GNU bug report logs - #13835
[PATCH] Let reverse! accept arbitrary types as second argument (new_tail)

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:42:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#13835: closed (Re: bug#13835: [PATCH] Let reverse! accept
 arbitrary types as second argument (new_tail))
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 01:53:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#13835: [PATCH] Let reverse! accept arbitrary types as second argument (new_tail)

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 13835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
13835: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13835
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 13835-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13835: [PATCH] Let reverse! accept arbitrary types as second
	argument (new_tail)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:50:24 -0500
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> There is no reason to restrict the type of the second argument to proper
> lists as it is added as last CDR to the list without interpretation.
>
> This allows for stack-depth friendly usage [...]

Looks good to me.  Applied, thanks!

    Mark

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Let reverse! accept arbitrary types as second argument
	(new_tail)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:37:21 +0100
There is no reason to restrict the type of the second argument to proper
lists as it is added as last CDR to the list without interpretation.

This allows for stack-depth friendly usage (simplified from an actual
use case that blew up around my ears) like

SCM
my_tree_copy (SCM src)
{
  if (scm_is_pair (src))
    {
      SCM res = SCM_EOL;
      do
        {
          res = scm_cons (my_tree_copy (scm_car (src)), res);
          src = scm_cdr (src);
        }
      while (scm_is_pair (src));
      return scm_reverse_x (res, my_tree_copy (src));
    }
  return src;
}

* libguile/list.c (scm_reverse_x): remove typecheck for 2nd arg
---
 libguile/list.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libguile/list.c b/libguile/list.c
index 6c8f8be..d30f9e8 100644
--- a/libguile/list.c
+++ b/libguile/list.c
@@ -377,8 +377,6 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_reverse_x, "reverse!", 1, 1, 0,
   SCM_VALIDATE_LIST (1, lst);
   if (SCM_UNBNDP (new_tail))
     new_tail = SCM_EOL;
-  else
-    SCM_VALIDATE_LIST (2, new_tail);
 
   while (!SCM_NULL_OR_NIL_P (lst))
     {
-- 
1.7.10.4




This bug report was last modified 12 years and 90 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.