From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:58:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation. Resent-From: Patrick Pan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13904 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 13904@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136273338229716 (code B ref -1); Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:04:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2013 09:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtCf-0007j4-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:03:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqv-0007CY-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:40:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqC-0001cO-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:37105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqC-0001cJ-Bl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq9-0006Nb-J4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq6-0001bD-TI for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]:54570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq6-0001b5-O3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:42 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so1085425obc.19 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:39:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aFaguI/ThFVQ4r9eKeOtK2lSKdnIB3XDt40gAuQ4XwQ=; b=G6meku4CZGGzDwiEYEeqJ95gehjecMPTEjeVAWNPpYS8fSHxEpDix82MYx7L7Tx9ML dZm26BNtVEts6+Cfm4M1zwcQPSuu8rSVv9zJW0JJfrvOkkzZPQkjB5jRjT1R1jA46/sM Cl5IFxLtqEdnFY5PxWTf/9lusHsCkdo9uJTLc42b4Dnxty6QiF48MBs1boKLDKxuAkqQ vUv96SwDDBv2UZYheSBZR3dpeSvVJ9FZgGXeHR/w7wJjMxdfotCZOqojpjSyNfj/e7tw jybpthTjUiqn0Db3pw6Zakyd12lAm8XbjmzlWM6GomUgdLjDLexXSNEef65azNUKsWh0 /SWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.108.104 with SMTP id hj8mr930624obb.44.1362731981886; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:39:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.104.67 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:39:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:39:41 +0800 Message-ID: From: Patrick Pan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:03:00 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) 6.9.8 Procedures with Setters A procedure with setter is a special kind of procedure which normally behaves like any accessor procedure, that is a procedure which accesses a data structure. The difference is that this kind of procedure has a so-called setter attached, which is a procedure for storing something into a data structure. Procedures with setters are treated specially when the procedure appears in the special form set! (REFFIXME). How it works is best shown by example. Suppose we have a procedure called foo-ref, which accepts two arguments, a value of type foo and an integer. The procedure returns the value stored at the given index in the foo object. Let f be a variable containing such a foo data structure. Mind the 'REFFIXME'. Thank you for your time and GREAT JOB. Best, Patrick. From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:58:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation. Resent-From: Daniel Hartwig Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13904 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Patrick Pan Cc: 13904@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13904-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13904.136279037831518 (code B ref 13904); Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 13904) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2013 00:52:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UE81v-0008CE-9x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:52:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:54290) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UE81r-0008Bx-W4 for 13904@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:52:52 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l29so2041228iag.3 for <13904@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:52:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tSdkM33pgBaBDsiYwio2Pjpsd4pmmzDVhUSBy+j8Ya4=; b=xbbbzJ63AKNEBucIhNeCT8Nw2LsjcwqwBhPAxhQ89t0L6Uf1ap2mPhRr1vW+eqGkDT JhaySdCikwjJz/iApYXOxxJuMa58m9FOynnk1HExdF9z328qKscfNEjZbPJK/WPmQEyv VCdPi6yTVdm1XiYYO2ZeP7exRnHCGswIIyR2ZiQ/lapHfzBcQ4brz5WBZJcT/KOAJhAx VQmPJ3dwaoG2qyIz21Tlkw3MYRseyUqm96VN2ke9199PKQervR8sZExjqnKVzlHnKCkI Dsh9mCaDRBz89DSCsHZyIJDwnpLiPA1BppWMzmQUzq5xrwWWo8k1wKDYcHGUvlsGC1Pd JkoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.149.135 with SMTP id w7mr95630icv.25.1362790326450; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.26.168 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:52:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:52:06 +0800 Message-ID: From: Daniel Hartwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hello On 8 March 2013 16:39, Patrick Pan wrote: > 6.9.8 Procedures with Setters > > A procedure with setter is a special kind of procedure which normally > behaves like any > accessor procedure, that is a procedure which accesses a data > structure. The difference is > that this kind of procedure has a so-called setter attached, which is > a procedure for storing > something into a data structure. > Procedures with setters are treated specially when the procedure > appears in the special > form set! (REFFIXME). How it works is best shown by example. > Suppose we have a procedure called foo-ref, which accepts two > arguments, a value of > type foo and an integer. The procedure returns the value stored at the > given index in the > foo object. Let f be a variable containing such a foo data structure. > > > Mind the 'REFFIXME'. Is that the issue you are reporting? Marks such as this (e.g. =E2=80=98FIXME=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98TODO=E2=80=99) a= ppear in many places as a reminder to fix or work on something in the future. I suppose in this case it is to cross-reference with the definition of =E2=80=98set!