to have very large buffers with a single
> > paragraph.  What you suggest is hardly memory-efficient.
> >
> 
> In this case, after checking the length, writing it to a temp-file might be an option.

April 1 is still way too far away to enjoy this.