GNU bug report logs - #13850
Emacs for Windows: Launch better from a command prompt

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andrew Pennebaker <andrew.pennebaker <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 20:55:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Joel Reicher <joel.reicher <at> gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 13850 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, help-emacs-windows <at> gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Andrew Pennebaker <andrew.pennebaker <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#13850: Emacs for Windows: Launch better from a command prompt
Date: Sun, 01 May 2022 19:57:51 +1000
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> We already do: just invoke runemacs.exe rather than emacs.exe.
>>
>> As for forking a thread: it is a bit more complex than that.  (We
>> already start at least 2 threads at startup.)  The 2 most important
>> problems are (1) the same executable should be able to run in a text
>> terminal session under -nw, and (2) we don't want the GUI session to
>> have a console.  runemacs.exe solves both.
>>
>> Any reasons not to close this bug?
>
> (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
> at the time.)
>
> "Use runemacs" seems like it's the correct answer here, so I'm closing
> this bug report.

It is the right answer, but I can't help thinking that there is an issue of ignorance amongst Window users.

Does anyone know why the OP had this `wrong'?

I think we need to keep an eye on Windows users usage patterns/habits; there may be an opportunity here, especially when it comes to the installer.

Regards,

        - Joel




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 79 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.