=E2=80=99= , which appears absent except for a brief note under _rnrs base_, and informal definition in _Hello Scheme!_ Generally, I don't think we also need bug reports to track this. From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:58:49 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Patrick Pan Subject: bug#13904: closed (Re: bug#13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation.) Message-ID: References: <87sj4424uf.fsf@pobox.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 13904 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile Reply-To: 13904@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:26:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1362828362-22835-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1362828362-22835-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation. which was filed against the guile package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 13904@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 13904: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D13904 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1362828362-22835-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 13904-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2013 11:25:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEHu4-0005vZ-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:25:28 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49180 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEHu2-0005vS-NC for 13904-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:25:27 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B766291A5; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:24:43 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=DqBJVhFuAhsB QKCnrYs1m+A/Dts=; b=tdefwCy3oTzt1JM9/h8BrBuF6P7qHs3LF+u1yjXtFy0a puIFbW5luwcwgvtx4OpwAyPAOypveKM0f/R/SajFMwh8IzkdzCOmfRdGa+tYxCYr UKw9u6WIow+DEAGz0ookoVySWl1wrz3QDdF5e8F9H7lpJ6lXZEfgKnowsOkENcI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=fy2sc9 1rJGhPKA4YB3Y676YgJ5gBwstEFwf8hqOKJfDxIGtpIqxyf2B+Nn4Qr82Y6t6LW/ 0miuI3xygxkx0R3mO4cjeVFbC+qExxo1bv+SjkIjKpqpwK+A4shUGwotSDAKpArn uhQkuA5WAqKvylBCa0wOwujPPp0EVgt5Khc90= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEED691A4; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:24:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A0DF91A3; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 06:24:43 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: Daniel Hartwig Subject: Re: bug#13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation. References: Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:24:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hartwig's message of "Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:52:06 +0800") Message-ID: <87sj4424uf.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F0B39D3C-88AB-11E2-A17B-59240E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 13904-close Cc: Patrick Pan , 13904-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) On Sat 09 Mar 2013 01:52, Daniel Hartwig writes: >> Mind the 'REFFIXME'. > > Is that the issue you are reporting? > > Marks such as this (e.g. =E2=80=98FIXME=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98TODO=E2=80=99)= appear in many places as a > reminder to fix or work on something in the future. I suppose in this > case it is to cross-reference with the definition of =E2=80=98set!=E2=80= =99, which > appears absent except for a brief note under _rnrs base_, and informal > definition in _Hello Scheme!_ > > Generally, I don't think we also need bug reports to track this. Yeah I agree -- I just took a look at this and it seems that someone just needs to write the docs. It's a bit ugly to look at in the documentation but on the other hand maybe we can see it as just a sign that the document is an ongoing human production, and that more help is appreciated :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/ ------------=_1362828362-22835-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2013 09:03:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38137 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtCf-0007j4-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:03:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqv-0007CY-0a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:40:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqC-0001cO-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:51 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:37105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsqC-0001cJ-Bl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq9-0006Nb-J4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq6-0001bD-TI for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]:54570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsq6-0001b5-O3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:39:42 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so1085425obc.19 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:39:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aFaguI/ThFVQ4r9eKeOtK2lSKdnIB3XDt40gAuQ4XwQ=; b=G6meku4CZGGzDwiEYEeqJ95gehjecMPTEjeVAWNPpYS8fSHxEpDix82MYx7L7Tx9ML dZm26BNtVEts6+Cfm4M1zwcQPSuu8rSVv9zJW0JJfrvOkkzZPQkjB5jRjT1R1jA46/sM Cl5IFxLtqEdnFY5PxWTf/9lusHsCkdo9uJTLc42b4Dnxty6QiF48MBs1boKLDKxuAkqQ vUv96SwDDBv2UZYheSBZR3dpeSvVJ9FZgGXeHR/w7wJjMxdfotCZOqojpjSyNfj/e7tw jybpthTjUiqn0Db3pw6Zakyd12lAm8XbjmzlWM6GomUgdLjDLexXSNEef65azNUKsWh0 /SWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.108.104 with SMTP id hj8mr930624obb.44.1362731981886; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:39:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.104.67 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:39:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:39:41 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: A bug in guile's newest documentation. From: Patrick Pan To: bug-guile@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.17 X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:03:00 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) 6.9.8 Procedures with Setters A procedure with setter is a special kind of procedure which normally behaves like any accessor procedure, that is a procedure which accesses a data structure. The difference is that this kind of procedure has a so-called setter attached, which is a procedure for storing something into a data structure. Procedures with setters are treated specially when the procedure appears in the special form set! (REFFIXME). How it works is best shown by example. Suppose we have a procedure called foo-ref, which accepts two arguments, a value of type foo and an integer. The procedure returns the value stored at the given index in the foo object. Let f be a variable containing such a foo data structure. Mind the 'REFFIXME'. Thank you for your time and GREAT JOB. Best, Patrick. ------------=_1362828362-22835-1-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 02:58:49 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#13904: A bug in guile's newest documentation. Resent-From: Patrick Pan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13904 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Wingo Cc: Daniel Hartwig , 13904-close@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 13904-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13904.13628350333655 (code D ref 13904); Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 13904-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2013 13:17:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEJeC-0000wt-74 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 08:17:12 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:63700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UEJe7-0000we-PS for 13904-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 08:17:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so3022148oag.40 for <13904-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:16:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3oDdjCnx6+57TWjjUbxPPiRBg4qBFGNvRRprptpH4fM=; b=ggsBRJAL5rj2BQMU4HAjUl4IqZEVX2oNiJP6UmWvVfTjyVr3LwtCrdRTSqqpFf8qkx J+AIUnaGzocaPVeE7yuomW2G333WFNSQ84xsXLhIQ+klrnVCm5JDeoAp2IExdbkyYOyx XI2Q0anaSk+99Svq9pN9WbHo/poYNM/dtB4sivwCbKhO4LHIRH6N51+kNcASJGiVCVx3 xW8KKbmJVmcDb8msQNKw3DnUwXCnNd4o8hEYwZ+fWGSSiS0CtiNSwUACxKinoGSXH7H0 NC6z0/V0uMjx62LCTAnpmfRfVhfkTcHEmgq6MSlWeThFk3jCxzQ+Pmxgaz9uM1wZTsqm 1Z2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.164.8 with SMTP id ym8mr4484441obb.68.1362834978908; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 05:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.104.67 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 05:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.104.67 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 05:16:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sj4424uf.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87sj4424uf.fsf@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:16:18 +0800 Message-ID: From: Patrick Pan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f646a07ce2eb204d77dbee9 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --e89a8f646a07ce2eb204d77dbee9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah. That=92s cool. I am a newbie to Scheme. Guile is great. Good job ever= y one ! Happy hacking. On Mar 9, 2013 7:24 PM, "Andy Wingo" wrote: > On Sat 09 Mar 2013 01:52, Daniel Hartwig writes: > > >> Mind the 'REFFIXME'. > > > > Is that the issue you are reporting? > > > > Marks such as this (e.g. =91FIXME=92, =91TODO=92) appear in many places= as a > > reminder to fix or work on something in the future. I suppose in this > > case it is to cross-reference with the definition of =91set!=92, which > > appears absent except for a brief note under _rnrs base_, and informal > > definition in _Hello Scheme!_ > > > > Generally, I don't think we also need bug reports to track this. > > Yeah I agree -- I just took a look at this and it seems that someone > just needs to write the docs. It's a bit ugly to look at in the > documentation but on the other hand maybe we can see it as just a sign > that the document is an ongoing human production, and that more help is > appreciated :) > > Andy > -- > http://wingolog.org/ > --e89a8f646a07ce2eb204d77dbee9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah. That=92s cool. I am a newbie to Scheme. Guile is great. Good job e= very one ! Happy hacking.

On Mar 9, 2013 7:24 PM, "Andy Wingo" &= lt;wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
On Sat 09 Mar 2013 01:52, Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@gmail.com> writes:

>> Mind the 'REFFIXME'.
>
> Is that the issue you are reporting?
>
> Marks such as this (e.g. =91FIXME=92, =91TODO=92) appear in many place= s as a
> reminder to fix or work on something in the future. =A0I suppose in th= is
> case it is to cross-reference with the definition of =91set!=92, which=
> appears absent except for a brief note under _rnrs base_, and informal=
> definition in _Hello Scheme!_
>
> Generally, I don't think we also need bug reports to track this.
Yeah I agree -- I just took a look at this and it seems that someone
just needs to write the docs. =A0It's a bit ugly to look at in the
documentation but on the other hand maybe we can see it as just a sign
that the document is an ongoing human production, and that more help is
appreciated :)

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/=
--e89a8f646a07ce2eb204d77dbee9--